Some thoughts and comparisons between TAR & Bonus Ball as well as between "planet pool" and mainstream business.
Some positives (+) and negatives (-) below:
TAR (JCIN)
+ a visionary leader who is not afraid to take risks
+ an enduring love of the game
+ street cred
+ contacts within the industry
+ knowledge and experience with the industry
+ the beginnings of a brand
+ positive reputation with industry
+ presumably a list of people willing to pay to watch pool
- a pool studio for video taping and live streaming that is expensive to maintain and is under utilized
- lack of capitalization
- an unproven and questionable entertainment format. By this I mean that if the PGA (probably the best capitalized individual sport on TV) developed a TAR like approach and tried to sell a three day one on one match between Adam Scott #2 in the world and Henrik Stenson #3 in the world where you watched them play from hole to hole for 3 straight rounds very few people would be interested. Especially if it was pay per view. And I am talking Golf & #2 versus #3 in the world, so, why would it work for pool?
Bonus Ball
+ reasonably well capitalized
+ interesting proposition of team competition that may lend itself better to TV for the masses
- a pool studio for video taping and live streaming that is expensive to maintain and under utilized
- lack of street cred
- questionable understanding of the industry
- poor industry relations due to rocky and somewhat aggressive launch
I lived in the air-conditioned, carpeted jungle of a Fortune 500 company for quite a while. Despite the dog eat dog environment one thing remained constant... leave your ego at the door and figure out how to make money. The venture had to succeed in order to pay all the salaries, bonuses & such that supported your lifestyle. This "group success focus" in order for individuals to prosper oftentimes led to compromise and strange bed fellows. And, it almost always led to profits and success.
Look at XM & Sirius satellite radio.... absolute competitors trying to drive each other out of business that merged to try to survive. Look at all the mergers in corporate America. Groups and individuals compromise and enemies join forces to survive and prosper. When 2 organizations have complimenting strengths and weaknesses there is much to be gained by joining forces to expand strengths and eliminate redundancies.
Why shouldn't "planet pool" work the same way as mainstream business? If it was an MBA program exercise where the background and current status of TAR and Bonus Ball was presented as a business problem there would be a compelling argument to merge the two and utilized the complimentary strengths of the organizations and people involved.
The one thing that is clear to me is that an entity made up of TAR and Bonus Ball would have far more to bring to market and far superior skill sets and resources than either have today individually.
It most likely won't happen... it is hard. It takes great effort and a greater amount of humility to listen, compromise and cooperate.
Something to think about
Some positives (+) and negatives (-) below:
TAR (JCIN)
+ a visionary leader who is not afraid to take risks
+ an enduring love of the game
+ street cred
+ contacts within the industry
+ knowledge and experience with the industry
+ the beginnings of a brand
+ positive reputation with industry
+ presumably a list of people willing to pay to watch pool
- a pool studio for video taping and live streaming that is expensive to maintain and is under utilized
- lack of capitalization
- an unproven and questionable entertainment format. By this I mean that if the PGA (probably the best capitalized individual sport on TV) developed a TAR like approach and tried to sell a three day one on one match between Adam Scott #2 in the world and Henrik Stenson #3 in the world where you watched them play from hole to hole for 3 straight rounds very few people would be interested. Especially if it was pay per view. And I am talking Golf & #2 versus #3 in the world, so, why would it work for pool?
Bonus Ball
+ reasonably well capitalized
+ interesting proposition of team competition that may lend itself better to TV for the masses
- a pool studio for video taping and live streaming that is expensive to maintain and under utilized
- lack of street cred
- questionable understanding of the industry
- poor industry relations due to rocky and somewhat aggressive launch
I lived in the air-conditioned, carpeted jungle of a Fortune 500 company for quite a while. Despite the dog eat dog environment one thing remained constant... leave your ego at the door and figure out how to make money. The venture had to succeed in order to pay all the salaries, bonuses & such that supported your lifestyle. This "group success focus" in order for individuals to prosper oftentimes led to compromise and strange bed fellows. And, it almost always led to profits and success.
Look at XM & Sirius satellite radio.... absolute competitors trying to drive each other out of business that merged to try to survive. Look at all the mergers in corporate America. Groups and individuals compromise and enemies join forces to survive and prosper. When 2 organizations have complimenting strengths and weaknesses there is much to be gained by joining forces to expand strengths and eliminate redundancies.
Why shouldn't "planet pool" work the same way as mainstream business? If it was an MBA program exercise where the background and current status of TAR and Bonus Ball was presented as a business problem there would be a compelling argument to merge the two and utilized the complimentary strengths of the organizations and people involved.
The one thing that is clear to me is that an entity made up of TAR and Bonus Ball would have far more to bring to market and far superior skill sets and resources than either have today individually.
It most likely won't happen... it is hard. It takes great effort and a greater amount of humility to listen, compromise and cooperate.
Something to think about
Last edited: