Kiln vs. Air dried playability

Joe,

The question should be, at what price and to what ends should one set his standards to continually strive to raise the bar of expectations of what is considered world class.

When one does what other refuse to do concerning baseline standards only then can they appreciate the effect of gains measured in degrees of less than 1%.

I understand your point of view because you don't build cues anymore. I have seen your shafts that you sell and they are very nice indeed. How is it that you can put aside the notion that there is not a much higher standard to be contemplated..

Neil said it right when he mentioned that you can get to a point whereby sanding can only make the contour finish worse. That standard is known to those who never lose site of the goal to always strive to raise that bar and never refuse to seek even the tinniest incremental improvement. Just saying, without that type of critical thinking the past looks exactly like the future. Wouldn't you agree?

Add tool push off to your list of buzz words Joe. Tool push off is something that is real when machining thin tapered wood shafts. If you can counteract that force why not use the force gravity? Makes sense to me. Anyone who is familiar with the sounds of a shaft being cut would totally agree that the sound coming off my machine using the rest is a constant sound with no oscillation or bounce. When the shaft is miced up and down and around the cone the dimension numbers don't lie.


JMO,

Rick






Rick…

I don’t want to get into a pissing contest here but I agree with parts of what you state. We should always challenge ourselves but ----- at what point do we go from the ridiculous to the sublime?

I never put aside the ”notion that there is not a much higher standard to be contemplated”. At what point is there perfection? There cannot be perfection to the twenty seventh power. You either have perfection or you don’t. I believe you have not attained perfection even with all your buzz words and with my joking about your buzz words and others buzz words as well.

We cut perfect shafts without any outside influence such as you have with your Teflon contraption which I do admit is ingenious. Great idea! However, we have no use for it as we attain perfection without the use of such a fixture. The fact that you use it compensates for a short coming of the basic set-up which is producing the issue and why you need the fixture. It’s 100% ok and acceptable; I’m not castigating you there or anywhere. You’ve fine-tuned the machine to work for you at a higher level and that’s fantastic. You found a work-a-round which generates perfection.

As far as attaining perfection, I don’t think you have because perfection in my books is final and finished. When your shafts are finished being cut, they are ” Shinny and burnished shafts after the machining is the goal. They need a sanding just to open the grain to accept or wick the sealer into the wood”. We do not want that much perfection. We want one step before that perfection because you’re going backwards. You achieved perfection but your perfection needs to be brought back to less perfection where you can then sand and seal them to final perfection that you initially had but not really.

Phew! You got a great set-up! And I'm screwing with you a little so lighten up. :-)
 
Last edited:
Rick…

I don’t want to get into a pissing contest here but I agree with parts of what you state. We should always challenge ourselves but ----- at what point do we go from the ridiculous to the sublime?

I never put aside the ”notion that there is not a much higher standard to be contemplated”. At what point is there perfection? There cannot be perfection to the twenty seventh power. You either have perfection or you don’t. I believe you have not attained perfection even with all your buzz words and with my joking about your buzz words and others buzz words as well.

We cut perfect shafts without any outside influence such as you have with your Teflon contraption which I do admit is ingenious. Great idea! However, we have no use for it as we attain perfection without the use of such a fixture. The fact that you use it compensates for a short coming of the basic set-up which is producing the issue and why you need the fixture. It’s 100% ok and acceptable; I’m not castigating you there or anywhere. You’ve fine-tuned the machine to work for you at a higher level and that’s fantastic. You found a work-a-round which generates perfection.

As far as attaining perfection, I don’t think you have because perfection in my books is final and finished. When your shafts are finished being cut, they are ” Shinny and burnished shafts after the machining is the goal. They need a sanding just to open the grain to accept or wick the sealer into the wood”. We do not want that much perfection. We want one step before that perfection because you’re going backwards. You achieved perfection but your perfection needs to be brought back to less perfection where you can then sand and seal them to final perfection that you initially had but not really.

Phew! You got a great set-up! And I'm screwing with you a little so lighten up. :-)

No pissing Joe and I always respect your experience and candor. I did ask you your opinion concerning wood shock.

I know there is always some tongue and cheek in your posts and you make a valid point that your shafts are sold then processed by the CM. Vern brought some of you shaft into my shop and he processed them here. They were very straight without bumping.

All is good,

Rick
 
I think someone forgot he hypes ( a must have ? ) and sells a six-winger.
And Robert Falk did not play Router. He played Spindle Motor.

Rick , if you were getting great results with your flat ground, why did you go
to TCG?
And if TCG is working great, why get it ground?



