Doug, I get your point and empathize with your stance on some of the opinions shared on this forum. Not all of them are representative of mainstream America, IMO.
That said, there must be some reason why those robotic-like European tournament soldiers come to the United States to live. If it ain't for our pocket billiards community, then it must be something here that attracts these pool players from around the world.
"GREAT" Britain may be well known for its snooker players, much more so than this side of the pond, but we have our share of legendary pool players, much more so than your side of the pond, going all the way back to the early 20th century. I am reminded of legendary pool players like Wimpy, Murphy, Steve Mizerak, Louie Roberts, Cornbread Red, Irving Crane, Willie Mosconi, Fats, et cetera, et cetera. (END QUOTE)
"Robotic-like European tournament soldiers" is an interesting turn of phrase, but you could also view it as "focused, determined, undistractable," unlike, say, Strickland, who's as naturally talented as anyone on the planet but his own worst enemy.
And putting "GREAT" in ironic quotation marks seems a little xenophobic.
FWIW, I live on this side of the pond and will be rooting for team USA, CW or no CW.
Sorry, but IMO being "representative of mainstream America" means being accepting and welcoming of people from other countries. Without that, there wouldn't be an America.
I agree that we have a history of great pool players. But the world has changed. Fifty years ago, they didn't play much pool in the Philippines or Finland or Taiwan or the UK. The talent pool has swelled from 300,000 Americans to 7 billion people around the world, and in many of those countries pool is a real sport, not something you play on a date in a bar on Friday night. Inevitably, we're going to lose our hegemony.
Go Team USA.