Because if the author wrote about how a more famous player dogged it or shit out, there would be 10x as many posts here complaining about how the article was biased in the opposite direction.
What if it was the truth?
Mika chowed his brains out on that 7ball.
Everyone who was watching knows that.
If the headline read, "Mika dogged his brains out", so what?
The only ones that would disagree would be either his friends, people who can only handle political correctness, or people who had no idea what they were talking about. (in the case of all three, who cares about their opinions anyway?)
I'd almost rather have the truth then some "an uncharacteristic miss by Mika on the 7ball..." cause that just pussyfoots around the topic.
I'd rather have the truth, regardless of the controversy it caused.
If people got bent, GOOD.
Now if someone who is friends with someone is painting the wrong picture, to pump up their friends image, that is typical clique behavior.
Hill hill turns into slaughter, crapped out turns into fate/fortuitous, and mediocre play turns into world class/championship level.
What tour did this happen on?