I don't cone anymore ( heaven forgive Murray Tucker and Alex Brick for coning down to .600 ) because my dowels have no problems with .980-.650 first taper . That is some .700" in the middle.
Your results might vary. Like the poor local guy to me, had to discard half of his shafts squares before he even started turning them round.
I think he got them from a real nice former cue factory owner .
 
Last edited:
We've never "coned" any of our shafts on the first taper.

We do however, start with a heavy large taper pass. The depth of cut diminishes with each cut until the final pass is a very small cut.

I think it's really the same thing, but I'm too lazy to mess with figuring out all the tapers. I built a spreadsheet to just plug in the final dimensions at the various lengths and it gives me all my taper passes. I just copy and paste to notepad and save.


Royce
 
No pissing Joe and I always respect your experience and candor. I did ask you your opinion concerning wood shock.

I know there is always some tongue and cheek in your posts and you make a valid point that your shafts are sold then processed by the CM. Vern brought some of you shaft into my shop and he processed them here. They were very straight without bumping.

All is good,

Rick


Life is too short to take things so seriously. We all have our opinions. I think you have overkill in your set-up but if it makes you happy, then great. I don't think it's necessary and most others produce fine quality shafts with their set-ups either simple or engineered to put a man on the moon. I just don't think we need to over engineer simple things. I know I have better things to do but to each their own. Like I said, I think your set-up is ingenious with that Teflon thing for chatter. That's exactly what is needed when you encounter chatter.

I meant to reply to that query and forgot not to mention got sidetracked.

Re: Shaft wood shock

I wrote way back when I had my other web site prior to converting to CueCom in 2003, an article about stress relieving maple wood. No one knew what it was nor did anyone every hear about it and the effects it has on wood. That was around 2000. Today everyone is an expert with regard to stress relieving maple. Imagine that. :thumbup: It's a very important part of drying wood. Lumber, pretty much is not stress relieved. Many purchase lumber and that's not the way to go. Let's not get into it as that is another whole can of worms.

If your wood is stress relieved and dried properly, there is less wood shock and any shock will be minimal. We have to remember, some wood just doesn't want to be a shaft or pool cue and there is nothing you nor I can do to help that fact.

The maple we receive and have been receiving for many, many years comes from the same two suppliers. They know how to dry wood. We no longer buy planks as it's just as effective to buy squares today. 15, 20 and 30 years ago it was a different story; not so today. There is some really good wood out there if you know where it is. Technology with drying wood has advanced to the point of creating perfect wood for our industry if such a thing exists. Going into the forest in December with a compass, longitudinal device and a hatchet are no longer necessary and in fact quite ridiculous. Time is better spent in other more productive areas and let the wood drying experts do their job so that we can do ours.

When we get a new shipment, we like to let it sit for at least 6 months in our shop. We're processing last years shipment, this year. We have shafts hanging for years prior to sale because of the depth of our inventory. That helps in getting and making a quality shaft and we recommend that everyone stocks their shop with wood so they have shafts in the pipeline.

As far as shock:
I think the best and biggest shock is running a 1" square through a doweling machine. I think it does wonders for the wood. It's not different than turning a square on your lathe or CNC. Some think it's more violent but I don't think so. We all have to get to a 1" dowel and turning round is turning round regardless how we get there. You can whittle it down for all I care. This is the initial shock of the wood and separates the good ones from the bad ones.

We recently dowelled over 2,000 shafts and lost less than 50 (I think it was 36). I'll repeat that. We ran over 2,000 shafts through our doweling machine and lost less than 50 to warping. That's because the wood is dried properly or stress relieved.

Once the wood is doweled, we let it sit for a few weeks and then begin the coning process. This is where we cull out the bad shafts from the doweling which amounted to less than 50 or so we quoted above. From the coning process forward we do not have any loss of shafts. I know that may sound unbelievable but that's the truth. The wood is very stable at this point. I should further point out that we seal the cones at .750. We believe this helps too.

I would like to add that going from 1" rounds to a .750 cone is acceptable for a first cut if you know what you're doing and if you've done it and tested it before doing all your shafts. Wood reacts differently in different areas, climates and humidity so proceed with caution. Just because ignorant people in the desert can go from round to a taper of say, 640/975 doesn't make it right for you so this information is misleading and quite ignorant. I cannot stress it enough to be careful of ignorant AZ know-it-alls who say that a 640/975 taper is the way to do it for a first cut. If you do, you'll have warped shafts guaranteed. For the average cue maker and especially newbie starting out, it is entirely too much meat to cut after being a 1" round.

