I'm actually working with a guy from California that is a golf instructor who
likes our Touch of Inside Technique....his name is
Dan Shauger - dan@aperfectswing.com
Have you heard of him, he's got some videos out that are very good. I worked
two years with Hank Haney, but couldn't quite get his swing down.....I now use
a combination of what Hank teaches and some of Dan's techniques as well.
Where do you play in Corona? I don't think there's any pool rooms,
maybe in Riverside there's Shooters last I heard.....I used to date a
young lady from there that I met at the Bicycle Club.
Hey CJ,
I've heard of Dan Shauger and have seen a couple of his YouTube videos. He definitely knows what he is talking about. I envy your being able to work with Dan and Hank. I wish I had access to someone of that level for my game.
In Corona, I play in my garage. I have a bar box that I bang balls on once in a while. There is Shooters, out in Riverside, but I don't make it out that direction very often. I work in Orange County, so I usually head over to Danny K's (right by Angel Stadium and Honda Center) after work and do most of my playing there. I also like to make a trip out to Hard Times Bellflower now and then. I grew up around there, so it's always nice to play a few racks after visiting family.
If you are ever in the area, and want a 4-5 hour break from the pool rooms, let me know and we can go tee it up somewhere.
Mike
Yes, I understand, no one likes pressure, tension, or stress. However, through my many years of high stakes gambling and tournament play I "real eyesed" that there's no way to completely stop pressure, stress, and/or tension so I may as well go with "the flow," instead of fighting against it.
I find the full length golf swing much more complicated than the pool stroke. But, I find putting to have many similarities. Tempo, stroke length, alignment, aiming, routines.
Do you use any other golf analogies in pool ?
There is a transition time with every player, it's just a matter of how abbreviated it is. We call this "The Gathering of the Shot" - players like Buddy Hall do it beautifully - this is one of the reasons he was known to have the best cue ball control in history.
This is What I've Noticed About What Buddy Hall and Other Champions Do Differently:
It requires energy to take the cue back and it takes more energy to redirect the cue. Mentally (usually sub consciously) there's a calculation that must take place to equate the forward movement of the cue with the speed and length of the shot.
We like to practice exaggerating this technique so that there's a distinct forward motion of the cue......after all, we never hit the cue ball with our back-swing, it's just used to coil the cue back before the moment of release - or they say "the moment of highest tension".
There is one school of thought that the follow through doesn't matter because the cue ball is already gone. This may be true in one respect, especially if you just look at the stroke mechanically. However, from my experience it's vital to control the after contact movement of the cue ball WITH the length of the follow through.
This is what gives the player (like Buddy Hall) that high degree of touch and feel for the game that's essential for top notch performance under pressure......when you are in that "do or die" situation do you lose your touch and feel? Maybe this will help you.
When I want the "after contact" movement of the cue ball to be exaggerated I exaggerate the follow through, when I want the "after contact" movement to be compact, I compact my follow through.....even if I want the cue ball to jump slightly I'll use a "staccato type" follow through that creates that movement so the cue ball's reaction is either delayed or accelerated.
If Buddy Hall didn't have a very good understanding of how the cue moves FORWARD from the top of the back-swing he would not be able to play at the champion's level of performance. His forward movement is one of the best I've ever seen, he never seems to be in a hurry or "reaching" for power, he always has an ample supply in his grasp.
Whether a player is aware of it or not the follow through must connect to the "after contact" reaction of the cue ball....or you'll always be playing a "guessing game," and it really shows up under the pressure of a high dollar match or tournament.
The cue ball's reaction, at the highest level is a reflection of what the cue is doing......the more you can calibrate the cue's motion to coincide with the cue ball's "after contact" reaction the better off you will be.......this is one of the essential "differences that make a difference" in winning or just coming close. 'The Inner Game is the Teacher'
For me it's just a matter of putting yourself in the scenario as much as possible. Those who CAN settle down and relax under pressure, generally perform better than those who can't IME. I play easily as much competitive golf as I do 'casual'. Eventually it just becomes automatic.
People often list Buddy as a reference to the best CB control ever. However, I often wonder why he never won a world 14.1 or one pocket championship? Is there a difference between superb 9ball positioning and superb 14.1 positioning? Isn't CB control not defined by the game, but by the act of getting to where you need to go?
