SJM's Slant on the CSI 8-ball Scandal

Johnnyt

Anyone see Ralf get on the 7pm flight? What was the difference in purse money if Dennis beats Ralf? I believe there is a reason Ralf left the tournament.
 
Maybe next year have the four groups set by country/region. I.E. group A (4 players from Taiwan/Asia) group B (4 players from Philipines) group C (4 players from Europe) group D (4 players from N. America). Ensuring a representative from each region in the semi-finals.


I hear you, and that would make it a kind of country vs. country match which would be cool. But the problem is that it would further encourage shenanigans in the round robin stage.

I'm starting to feel like elimination-style tournaments are just the better choice for a variety of reasons.
 
You know with Lou making a post that he talked with Mark and SJM now saying that he talked to Mark. Let me say what I think is happening with all this.
This is a fishing expedition.

Mark messed up period and what he is doing now is testing the waters through things
he is saying to others and when the posts appear Mark gets to watch the reactions
but not be held accountable for what is said in case it still doesn't fly.
It still doesn’t fly.

This line in particular strikes me as pure rubbish.

"Mark Griffin was blindsided here, forced to make a difficult decision without sufficient time to consider the matter at length”


How was Mark blindsided anymore with this withdrawal than with hundreds of others
he's been blindsided with before ? -----> Answer, he wasn't.

Why is this considered a difficult decision ? Answer, it wasn't. No show = Forfeit =Bye
Always has.

Why wasn't there sufficient time ? --------> Answer, there was this is something that he's done a hundred times.

Conclusion, the line in quotes above is designed only to give Mark wiggle room
in an instance where he was clearly wrong.

Let's say Mark did feel all the pressure of being blindsided and forced to decide on the clock so to speak to make difficult a decision.

What does one do in this instance ? -------> Answer, they fall back on their past experience.

If you're a player, that would be your practice.
If you're the guy running things Mark, you would fall back on practices you have used
through out the years running tournaments.
Which is ————> NO SHOW = FORFEIT = BYE

By by "reporter” banditgrrr

Words directly from Mark's mouth was "we made a decision to put Shane in that spot because the people paying for the stream paid to watch matches and we're not going to have a forfeit."

In this statement Mark is stating that it should have been a forfeit, so he knew what should have been done, but he was going to do what he wanted.
Simply wrong. This still smells.

============


lol. Maybe with your help we can get this on "Conspiracy Theory" with Jesse Ventura.

There is no "testing the waters" or "fishing expedition" going on and you do not have so much as a scintilla of evidence to support such a wild claim. It is just your speculation.

Mark is busy with huge tournaments and thousands of players and will then have to oversee that wrap up of hundreds of tables at the Rio that were brought in. He will provide his explanation in due course. Hold your water. If it'll make it easier for you I'll tell you some stories about Roswell, Hanger 18, and Area 51.

Lou Figueroa
 
Quick question - has Ralf forfeited his match with Dennis wouldn't Shane have advanced and none of the controversy occurred? If so what was his rational for playing the match then other than for extra money? Given Ralf's rep it doesn't add up

One must conclude that Ralf wanted 3rd place money rather than 5th place money and wasn't prepared to forfeit the difference in prize money. Seem to recall that you got $750 per match won if you were eliminated in the round robin, so had Ralf forfeited to Dennis, he'd have gone 1-2 and collected a total of $750 in the event. In contrast, he was paid 3rd place money, which I believe was $2,500. Hence, the cost of the forfeit would have been $1,750, not a figure to sniff at.
 
He's almost convinced me of his position! If he tries a fourth font style, size, or color in his next post, I just might see the light!

lol. Maybe with your help we can get this on "Conspiracy Theory" with Jesse Ventura.

There is no "testing the waters" or "fishing expedition" going on and you do not have so much as a scintilla of evidence to support such a wild claim. It is just your speculation.

Mark is busy with huge tournaments and thousands of players and will then have to oversee that wrap up of hundreds of tables at the Rio that were brought in. He will provide his explanation in due course. Hold your water. If it'll make it easier for you I'll tell you some stories about Roswell, Hanger 18, and Area 51.

Lou Figueroa
 
Quick question - has Ralf forfeited his match with Dennis wouldn't Shane have advanced and none of the controversy occurred? If so what was his rational for playing the match then other than for extra money? Given Ralf's rep it doesn't add up

Anyone see Ralf get on the 7pm flight? What was the difference in purse money if Dennis beats Ralf? I believe there is a reason Ralf left the tournament.