If you have a shop that is controlled, good quality wood, sharp cutters traveling at high speeds then you'll help reduce "shock" and maintain happiness within the wood. Playing a little music also helps.

We were the first to introduce 6 wing cutters when everyone was using the standard cutters. We sell two types and both have their uses as described. We believe these will serve you best when cutting shafts or anything for that matter. Of course, we still use a straight cutter on our CNC for coning and it works well for us. We do use the 6 flute for tapering and final passes which takes approximately 15 or so minutes. You final pass should be slow.

As I stated earlier, no need for high precision when coning. When you start tapering, then start paying attention.
 
We've never "coned" any of our shafts on the first taper.

We do however, start with a heavy large taper pass. The depth of cut diminishes with each cut until the final pass is a very small cut.

I think it's really the same thing, but I'm too lazy to mess with figuring out all the tapers. I built a spreadsheet to just plug in the final dimensions at the various lengths and it gives me all my taper passes. I just copy and paste to notepad and save.


Royce

Royce,

I understand what you are saying but to put it out there is not in the best interest of everyone reading this. There are a lot of less experienced guys reading and then thinking that they can go from a 1" dowel right down to a 600 taper and the wood will be just fine. Royce said so! They'll have warped shafts from that formula. I know it works for you but it won't necessarily work for everyone reading this and that's why we sell and recommend that everyone cone their shafts first so that it helps them get to the final taper without losing shafts.

Not everyone can go from a 1" dowel right down to a deep cut taper.
 
We've never "coned" any of our shafts on the first taper.

We do however, start with a heavy large taper pass. The depth of cut diminishes with each cut until the final pass is a very small cut.

I think it's really the same thing, but I'm too lazy to mess with figuring out all the tapers. I built a spreadsheet to just plug in the final dimensions at the various lengths and it gives me all my taper passes. I just copy and paste to notepad and save.


Royce

Same here.
3 heavy passes and then one light pass get me to .650.

If I had to throw away a lot after tapering to .650 end, I'd find a new supplier.
Not from flip-flopping habitual snake oil salesman truth stretcher though.


Before you start thinking of hogging out to .650 with a straight bit and laminate trimmer, stop .
I can only imagine the push-off and stress with that straight bit . Your laminate trimmer would probably cry too.
I use a 2 1/4 HP Dewalt for hogging. Your laminate router will need more passes.
http://www.magnate.net/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=PG253
Get yourself a Magnate 4-winger. 1/8th kerf is plenty. Check the rpm recommendation.
They are lighter than Freud slotters and have reinforced centers. They're the best non-custom made I've seen.
Why would anyone suggest a straight bit for hogging shafts, I have no idea. Then again, why would anyone suggest sealing with super glue after every cut ?
I think this fat coning thingy became popular b/c those straight bits banana'd shafts when tapering heavily back in the days.
Now we have people like Tucker and Brick going to .600 cones instead of .750. If they are getting bad results, they'd stop doing it.
Or heaven forbid, straight to fat taper like RBC.
I did fat coning too starting when I apprenticed with my mentor back in 2001. Then I dared get to .650 tapers after really looking at the pieces that moved at varying stages. I can go on and on why coning to .750 is a waste of time and is just a security blanket. I'll take PM questions on that matter instead as I have sniping stalker.
Your results might vary. I have no idea what kind of pieces you get . I sure hope you're not getting left-overs from an infamous supplier.
 
Last edited:
Same here.
3 heavy passes and then one light pass get me to .650.

If I had to throw away a lot after tapering to .650 end, I'd find a new supplier.
Not from flip-flopping habitual snake oil salesman truth stretcher though.


Before you start thinking of hogging out to .650 with a straight bit and laminate trimmer, stop .
I can only imagine the push-off and stress with that straight bit . Your laminate trimmer would probably cry too.
I use a 2 1/4 HP Dewalt for hogging. Your laminate router will need more passes.
http://www.magnate.net/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=PG253
Get yourself a Magnate 4-winger. 1/8th kerf is plenty. Check the rpm recommendation.
They are lighter than Freud slotters and have reinforced centers. They're the best non-custom made I've seen.
Why would anyone suggest a straight bit for hogging shafts, I have no idea. Then again, why would anyone suggest sealing with super glue after every cut ?
I think this fat coning thingy became popular b/c those straight bits banana'd shafts when tapering heavily back in the days.
Now we have people like Tucker and Brick going to .600 cones instead of .750. If they are getting bad results, they'd stop doing it.
Or heaven forbid, straight to fat taper like RBC.
I did fat coning too starting when I apprenticed with my mentor back in 2001. Then I dared get to .650 tapers after really looking at the pieces that moved at varying stages. I can go on and on why coning to .750 is a waste of time and is just a security blanket. I'll take PM questions on that matter instead as I have sniping stalker.
Your results might vary. I have no idea what kind of pieces you get . I sure hope you're not getting left-overs from an infamous supplier.

