Haddad ? Hmmm I dont think so...?
Since we're talking about Titlists, lemme ask your opinion on something...
Why exactly are/were they so popular, when there were other good cues to choose from?
Just a fad gone wild? Or is there something inherently better about that cue?
no right or wrong answer, just your thoughts
Good question. I have some facts to work with and some theories.
In the 1920's there was a divergance between the design of 3 cushion cues and pocket billiards cues. Up until then, cues were shorter, fatter,and stiffer. As pocket billiards became a more popular game, cues designed for playing pool becaume more popular.
In the 1920's Brunswick mainly had a cue numbering system instead of a naming system, so these models like 26 1/2 and 360 didn't describe anything. In the 1930's, Brunswick decided to go with names instead of numbers for what I think were marketing reasons. Around that time, the "pro taper" was introduced. The pro taper is a weaker, more flexible taper than the European style cone shape. It transmitted more feel and was more suitable to pool, where the cone taper is more suitable to 3 cushion's larger, heavier balls, masse's and more powerful stroke.
Around 1940/41, the Titlist was introduced and was marketed as a fancy house cue for pool rooms. Brunswick was big into pool rooms and bowling alley's, so this was their mass market. These older Titlists are of similar dimensions as the modern pool cue, with similar tapers, feel, and weights. They play good and feel good - especially since they were one piece cues. The Willie Hoppe pro is similar but the fatter handle with leather grip didn't have quite the feel of a Titlist.
The best cue makers of the 1950's and 1960's used the Titlist as their "go to" cue for conversion. Makers like George Balabushka, Herman Rambow, Frank Paradise, and Palmer were turning them into first class playing cues.
Why were these cue makers choosing Titlists? There was nothing else at the time that were as well made or as good looking. Brunswick had the best production cue making operation.
Later on, in the 1960's and especially ther 1970's, as cue making techniques advanced, this was no longer the case and Brunswick shut down their cue making operation.
With all that being said, I think it's really because they look good to this day and are a "classic". To own a Titlist conversion is like owning a classic car. Take a '57 Chevy for example. It may not be as good or as fast as a 2012 Chevy, but which one looks cooler and gets more attention cruising down the boulevard?
The question I never figured out was why Brunswick wanted Willie Hoppe's signature on a pool cue? I realize he was a champion but a pool player would have been more appropriate.