Challenge of Champions dump

Even if I never even heard of the Dump and seen the video, missing the
8 could of been a slight miscue and even believable if that was said but wasn't.
Missing the 8-9 combo was so crap and blatant, he made sure that 9 didn't
go anywhere near the pocket.

Defending Buddy cause he's a friend or a pool hero to some shows true
love for the guy, but it also shows disregard to the others that lost
there money and truly love not just the players but the game itself.
 
Not to split hairs here but I thought Buddy did a good acting job considering the circumstances.Buddy had a tough job to do with SM struggling.

Consider the 8 ball shot,If Buddy draws back for shape on the 9 he will leave SM an easier shot on the 8 but if he rattles the 8 then he might hook him if he draws behind the 9.

Don't really have an opinion on the dump, but if it were such, why wouldn't Buddy just hit the seven ball a touch fat? Why would he go to the trouble of trying to hit a perfect shot to both make the 7-ball and scratch in the side? Seems like a high risk way to go about it when all he had to do was hit the seven fat, draw the cue all to the rail, and leave Mike an easy layout.
 
Don't really have an opinion on the dump, but if it were such, why wouldn't Buddy just hit the seven ball a touch fat? Why would he go to the trouble of trying to hit a perfect shot to both make the 7-ball and scratch in the side? Seems like a high risk way to go about it when all he had to do was hit the seven fat, draw the cue all to the rail, and leave Mike an easy layout.

Don't interject a real player's analysis here. Obviously Buddy was trying the super low percentage scratch instead of leaving himself a really tough combination to dog.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
 
Well.... for the sake of discussion...keep in mind that this is simply a discussion.

Jay's statements are inconsistent. In one of them he indicates that he "knew something was up but was powerless to do something about it" when refereeing the finals.

Now, as referee for the event and as plugged-in as Jay seems you would think that he would have seen the dumping previously and put a stop to it before the finals. So it appears that perhaps Jay did not actually know anything prior to the finals.

That said all you have is his observation from the finals and whatever conversation he reports having with the manager of the sports book afterward. Hardly conclusive evidence of a dump.

As for Earl, what was his alleged statement again? And is this statement on record FROM him or is it someone else saying that Earl said something?

IF Earl says that he was asked to dump then that is certainly a possibility. But that doesn't mean that there WAS a subsequent dump. In any event it would be Earl's testimony against seven other people. I am not saying Earl is lying, I am saying Earl has no first hand knowledge that a dump occurred and we don't have as far as I know any statement from Earl himself accusing his fellow professionals of felonies.

And to be clear, what we are talking about here are felonies. Fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Probably the statute of limitations has run out on it but these are actual crimes you all want to put on the shoulders of Buddy Hall, Mike Lebron, Nick Varner and the other players who were allegedly a part of this.

I didn't know anything for sure until it was over, but there were already rumors of bets being made on Lebron prior to the event starting. I had my suspicions and then the last match kind of made it conclusive for me. But the real evidence was yet to come. After I heard the whole story I knew for certain what had transpired. Maybe these guys are mad at me for snitching on them but I wasn't the only one who knew. Ask Allen Hopkins? He knows but is too diplomatic to speak publicly.

Like I said it really makes no difference now and I'm not without sin myself. But this was different, pool on national TV with serious money on the line. Very poor judgement to do business in that spot. They all should have known better and only one player did.
 
It's NOT a rematch between Buddy and Mike, that's for sure. LoL :smash:

Thats to bad. That would be fun. We could make it booze pool, every time someone tanks a shot they have to pound a margarita. A race to 3 would be sufficient

..... or bumper pool....
 
I didn't know anything for sure until it was over, but there were already rumors of bets being made on Lebron prior to the event starting. I had my suspicions and then the last match kind of made it conclusive for me. But the real evidence was yet to come. After I heard the whole story I knew for certain what had transpired. Maybe these guys are mad at me for snitching on them but I wasn't the only one who knew. Ask Allen Hopkins? He knows but is too diplomatic to speak publicly.