Never coned a shaft that was not going to be a straight cone taper when finished... ever. No reason to .
 
We've never "coned" any of our shafts on the first taper.

We do however, start with a heavy large taper pass. The depth of cut diminishes with each cut until the final pass is a very small cut.

I think it's really the same thing, but I'm too lazy to mess with figuring out all the tapers. I built a spreadsheet to just plug in the final dimensions at the various lengths and it gives me all my taper passes. I just copy and paste to notepad and save.


Royce

That's pretty much the route I take. From dowel, the first cut is a very deep taper cut, and every successive cut is thinner until final size, which is around a .010" cut.

As for stress relieving, that's a method any knowledgeable kiln operator does on all lumber. It's not specific to cue shafts. Pretty much any lumber bought from a major forest product manufacturer will be stress relieved. The technology is as old as kiln drying itself, and really deserves no special mention because it's nothing more than one of many cycles in a drying schedule.
 
Royce,

I understand what you are saying but to put it out there is not in the best interest of everyone reading this. There are a lot of less experienced guys reading and then thinking that they can go from a 1" dowel right down to a 600 taper and the wood will be just fine. Royce said so! They'll have warped shafts from that formula. I know it works for you but it won't necessarily work for everyone reading this and that's why we sell and recommend that everyone cone their shafts first so that it helps them get to the final taper without losing shafts.

Not everyone can go from a 1" dowel right down to a deep cut taper.

Joe,

I'm not sure I was communicating the same thing you think I was communicating.

All I said was that we do a heavy initial taper pass, and then the passes decrease in cut depth until the final pass which is a small cut.

I don't recall listing any specific numbers. That was for a reason!

Royce
 
Joe,

I'm not sure I was communicating the same thing you think I was communicating.

All I said was that we do a heavy initial taper pass, and then the passes decrease in cut depth until the final pass which is a small cut.

I don't recall listing any specific numbers. That was for a reason!

Royce


Royce,

I understand that and I see you didn't mean anything by what you said. I'm sorry if you took what I said incorrectly. You have to understand that there are pinheads everywhere and as surprising as it may be they sometimes seem to abound on here with misinformation or misleading information. The conversation is going that after you dowel the shaft, it's perfectly acceptable and the norm to go directly to a .600/.900 taper or thereabouts. I don't think that's good advice for some who are reading this because those of us who do that aggressive tapering already know the outcome in our shops. A newbie will just ruin wood because perhaps they haven't tested the outcome thoroughly in their shops which may vary significantly from your shop and our shop. People reading this will believe it's perfectly normal to go from 1" round to a .600 taper and not experience any issues is just not the case for everyone.

Those of us who are experienced with wood and building cues and cutting shafts is perfectly ok. I'm just trying to let some who are reading this know that going directly to an aggressive taper may not be for them for various reasons. That's why it's perhaps better to go slower with less aggressive passes.

We believe going to a .750 cone and then to a taper is more prudent for those who are not yet experienced with aggressive passes which can ruin the shaft. We sell .750 cones for that reason as they are stable and ready for a taper pass. The shafts hold up well and the customer benefits from our labor up to that part. It's just a more conservative approach which guarantees a better yield for this program.


As for stress relieving, that's a method any knowledgeable kiln operator does on all lumber. It's not specific to cue shafts. Pretty much any lumber bought from a major forest product manufacturer will be stress relieved. The technology is as old as kiln drying itself, and really deserves no special mention because it's nothing more than one of many cycles in a drying schedule.



I'm surprised that a man of your caliber and intellect would make such a blanket statement. Perhaps, you weren't thinking clearly. To openly state with regard to 'stress relieving', "that's a method any knowledgeable kiln operator does on all lumber. It's not specific to cue shafts" is not very responsible or you truly just don't know. If that statement were true then there would be no warped wood/lumber/shaftwood in the marketplace and we all know that is not the case. Therefore, "Pretty much any lumber bought from a major forest product manufacturer will be stress relieved" is not the case. Improperly dried wood is out there for everyone including shaft wood and wood sold as shaft wood. In fact, there is more improperly dried wood than properly 'stress relieved' wood on the market.

