Maybe next year have the four groups set by country/region. I.E. group A (4 players from Taiwan/Asia) group B (4 players from Philipines) group C (4 players from Europe) group D (4 players from N. America). Ensuring a representative from each region in the semi-finals.
You know with Lou making a post that he talked with Mark and SJM now saying that he talked to Mark. Let me say what I think is happening with all this.
This is a fishing expedition.
Mark messed up period and what he is doing now is testing the waters through things
he is saying to others and when the posts appear Mark gets to watch the reactions
but not be held accountable for what is said in case it still doesn't fly.
It still doesn’t fly.
This line in particular strikes me as pure rubbish.
"Mark Griffin was blindsided here, forced to make a difficult decision without sufficient time to consider the matter at length”
How was Mark blindsided anymore with this withdrawal than with hundreds of others
he's been blindsided with before ? -----> Answer, he wasn't.
Why is this considered a difficult decision ? Answer, it wasn't. No show = Forfeit =Bye
Always has.
Why wasn't there sufficient time ? --------> Answer, there was this is something that he's done a hundred times.
Conclusion, the line in quotes above is designed only to give Mark wiggle room
in an instance where he was clearly wrong.
Let's say Mark did feel all the pressure of being blindsided and forced to decide on the clock so to speak to make difficult a decision.
What does one do in this instance ? -------> Answer, they fall back on their past experience.
If you're a player, that would be your practice.
If you're the guy running things Mark, you would fall back on practices you have used
through out the years running tournaments.
Which is ————> NO SHOW = FORFEIT = BYE
By by "reporter” banditgrrr
Words directly from Mark's mouth was "we made a decision to put Shane in that spot because the people paying for the stream paid to watch matches and we're not going to have a forfeit."
In this statement Mark is stating that it should have been a forfeit, so he knew what should have been done, but he was going to do what he wanted.
Simply wrong. This still smells.
============
Quick question - has Ralf forfeited his match with Dennis wouldn't Shane have advanced and none of the controversy occurred? If so what was his rational for playing the match then other than for extra money? Given Ralf's rep it doesn't add up
lol. Maybe with your help we can get this on "Conspiracy Theory" with Jesse Ventura.
There is no "testing the waters" or "fishing expedition" going on and you do not have so much as a scintilla of evidence to support such a wild claim. It is just your speculation.
Mark is busy with huge tournaments and thousands of players and will then have to oversee that wrap up of hundreds of tables at the Rio that were brought in. He will provide his explanation in due course. Hold your water. If it'll make it easier for you I'll tell you some stories about Roswell, Hanger 18, and Area 51.
Lou Figueroa
Quick question - has Ralf forfeited his match with Dennis wouldn't Shane have advanced and none of the controversy occurred? If so what was his rational for playing the match then other than for extra money? Given Ralf's rep it doesn't add up
Anyone see Ralf get on the 7pm flight? What was the difference in purse money if Dennis beats Ralf? I believe there is a reason Ralf left the tournament.
And that is why the Taiwanese players don't like to come to the US to play. The language barrier makes them easy to manipulate. On the other hand, most of the Asian countries treat the Taiwanese players like celebrities when they go play in their country.
Where is the moral ground for someone who bet that Ko Pin-Yi would win the event? Answer: there isn't any because the event was rigged in a way that denied him a berth in the final he'd already earned. The producers already compromised the moral integrity of the event, and Shane had an opportunity to regain some of it back, even though you can't see that this is true. Still, it's a matter of opinion and I respect yours.
Still, if Mark is empowered to make the rules, why did he give Shane, who did not outperform Dechaine or Appleton in the round robin section of the event, the berth in the semis. They, like Shane, went 2-1 but were eliminated. Whatever the reason, intended or not, this was a case of favoritism toward Shane and abuse and bullying of Ko Pin-Yi, one of the world's greatest players. That Ko, who competed with near perfection in both his play and his conduct, was mistreated in this way, is truly horrific.