I'm not knocking --- I'm just asking a question because it's always puzzled me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpiderWebComm View Post
People often list Buddy as a reference to the best CB control ever. However, I often wonder why he never won a world 14.1 or one pocket championship? Is there a difference between superb 9ball positioning and superb 14.1 positioning? Isn't CB control not defined by the game, but by the act of getting to where you need to go?
I'm not knocking --- I'm just asking a question because it's always puzzled me.
Superb cueball control is not the only thing needed to excel at those other games.
Just like in 9 ball, you can have great cueball control to within a couple of inches, but if you make the wrong choices a mm will be enough to screw you.
I'm DEFINITELY not saying that Buddy made the wrong decisions in one hole and 14.1, just saying that it's more than just cueball control.
I have excellent cueball control but struggled with one hole for a long time because of how I played it, not knowing any better.
Jaden
People often list Buddy as a reference to the best CB control ever. However, I often wonder why he never won a world 14.1 or one pocket championship? Is there a difference between superb 9ball positioning and superb 14.1 positioning? Isn't CB control not defined by the game, but by the act of getting to where you need to go?
I'm not knocking --- I'm just asking a question because it's always puzzled me.
I agree, considerably more.
I apply mostly general concepts I'd say, things like grip pressure and muscle control. There really is only one "Full" swing in golf IMO, and that's the tee shoot. While not 100%, it's pretty dang close. But that is also the only shot in golf where you are trying to hit the ball as far as possible.
Every other swing in golf is a precisely controlled percentage. And then that's compounded by the conditions of the shot, total slope (elevation), desired shot trajectory and what I want the ball to do once it lands. Every minute error builds upon itself so your first input is paramount. My parallel there to pool, as I eluded to in my previous post, is that I prefer to have full control over the pool cue during the stroke from the back stroke, to the transition (stop) and to the forward acceleration of the cue through the ball. It's a very similar process to golf and is the number one reason most weaker golfers struggle with their short game. Most have a very hard time relaxing the correct muscle groups to allow for a smooth and highly fluid stroke at anything less than 100%. Most tend to 'bounce' off the dynamic tension they create during the backswing and then fight to control it. Often becoming jerky and/or erratic with questionable measure of metering output. This again I see very regularly in pool players.
Other than that, I apply pretty much all of my mental approach to pool or anything overly competitive really. That's really where it all starts.![]()
As written before I believe that a consistent speed of delivering the cue is important
different players may have different speeds. This can only help your rhythm
My fellow player in my team, took some lessons from Terry Griftths, the first thing he noticed was
that he did not move the position of his butt hand.
It was suggested to him that he should move his hand along the butt to a degree for softer shots and more to the back end of the butt for power shots, thus helping to maintain a consistent speed
I hope this makes sense.
There are plenty of full swing golf shots in fact the better golfers swing is exactly the same thru out the bag even to the SW that way the distances are easily predictable
Also the left side is dominate in a golf swing the less right hand the better unlike pool where the left hand is still
I keep hearing all these comparisons to golf but I see very little of it being the same
1
There are plenty of full swing golf shots in fact the better golfers swing is exactly the same thru out the bag even to the SW that way the distances are easily predictable
Also the left side is dominate in a golf swing the less right hand the better unlike pool where the left hand is still
I keep hearing all these comparisons to golf but I see very little of it being the same
1
I find golf putting to be similar to the pool stroke. Pendulum stroke. Straight back, straight through, smooth tempo, accelerating stroke, stroke length changes depending on the length of the shot, speed of the green.
Well IMO your pretty far off from your understanding of high level golf. But it's not a big deal either way.
My comparisons were 'my' comparisons and how I do it and see it. From a golf prospective, I've been at it for many decades and have been fortunate to make a pretty comfortable living from it.
I honestly would never expect CJ to acknowledge any theories not for sale on one of his DVDs,It's pretty par for the course for one to just hit up Google till they find random applicable quotes now a days, there are tons out there for the choosing. Of course we all know there is only one way to do anything....as long as that way can be packaged and shipped.
I just figured I'd share a contrasting view anyways.
FWIW......which apparently was very little. At least I didn't have to insinuate degradation or insult in the process.
![]()