Like I said it really makes no difference now and I'm not without sin myself. But this was different, pool on national TV with serious money on the line. Very poor judgement to do business in that spot. They all should have known better and only one player did.

Why is it such a big deal in your eyes?
 
just shows how stupid the pro players are. they already had the 50,000 split up. so to get 20 to 1 instead of say 6 to one on a great player who could take it off and wouldnt be suspect winning, they get greedy and put the worst player up to win.

after they see he is dogging it they just need to beat him and forget about the side bet. but they are so stupid and greedy they have to make themselves look like thieves for it all.
 
Mike Lebron wins the US OPEN at 54 Years Old...the oldest in history at this time

Mike Lebron was not the underdog in this tournament, not by a "long shot" - to make him 20/1 against the field in races to 7 is ludicrous......he played as well as any player in the tournament, and if there's any finger pointing it should be towards whom ever made that line......and they had the line at 20/1 for weeks? This is very, very, very difficult to believe. He won major titles in finals against the likes of Earl Strickland, Nick Varner, Johnny Archer and Buddy Hall.

For those of you that may not know who "Spanish Mike" is and his credentials, check this out.....remember, he's the one that was with Efren every day for many years touring around America and translating.

Mike Lebrón
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Mike Lebron)



Miguel Benjamin Lebrón-Laboy (born March 31, 1934, Yabucoa, Puerto Rico), best known as Mike Lebrón (sometimes rendered Mike Lebron in the media) is a Puerto Rican professional pool player nicknamed "Spanish Mike".[1]

Lebrón currently lives in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and actively competes at various pocket billiard events.

Contents [hide]
1 Professional career
2 Titles and achievements
3 References
4 External links
Professional career[edit]
Lebrón is the winner of the thirteenth edition of the US Open Nine-ball Championship.[2] Lebrón won the title against Nick Varner in 1988 and is the only Puerto Rican-born professional pool player to win the prestigious title. He is also the oldest pool player to have ever won the US Open Nine-Ball Championship for men at the age of 54 or older.

On February 19, 2006, in his hometown of Yabucoa, Puerto Rico, Lebrón was inducted into the Yabucoa Sports Hall of Fame Pavilion (Pabellón de la Fama del Deporte Yabucoeño). The induction ceremonies took place on June 11, 2006.[3]

Lebrón is a member of the International Pool Tour.[4]

Titles and achievements[edit]
1992 – Glass City Open Champion - Finals against Earl Strickland
1991 – International Challenge of Champions
1990 – Glass City Open Champion - Finals against Johnny Archer
1988 – US Open Nine-ball Championship against Nick Varner
1988 – Pool Hall Open
1986 – Sun Coast Open
References[edit]
Jump up ^ "Player Profile", AzBilliards.com. Retrieved 23 October 2007
Jump up ^ USOpen9ballChampsionships.com. Retrieved 23 October 2007
Jump up ^ FedBillarpr.bravehost.com. Retrieved 23 October 2007
Jump up ^ Player Bio, InternationalPoolTour.com. Retrieved 23 October 2007




just shows how stupid the pro players are. they already had the 50,000 split up. so to get 20 to 1 instead of say 6 to one on a great player who could take it off and wouldnt be suspect winning, they get greedy and put the worst player up to win.

after they see he is dogging it they just need to beat him and forget about the side bet. but they are so stupid and greedy they have to make themselves look like thieves for it all.
 
The PCA (professional cue sports association) did all the men's ESPN Events (except for Matt Braun's events) between 96 and 99.....this equaled thousands of international hours of coverage (the WPBA did several evens as well, and we did one big one together). We also did several events on PRIME SPORTS as well.

Gary Morgenstein of ESPN told me I was on ESPN over 600 hours myself in those years......granted these weren't all "prime time" spots, but they were a HUGE commercial for pocket billiards and the entire industry benefited considerably.

CJ, you have a idea of what happened? What's your opinion?
 
John,

Here are Earl's alleged statements according to R.H. Gilmer, room owner, on the Southern Billiards site.

After watching the video we can all see that Mr. Gilmer's recollection of events is a little off but that doesn't change his recollection of the conversation with Earl.