Ralf had worst rack differential -5 after 2 matches. If he forfeit or lost to Orcollo hill hill in last match, Ralf would be bottom of table. Shane would win group followed up Orcollo and Cheng and lastly Ralf
Prizemoney for 8 ball event same as for 10 ball event
http://www.azbilliards.com/tours_an...vitational-10-ball-championship-2014/results/

Which means Ralf would have gotten $500 for bottom of table but if he wins group and gets into semifinals he gets at least $2500 so an extra $2000. There is talk that CSI offered extra $250 for final match win so Ralf purse could have been $2750

There was mention by a source that Ralf got the cheque bit we do not know how much.. was it for full $2750 ? Shane was 2nd in group and won his last group match that means he gets about $1750. He was runner up to Baby Ko and it is $5250 for runner up. If Ralf got $2750 Shane's share would be $2500 plus his own 2nd in group prize $1750 so Shane gets about $4250
But it is not confirmed that Ralf really got the cheque. :grin:
 
All I can say is that I'm glad I wasn't there. I had flown home the night before for an important meeting with the city of Carson, CA. It all sounds like a total mess for everyone involved. So many differing opinions, all coming from people who I respect, leads me to believe there is no easy answer to this situation.

My feeling is it's over and done with, and let it go at that. All of the principals involved will learn a lesson in the future. I don't want to get involved in deciding who's right and who's wrong here. Let's just say they are all 'right' and all 'wrong' at the same time. No one can be the winner in a situation like this. Everyone loses when there is no clear correct way to handle something.

Sometimes you just have to man up and admit there was a fuc-up and let it go at that. Everyone involved has equal responsibility for the individual decisions they made during this incident. I wouldn't be so quick to point my finger at anyone! Sometimes it can be very difficult to decide the right thing to do in the heat of the moment. We are not all Solomon wise!

I don't think any of the parties involved acted with malice. It all happened somewhat in the spur of the moment and sometimes we say and do things on the fly that we would not have done given time to contemplate. ALL of us have done that and we know it. I can't tell you how many times I have said (or not said) something that I regretted later.

I will tell you this, there have been times as a tournament director, that a fair decision during a game was impossible to make and that I asked the players who broke the balls. When they told me I said "Rack 'em up and start the game over!" :D
 
Last edited:
And that is why the Taiwanese players don't like to come to the US to play. The language barrier makes them easy to manipulate. On the other hand, most of the Asian countries treat the Taiwanese players like celebrities when they go play in their country.

true. Ko probably said after they put Shane on, "whatever. let's play."
 
Where is the moral ground for someone who bet that Ko Pin-Yi would win the event? Answer: there isn't any because the event was rigged in a way that denied him a berth in the final he'd already earned. The producers already compromised the moral integrity of the event, and Shane had an opportunity to regain some of it back, even though you can't see that this is true. Still, it's a matter of opinion and I respect yours.

Still, if Mark is empowered to make the rules, why did he give Shane, who did not outperform Dechaine or Appleton in the round robin section of the event, the berth in the semis. They, like Shane, went 2-1 but were eliminated. Whatever the reason, intended or not, this was a case of favoritism toward Shane and abuse and bullying of Ko Pin-Yi, one of the world's greatest players. That Ko, who competed with near perfection in both his play and his conduct, was mistreated in this way, is truly horrific.

The posted brackets at the Rio had Ko vs Souquet and Baby Ko vs Hohmann. A walkover is not at all uncommon in sports. If your opponent doesn't show, you win. It's not uncommon in either match play golf or in tennis. Pool has long wanted to be like those sports, but this incident reminds us that our game lacks the integrity that is the backbone of those sports.

Ralf shouldn't have played in the event. It's really that simple. However, the fact that Mark did not penalize him for a no show in the semis but threatened Ko with nonpayment of prize moneys earned (a big dose of moral injustice that you are apparently fine with) will always stand out as an atrocity to me.

Moneywise, this was the first tournament ever in which five players came in the top four. It will become a trivia question soon enough, one that I'll be able to answer for certain because I'll never forget what I witnessed on July 25, 2014 at the CSI 8-ball championship.

Don't put words in my mouth. I don't agree Ko should be forced to play. It is not a moral injustice that I am fine with. If it was me, an American, I would not and see Mr Griffin in court. But since Ko is not I can understand his dilemma. Get off your high horse.
And what "truth" am I unwilling to see? A Dump is a Dump and youre advocating that. If Shane did that it is he that should be banned from play not others who have upset Mark so.
It is not a matter of opinion so you don't have to agree with me or respect me in any way. A Dump suggestion is not to be respected. Im sorry you might be a great person or a great supporter of pool but to suggest a Dump is out of line. No sanctioning body would allow it. But this is not a sanctioned event by any other than Mr Griffin. Im not against him or you. I just want to call it like it is. Its Marks deal so he can call it like he sees it. Right or Wrong it doesn't matter does it?
Look Ive been around pool since the 60's and seen a lot of dumps. I was there when they dumped Phil Spector and every one knew it was going on. A dump for profit or for politics is the worse solution to the problem. The best thing for Shane was to walk away and say Im going back to South Dakota, I have a plane to catch, you play him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TCo
I definitely see the possibility of players corroborating in the group stages BRRussell. Maybe they should consider a full round robin. That way the fans get to see every possible match up. Each players plays 15 matches. Could easily be done with playing 3 matches a day over 5 days.
 
Poor decisions made by Ralf as a pro player and Mark as a pro promoter.