Furthermore, the technology of vacuum kilns is quite new. Ten years ago less than 20% of all kilns in the USA were vacuum kilns. It was difficult finding vacuum dried wood. And, much of the conventional kiln dried wood is not properly dried or 'stress relieved' even to this day. I'm certain you know that.

You can order maple wood from any number of suppliers and wood sold as shafts from the usual sources. Much of that wood does not take kindly to becoming shafts.

-----------
An observation about the peanut gallery....
I noticed and find it incredible that anyone can have 17,000 unintelligible posts in 10 years or 5 posts per days each and everyday. Simply amazing. A genuine posting champion to say the least. Can you imagine posting 5 times a day every single day of your life for 10 years straight. I say we take up a collection and buy this guy a life. :D
 
Here's a few quick reads that sum up EXACTLY what I have posted. It's science. Argue with me and attempt to discredit or disqualify me all you like, but science is science. If you're too lazy to do a search or prefer to be ignorant, then allow me to provide a few starters. Plenty more with a google search. Any respectable university with an agriculture program has studied this stuff to extremes, and for the most part it's posted online for anybody to access. Many are credited by the USDA.

https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/...d=E5FFB384595660987136C5E975456ABE?sequence=1

http://www.nyle.com/downloads/KilnDrying.pdf This one shouldn't count as it's a timber business competitor, but the info is spot on and IMO very easy to understand

http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-3166/FAPC-146web.pdf
 
Last edited:
Here's a few quick reads that sum up EXACTLY what I have posted. It's science. Argue with me and attempt to discredit or disqualify me all you like, but science is science. If you're too lazy to do a search or prefer to be ignorant, then allow me to provide a few starters. Plenty more with a google search. Any respectable university with an agriculture program has studied this stuff to extremes, and for the most part it's posted online for anybody to access. Many are credited by the USDA.

https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/...d=E5FFB384595660987136C5E975456ABE?sequence=1

http://www.nyle.com/downloads/KilnDrying.pdf This one shouldn't count as it's a timber business competitor, but the info is spot on and IMO very easy to understand

http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-3166/FAPC-146web.pdf


You are absolutely correct as arguing IS most certainly ridiculous and you cannot argue with pompous people but I’ll try to educate you with the reality of what you stated. You made certain incorrect claims and generalizations, then reply with kiln drying schedules which have absolutely no bearing on your original claims nor my replies to your inaccuracies.

For your edification:

You Stated regarding ‘stress relieving’:
that's a method any knowledgeable kiln operator does on all lumber. It's not specific to cue shafts

I Stated:
It is not very responsible or you truly just don't know. If that statement were true then there would be no warped wood/lumber/shaftwood in the marketplace and we all know that is not the case. Therefore…

You Then Stated:
Pretty much any lumber bought from a major forest product manufacturer will be stress relieved

I Stated:
That is not the case. Improperly dried wood is out there for everyone including shaft wood and wood sold as shaft wood. In fact, there is more improperly dried wood than properly 'stress relieved' wood on the market.

And now, rather than to say you made a mistake making general statements, you cite kiln drying schedules which no one is going to argue over because we’re not disputing kiln drying methods or schedules. You can site all the intellectual and scientific information you can find as there are thousands of them. All that flies in the face of reality that not everyone stress relieves wood much less knows what they are doing when drying wood. If they did, then there would be no warped wood on the marketplace and as we all know that is not the case therefore not every kiln operator follows schedules and the links you cite.

What does the USDA have to do with any of this; nothing but I hope it made you feel good citing it. To make generalizations as you did and believe that ALL kiln operators follow the correct and precise schedule is naive at best.

Additionally, in this business no one ever heard of ‘stress relieving’ wood when we posted what we did on our web site in 2000 and again in 2003.

You made an error with your generalization; own up to it and let’s move on.

And lastly, you stated:
As for stress relieving... the technology is as old as kiln drying itself, and really deserves no special mention because it's nothing more than one of many cycles in a drying schedule.

When drying wood - If the last blast is not performed in the drying cycle, then it's not done correctly and therefore not properly stress relieved. This requires an additional 16 hours of kiln use which further ties up the kiln and the funds of the company prior to making the kiln available to the next session. Time is money and many kiln operators don't do it despite your scientific links.

Purchasing properly dried and properly 'stress relieved' wood from reliable sources is paramount in this business and you relegate it to "deserves no special mention". That statement shows your naivety.
 
That's pretty much the route I take. From dowel, the first cut is a very deep taper cut, and every successive cut is thinner until final size, which is around a .010" cut.

