True, but this isn't straight up gambling.
For all anyone knows, Ad money might go out the window.
If someone has a business that they are paying to have put out there via some streams, do you think that the business would enjoy the stigma that might come from their association with an alleged thief?
Tiger lost some sponsors because he wasn't squeaky clean, i'm sure some businesses wouldn't want their "brand" to be associated with any criminal element.
They can always support someone else, right?
Although i will agree that pool players around the world, don't really care who brings it to them, as long as they get to watch it, so if any action is going to be taken, it would have to be on the sponsor/venue side of things, to actually be effective.
If done in that fashion, it might put them out of business if no one wants to support them anymore.
Different aspect that I hadn't thought of.