The posted brackets at the Rio had Ko vs Souquet and Baby Ko vs Hohmann. A walkover is not at all uncommon in sports. If your opponent doesn't show, you win. It's not uncommon in either match play golf or in tennis. Pool has long wanted to be like those sports, but this incident reminds us that our game lacks the integrity that is the backbone of those sports.
Ralf shouldn't have played in the event. It's really that simple. However, the fact that Mark did not penalize him for a no show in the semis but threatened Ko with nonpayment of prize moneys earned (a big dose of moral injustice that you are apparently fine with) will always stand out as an atrocity to me.
Moneywise, this was the first tournament ever in which five players came in the top four. It will become a trivia question soon enough, one that I'll be able to answer for certain because I'll never forget what I witnessed on July 25, 2014 at the CSI 8-ball championship.
As far as I see it,it is all of the negativity that is the
problem with pool these days.We seen lots of GREAT
pool this past week and someone always has to find
the negative side of it.If anyone thinks they can d better
reach in your pocket and get after it.
Thanks for the live stream it was enjoyable and you can't
please everyone all the time
Poor decisions made by Ralf as a pro player and Mark as a pro promoter.
But now the bigger question: Was there indeed a threat of "no play no pay" made to Ko? Unfortunately we may never find out...
I wouldn't be surprised if the Taiwanese pros never want anything to do with CSI in the future after this incident. And that's a shame because clearly CSI benefited greatly by having a good relationship with them. The Taiwanese pros have enough money games and tourneys around Asia, and definitely a lot more respect. They certainly don't need any of the hot mess this incident has created.
All I can say is that I'm glad I wasn't there. I had flown home the night before for an important meeting with the city of Carson, CA. It all sounds like a total mess for everyone involved. So many differing opinions, all coming from people who I respect, leads me to believe there is no easy answer to this situation.
My feeling is it's over and done with, and let it go at that. All of the principals involved will learn a lesson in the future. I don't want to get involved in deciding who's right and who's wrong here. Let's just say they are all 'right' and all 'wrong' at the same time. No one can be the winner in a situation like this. Everyone loses when there is no clear correct way to handle something.
Sometimes you just have to man up and admit there was a fuc-up and let it go at that. Everyone involved has equal responsibility for the individual decisions they made during this incident. I wouldn't be so quick to point my finger at anyone! Sometimes it can be very difficult to decide the right thing to do in the heat of the moment. We are not all Solomon wise!
I don't think any of the parties involved acted with malice. It all happened somewhat in the spur of the moment and sometimes we say and do things on the fly that we would not have done given time to contemplate. ALL of us have done that and we know it. I can't you how many times I have said (or not said) something that I regretted later.
I will tell you this, there have been times as a tournament director, that a fair decision during a game was impossible to make and that I asked the players who broke the balls. When they told me I said "Rack 'em up and start the game over!"![]()
So right. Sometimes a simple "Im sorry, I effed up. Ill be better next time", is so much better. But to suggest that to "dump" a way out or that Orcollo "dumped" is the real corrupt thought.
We all have thanks to what CSI and Mr Griffin is doing. Tish happens. So lets get on with it and look forward to 2015.
true. Ko probably said after they put Shane on, "whatever. let's play."
What reasoning makes you state this?
The storyline coming out of this event was supposed to be the emergence of the Taiwanese players on a big American stage. Their strong play, rumored to us for years, was codified in our eyes by their brilliant play over the course of this tournament.
Instead, we are left with a terrible taste in our mouths as a result of this mess.
The Chinese have been loath to travel here for major events. It is a long way for them to get over here, and there is much more "incentive" (money and prestige) back overseas.
After the treatment of Ko this past week, I would be surprised if they would elect to participate in any events such as this in the future.
He's almost convinced me of his position! If he tries a fourth font style, size, or color in his next post, I just might see the light!