As for stress relieving, that's a method any knowledgeable kiln operator does on all lumber. It's not specific to cue shafts. Pretty much any lumber bought from a major forest product manufacturer will be stress relieved. The technology is as old as kiln drying itself, and really deserves no special mention because it's nothing more than one of many cycles in a drying schedule.

Just buy cones from Egg Head. :grin:
Ran thru crunchenmunchen and $1 bit.


The flipflopper reminds me of Senator Kerry and Jane Fonda.
It went from those who do that are neophytes to perfectly ok for us. Which is funny b/c he became a member of that "us" suddenly. Then it went to "perhaps" blah blah blah.
Kinda like when Jane Fonda pulled out her gun when someone was about to break in her house. She's a card carrying anti-gun ownership communist. Yeah, it's ok for her to have a gun, but not ok for others.
I'll take .980-.650 first taper ( it's not .600 at the tip and it's still some .700 in the middle ) from the dowels I let sit a long time and properly centered and cut with the right cutters over a .750 cone ran through a muncher first then cut with real cheap bit. Kinda funny he talks to most cue makers out there but somehow two world class makers in his neck of the woods don't bother fat coning to .750 either.
Throw in the names who already posted here who said they don't bother either.
 
Last edited:
You are absolutely correct as arguing IS most certainly ridiculous and you cannot argue with pompous people but I’ll try to educate you with the reality of what you stated. You made certain incorrect claims and generalizations, then reply with kiln drying schedules which have absolutely no bearing on your original claims nor my replies to your inaccuracies.

For your edification:

You Stated regarding ‘stress relieving’:
that's a method any knowledgeable kiln operator does on all lumber. It's not specific to cue shafts

I Stated:
It is not very responsible or you truly just don't know. If that statement were true then there would be no warped wood/lumber/shaftwood in the marketplace and we all know that is not the case. Therefore…

You Then Stated:
Pretty much any lumber bought from a major forest product manufacturer will be stress relieved

I Stated:
That is not the case. Improperly dried wood is out there for everyone including shaft wood and wood sold as shaft wood. In fact, there is more improperly dried wood than properly 'stress relieved' wood on the market.

And now, rather than to say you made a mistake making general statements, you cite kiln drying schedules which no one is going to argue over because we’re not disputing kiln drying methods or schedules. You can site all the intellectual and scientific information you can find as there are thousands of them. All that flies in the face of reality that not everyone stress relieves wood much less knows what they are doing when drying wood. If they did, then there would be no warped wood on the marketplace and as we all know that is not the case therefore not every kiln operator follows schedules and the links you cite.

What does the USDA have to do with any of this; nothing but I hope it made you feel good citing it. To make generalizations as you did and believe that ALL kiln operators follow the correct and precise schedule is naive at best.

Additionally, in this business no one ever heard of ‘stress relieving’ wood when we posted what we did on our web site in 2000 and again in 2003.

You made an error with your generalization; own up to it and let’s move on.

And lastly, you stated:
As for stress relieving... the technology is as old as kiln drying itself, and really deserves no special mention because it's nothing more than one of many cycles in a drying schedule.

When drying wood - If the last blast is not performed in the drying cycle, then it's not done correctly and therefore not properly stress relieved. This requires an additional 16 hours of kiln use which further ties up the kiln and the funds of the company prior to making the kiln available to the next session. Time is money and many kiln operators don't do it despite your scientific links.

Purchasing properly dried and properly 'stress relieved' wood from reliable sources is paramount in this business and you relegate it to "deserves no special mention". That statement shows your naivety.

I have known about this, and bought wood from those that also knew about this, since at least the mid 90's.

And you might want to review this -http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=167988
 
Joe, did you bother reading anything in the links I posted? They all pretty much state exactly what I have. You are going to educate me? Really? Funny.

Wood moves regardless of how it was dried. Stress relieving relieves ONLY the case hardening that occurs during the drying process, and does absolutely nothing for the natural stress or for any climatic induced stresses that occur after drying. So yes, there are lots of stress relieved wood that warps. It's a precaution, nothing more, and is certainly not a silver bullet that prevents wood from warping.

As for the USDA, the authority and funding behind the majority of legitimate studies, they have more clout than any industry competitor. For one thing, they have a completely different agenda. Their purpose is to provide unsolicited, factual information to the industry competitors so that they can produce the highest quality product possible. Government wants our timber industry to do well, because it's a huge generator of revenue for our nation. That's why they fund the studies or conduct them themselves, and make the findings public. They not only provide the science, but they are also the governing body that overseas legitimate timber industry commerce, not only in the USA but several other nations as well. "What does the USDA have to do with it?" Kinda everything.