But now the bigger question: Was there indeed a threat of "no play no pay" made to Ko? Unfortunately we may never find out...

I wouldn't be surprised if the Taiwanese pros never want anything to do with CSI in the future after this incident. And that's a shame because clearly CSI benefited greatly by having a good relationship with them. The Taiwanese pros have enough money games and tourneys around Asia, and definitely a lot more respect. They certainly don't need any of the hot mess this incident has created.
 
As far as I see it,it is all of the negativity that is the
problem with pool these days.We seen lots of GREAT
pool this past week and someone always has to find
the negative side of it.If anyone thinks they can d better
reach in your pocket and get after it.
Thanks for the live stream it was enjoyable and you can't
please everyone all the time

Ya and we saw even better pool and better streaming in the world events all on the up and up and free to boot


1
 
Poor decisions made by Ralf as a pro player and Mark as a pro promoter.

But now the bigger question: Was there indeed a threat of "no play no pay" made to Ko? Unfortunately we may never find out...

I wouldn't be surprised if the Taiwanese pros never want anything to do with CSI in the future after this incident. And that's a shame because clearly CSI benefited greatly by having a good relationship with them. The Taiwanese pros have enough money games and tourneys around Asia, and definitely a lot more respect. They certainly don't need any of the hot mess this incident has created.

Also may have ripple effect on other players in attendance. Ralf and Orcollo unlikely to come back. Other remaining 5 players may be spooked.
If they have 2nd edition next year (and that is an IF), they probably have better luck getting other players who did not come this year like Mika, Niels, Lee Van, etc :grin-square:
 
Last edited:
All I can say is that I'm glad I wasn't there. I had flown home the night before for an important meeting with the city of Carson, CA. It all sounds like a total mess for everyone involved. So many differing opinions, all coming from people who I respect, leads me to believe there is no easy answer to this situation.

My feeling is it's over and done with, and let it go at that. All of the principals involved will learn a lesson in the future. I don't want to get involved in deciding who's right and who's wrong here. Let's just say they are all 'right' and all 'wrong' at the same time. No one can be the winner in a situation like this. Everyone loses when there is no clear correct way to handle something.

Sometimes you just have to man up and admit there was a fuc-up and let it go at that. Everyone involved has equal responsibility for the individual decisions they made during this incident. I wouldn't be so quick to point my finger at anyone! Sometimes it can be very difficult to decide the right thing to do in the heat of the moment. We are not all Solomon wise!

I don't think any of the parties involved acted with malice. It all happened somewhat in the spur of the moment and sometimes we say and do things on the fly that we would not have done given time to contemplate. ALL of us have done that and we know it. I can't you how many times I have said (or not said) something that I regretted later.

I will tell you this, there have been times as a tournament director, that a fair decision during a game was impossible to make and that I asked the players who broke the balls. When they told me I said "Rack 'em up and start the game over!" :D

So right. Sometimes a simple "Im sorry, I effed up. Ill be better next time", is so much better. But to suggest that to "dump" a way out or that Orcollo "dumped" is the real corrupt thought.
We all have thanks to what CSI and Mr Griffin is doing. Tish happens. So lets get on with it and look forward to 2015.
 
So right. Sometimes a simple "Im sorry, I effed up. Ill be better next time", is so much better. But to suggest that to "dump" a way out or that Orcollo "dumped" is the real corrupt thought.
We all have thanks to what CSI and Mr Griffin is doing. Tish happens. So lets get on with it and look forward to 2015.

Indeed.... :thumbup:
 
The storyline coming out of this event was supposed to be the emergence of the Taiwanese players on a big American stage. Their strong play, rumored to us for years, was codified in our eyes by their brilliant play over the course of this tournament.

Instead, we are left with a terrible taste in our mouths as a result of this mess.

The Chinese have been loath to travel here for major events. It is a long way for them to get over here, and there is much more "incentive" (money and prestige) back overseas.

After the treatment of Ko this past week, I would be surprised if they would elect to participate in any events such as this in the future.
 
The storyline coming out of this event was supposed to be the emergence of the Taiwanese players on a big American stage. Their strong play, rumored to us for years, was codified in our eyes by their brilliant play over the course of this tournament.

Instead, we are left with a terrible taste in our mouths as a result of this mess.

The Chinese have been loath to travel here for major events. It is a long way for them to get over here, and there is much more "incentive" (money and prestige) back overseas.

After the treatment of Ko this past week, I would be surprised if they would elect to participate in any events such as this in the future.

Honestly, aside from the US Open 10 Ball last year, there isn't any events that are I consider "big American stage." While that field was tough, the prize money was only 15,000. Chang Jung Lin came to the US Open 9 ball two years ago and quietly placed 5th. I believe that was his first time coming to the US, and probably one of the first few times he ever touched a Diamond table. Ko, I believe was there too. There was a streamed match of him that year earlier in the tournament when David Alcaide played perfect pool and beat him. While the US Open 9 Ball may seem like a big prestigious event here in the US, it probably doesn't mean as much to the Asian players aside from the prize money.
 
Back
Top