ONB
Thanks for the legwork. I believe the professor is beyond repute.

(Rip)
 
Not to split hairs here but I thought Buddy did a good acting job considering the circumstances.Buddy had a tough job to do with SM struggling.

Consider the 8 ball shot,If Buddy draws back for shape on the 9 he will leave SM an easier shot on the 8 but if he rattles the 8 then he might hook him if he draws behind the 9.

Its seems for some reason, that players who are well known to dump, are also the worse actors while doing it. I know of a couple that backs this claim up, as they would wake up the dead while dumping. You would think after the first 100, they would have it down pat , instead they get worse!
 
Its seems for some reason, that players who are well known to dump, are also the worse actors while doing it. I know of a couple that backs this claim up, as they would wake up the dead while dumping. You would think after the first 100, they would have it down pat , instead they get worse!

I have never heard that buddy nick mike Sigel David Howard jim rempe or Mike LeBron are known to dump.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
 
The 'Challenge of Champions' went on to become the longest running ESPN Event

CJ, you have a idea of what happened? What's your opinion?

There was a history between Earl and Mike Lebron....I like both of them, but this feud wasn't "fun and games," it was serious....almost deadly serious - I'll leave it at that.

We never understood the 20/1 odds and why they ("Vegas"} would keep this ludicrous line up on the board.....especially for more than a day or two. This seemed very odd, and if you know how Vegas operates, they seldom make such a lopsided line and keep it....they usually change it asap.

I attended several meetings with the PBTA about this issue, and was outspoken about allowing these "winner take all" tournaments.....I didn't believe they were fair to the players and encouraged "savers".....how can you ask a player to go through such a field, get to the finals and get paid $0 for finishing 2nd? I still believe that's seriously flawed and will systematically cause problems that should be avoided at all costs.

After being right in the middle of this issue politically I still can't be sure what happened, all I know is there's more to this that I choose to keep to myself. The amount of money that was supposedly won has been exaggerated, and other "facts" have been changed over the years. There was never any suggestion of an investigation over the 'Challenge of Champions' so everyone was cleared of any "wrong doing". People can argue this point all they want and it's like the OJ Simpson case, "did he do it, or didn't he do it" - either way, it's old news and has no baring on the future of pool.

This event certainly wasn't a positive event for professional pool, and on the same note, wasn't negative either. The 'Challenge of Champions' went on to become the longest running ESPN Event and paid out close to a million dollars over the years. Buddy went on to win the US OPEN and I think he may have even been close to the same age as Mike Lebron when he won in 98.

The next few years in Pro Pool were instrumental and if a few things had been different we may have broken through......our PCA tour did some incredible things, but was cut short by Earl's 11 rack run in Dallas Texas....of course that's another story. ;) 'The Game is the Teacher'
 
Last edited:
We never understood the 20/1 odds and why they ("Vegas"} would keep this ludicrous line up on the board.....especially for more than a day or two. This seemed very odd, and if you know how Vegas operates, they seldom make such a lopsided line and keep it....they usually change it asap.
So, now you're saying that Vegas was in on the dump?

toetap05.gif
 
no what he is really saying he is defending all the players as he doesnt want things like that known about players or pool.

as far as vegas lines and what they do he has no idea and is just giving an uninformed opinion.

mike was dogging it badly. no one said he wasnt a good player and didnt belong there. he wasnt one of the top in the field though.
 
"Buddy sure played bad didn't he?" is all that would have been said.

So, now you're saying that Vegas was in on the dump?

toetap05.gif

If "Vegas" hadn't made such a ludicrous line we would not be talking about this in any way, shape or form.

That's what I'm saying and it's absolutely correct.....Buddy could have missed every shot and no one would have ever said anything other than "Buddy sure played bad didn't he?"

It's the alleged (inside info) betting that got all this attention, not the tournament itself.

Why would Vegas put a line up on a third tier sport and leave it up for more than a day or two? This virtually never happens, the line always moves one way or another as soon as any bets are made (either way).
 
Back
Top