Paint me any color you wish, doesn't change the facts. You keep quoting my statements as if there is some fault to them, but they are exactly correct. Not only do I stand by them, but I posted factual evidence to support them. How about you now post up some documented evidence to support your position? Whatcha got?
 
Joe, did you bother reading anything in the links I posted? They all pretty much state exactly what I have. You are going to educate me? Really? Funny.

Wood moves regardless of how it was dried. Stress relieving relieves ONLY the case hardening that occurs during the drying process, and does absolutely nothing for the natural stress or for any climatic induced stresses that occur after drying. So yes, there are lots of stress relieved wood that warps. It's a precaution, nothing more, and is certainly not a silver bullet that prevents wood from warping.

As for the USDA, the authority and funding behind the majority of legitimate studies, they have more clout than any industry competitor. For one thing, they have a completely different agenda. Their purpose is to provide unsolicited, factual information to the industry competitors so that they can produce the highest quality product possible. Government wants our timber industry to do well, because it's a huge generator of revenue for our nation. That's why they fund the studies or conduct them themselves, and make the findings public. They not only provide the science, but they are also the governing body that overseas legitimate timber industry commerce, not only in the USA but several other nations as well. "What does the USDA have to do with it?" Kinda everything.

Paint me any color you wish, doesn't change the facts. You keep quoting my statements as if there is some fault to them, but they are exactly correct. Not only do I stand by them, but I posted factual evidence to support them. How about you now post up some documented evidence to support your position? Whatcha got?


You should run for public office as you're great at not answering the question. You made a mistake and painted a broad picture that was inaccurate. You still sidestep the issues and inaccuracies and quote scientific evidence that has no bearing on the inaccuracies you initially stated. I'll repeat them here for you because you obviously cannot understand plain and simple English.

No one cares about your studies or who is funding anything. This has to do with inaccurate generalizations you made, common sense which as they say, is uncommon and I am realizing that the more we continue this exercise in futility.

Properly dried stress relieved wood will not warp to the degree that other woods do. That's the simple truth and not all kiln operators know what they're doing. You're saying just because it's in writing, it must be true and everyone must be following it and is doing it properly. That's naïve and ridiculous.

You Stated regarding ‘stress relieving’:
that's a method any knowledgeable kiln operator does on all lumber. It's not specific to cue shafts

I Stated:
It is not very responsible or you truly just don't know. If that statement were true then there would be no warped wood/lumber/shaftwood in the marketplace and we all know that is not the case. Therefore…

You Then Stated:
Pretty much any lumber bought from a major forest product manufacturer will be stress relieved

I Stated:
That is not the case. Improperly dried wood is out there for everyone including shaft wood and wood sold as shaft wood. In fact, there is more improperly dried wood than properly 'stress relieved' wood on the market.

And now, rather than to say you made a mistake making general statements, you cite kiln drying schedules which no one is going to argue over because we’re not disputing kiln drying methods or schedules. You can site all the intellectual and scientific information you can find as there are thousands of them. All that flies in the face of reality that not everyone stress relieves wood much less knows what they are doing when drying wood. If they did, then there would be no warped wood on the marketplace and as we all know that is not the case therefore not every kiln operator follows schedules and the links you cite.

What does the USDA have to do with any of this; nothing but I hope it made you feel good citing it. To make generalizations as you did and believe that ALL kiln operators follow the correct and precise schedule is naive at best.

Additionally, in this business no one ever heard of ‘stress relieving’ wood when we posted what we did on our web site in 2000 and again in 2003.

You made an error with your generalization; own up to it and let’s move on.

And lastly, you stated:
As for stress relieving... the technology is as old as kiln drying itself, and really deserves no special mention because it's nothing more than one of many cycles in a drying schedule.

When drying wood - If the last blast is not performed in the drying cycle, then it's not done correctly and therefore not properly stress relieved. This requires an additional 16 hours of kiln use which further ties up the kiln and the funds of the company prior to making the kiln available to the next session. Time is money and many kiln operators don't do it despite your scientific links.

Purchasing properly dried and properly 'stress relieved' wood from reliable sources is paramount in this business and you relegate it to "deserves no special mention". That statement shows your naivety.


I have known about this, and bought wood from those that also knew about this, since at least the mid 90's.
And you might want to review this -http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=167988

No one with half a brain is going to buy what you are selling and I for sure am not so on that note, it’s time to exit the gallery and you all know what gallery that is.

Have a very nice day to all of you and enjoy playing with each other.
 
