I can't help but feel for John- It reminded me of the days of Earl Playing with cuetec . And playing terrible because of his sponsorship cue. All those adds for Fury made me sick. It looked like an ob shaft. But I couldn't help but feel for John -I've never seen him miss shots like he did in the finals. I also relate it to Shane using his sponsorship cue. He wasn't the same player either. I know Shane plays better with a Joss,and how good did John play with a bobby hunter. Sorry ,Art I hope you did make some money selling the fury's. but in my eyes John was at a great disadvantage. I'd rather pay for a stream than force these players to compete at a disadvantage.
I can't help but feel for John- It reminded me of the days of Earl Playing with cuetec . And playing terrible because of his sponsorship cue. All those adds for Fury made me sick. It looked like an ob shaft. But I couldn't help but feel for John -I've never seen him miss shots like he did in the finals. I also relate it to Shane using his sponsorship cue. He wasn't the same player either. I know Shane plays better with a Joss,and how good did John play with a bobby hunter. Sorry ,Art I hope you did make some money selling the fury's. but in my eyes John was at a great disadvantage. I'd rather pay for a stream than force these players to compete at a disadvantage.
You must not think too much of either of these guys if you think they would compete with equipment they feel puts them at a disadvantage.
When John was approached about using a Fury cue and being a professional player representative, the first thing that happened was he was given a number of test cues to solicit his opinions as to whether or not they felt right and he felt he could compete with one and win. No player that Fury sponsors has ever simply be given free reign. For players to truly represent a product, they must believe in it, and believe they can win with it.
After trying a number of them, he settled in with a model and modified his shaft to his liking, however it is STILL a Fury shaft. He will be the FIRST to tell you that NO sponsorship is worth more than winning tournaments. You are mistaken if you think that sponsorship in this industry can in any way surpass potential tournament winnings.
I was there and saw the finals. John was not on top of his game, but we ALL have off days. However, I was also there during the preliminaries when John ran rack after rack with his Fury cue. Did you happen to see any of those early rounds?
You say that all those Fury ads make you sick...well, I am stepping out of my box (normally I wouldn't even respond to such a post) and saying that its folks like you, who bash a product and a brand that are sincerely trying to contribute to this sport by helping players and events, as well as putting a product out there that is, in fact, very good and in many ways superior to its competition, that really irk me. Please tell me what experience you have playing with a Fury cue. Do you recall the tournaments that were won by players playing with Fury? Kelly Fisher has snapped off a few with hers. Rodney Morris took second in the Pro Player Championship in 2003 playing with one right off the rack. Lee Van Corteza won Turning Stone with one, and he isn't even a sponsored player.
You should investigate the quality of the cues before making rash statements like ones you have made.
I understand the potential for getting flamed for this post, but I felt compelled to let you know that Fury cues are no lesser a cue in terms of playability and offering anyone a chance to compete at a high level.
A few years later, John was sponsored by OB Cues - prior to that he had shot exclusively with his Bob Hunter cue. At the time, his high run was EXACTLY 400. The night that John received his OB1 Shaft, he eclipsed his high run with a 403 (I think he told me it was his third attempt).
A bit of a sidebar but I want to ask: Are you saying below, that John broke 400 because of the OB1 Shaft?
If so, I would find this difficult to reason as he obviously was capable of running over 400 having ran 400 previously. Because of this, I believe we must consider the gains that come from additional practice.
Thanks for the clarification.
I believe he was simply giving an example where Mr. Schmidt adapted to new equipment quickly, therefore, negating the OPs assumption.
Carl
Does it really remind you of the days of Earl and Cuetec? Not that I'm a fan of Cuetec, but didn't he win most of his titles playing with that Cuetec? I know he's publicly said that cue "ruined his game", but that's Earl being Earl IMHO...he played at the top of his game during those 17 years.
Does it really remind you of the days of Earl and Cuetec? Not that I'm a fan of Cuetec, but didn't he win most of his titles playing with that Cuetec? I know he's publicly said that cue "ruined his game", but that's Earl being Earl IMHO...he played at the top of his game during those 17 years.