You should run for public office as you're great at not answering the question. You made a mistake and painted a broad picture that was inaccurate. You still sidestep the issues and inaccuracies and quote scientific evidence that has no bearing on the inaccuracies you initially stated. I'll repeat them here for you because you obviously cannot understand plain and simple English.

No one cares about your studies or who is funding anything. This has to do with inaccurate generalizations you made, common sense which as they say, is uncommon and I am realizing that the more we continue this exercise in futility.

Properly dried stress relieved wood will not warp to the degree that other woods do. That's the simple truth and not all kiln operators know what they're doing. You're saying just because it's in writing, it must be true and everyone must be following it and is doing it properly. That's naïve and ridiculous.

You Stated regarding ‘stress relieving’:
that's a method any knowledgeable kiln operator does on all lumber. It's not specific to cue shafts

I Stated:
It is not very responsible or you truly just don't know. If that statement were true then there would be no warped wood/lumber/shaftwood in the marketplace and we all know that is not the case. Therefore…

You Then Stated:
Pretty much any lumber bought from a major forest product manufacturer will be stress relieved

I Stated:
That is not the case. Improperly dried wood is out there for everyone including shaft wood and wood sold as shaft wood. In fact, there is more improperly dried wood than properly 'stress relieved' wood on the market.

And now, rather than to say you made a mistake making general statements, you cite kiln drying schedules which no one is going to argue over because we’re not disputing kiln drying methods or schedules. You can site all the intellectual and scientific information you can find as there are thousands of them. All that flies in the face of reality that not everyone stress relieves wood much less knows what they are doing when drying wood. If they did, then there would be no warped wood on the marketplace and as we all know that is not the case therefore not every kiln operator follows schedules and the links you cite.

What does the USDA have to do with any of this; nothing but I hope it made you feel good citing it. To make generalizations as you did and believe that ALL kiln operators follow the correct and precise schedule is naive at best.

Additionally, in this business no one ever heard of ‘stress relieving’ wood when we posted what we did on our web site in 2000 and again in 2003.

You made an error with your generalization; own up to it and let’s move on.

And lastly, you stated:
As for stress relieving... the technology is as old as kiln drying itself, and really deserves no special mention because it's nothing more than one of many cycles in a drying schedule.

When drying wood - If the last blast is not performed in the drying cycle, then it's not done correctly and therefore not properly stress relieved. This requires an additional 16 hours of kiln use which further ties up the kiln and the funds of the company prior to making the kiln available to the next session. Time is money and many kiln operators don't do it despite your scientific links.

Purchasing properly dried and properly 'stress relieved' wood from reliable sources is paramount in this business and you relegate it to "deserves no special mention". That statement shows your naivety.




No one with half a brain is going to buy what you are selling and I for sure am not so on that note, it’s time to exit the gallery and you all know what gallery that is.

Have a very nice day to all of you and enjoy playing with each other.

lol, nice generalization there.

As for stress relieved wood --- The annual BCA event was in Orlando, FL in 1998, I was there with laminated shaft blanks from wood that had been stress relieved. Prior to that I had been in MI where I talked with 2 private wood cutters, both of whom I believe are still in business, they were well aware of stress relieving to minimize case hardening. Talked to one for an extended period about drying wood and sound propagation. Subsequently we sent shaft squares to the Forest Products Lab.... run by the USDA.... for testing. Before buying wood from these gentlemen I purchased wood from a supplier in Canada, who is no longer in business, who also knew full well about stress relieving wood. As has been pointed out MOST KNOWLEDGEABLE wood merchants know all about this... and have for years. That you were the first is pure poppycock. I suppose you invented quartersawing also?
 
I'm not even going to bother reading that novel of jibberish. You're wrong, Joe. Simple as that. I asked for you to post up some legitimate evidence from a known source that would contradict my posts, but you couldn't do it. Rather you go into a rant that I haven't read nor will I. I posted 3 links that clearly support my posts, and trust me there are many, many more I can pool from that all break it down exactly the same way. Point being, if you're going to debate a scientific topic, at least understand the subject matter and have sources to support your stance. It's not an opinion based topic.
 
Don't know much about this subject on a technical level, but I have bought dowels from Other suppliers and bought the same amount from Joe over the last 5-6 years, and they all seem to have the same ratio of WARPED dowels right out of the box, without any processing time from me. A year or 5 later, they are still warped the same still untouched by any of my machines. If his wood is so relieved, then there should have been less, MUCH less in his batch compared to the others. What I consider warped is anywhere from .250" -.400" wobble anywhere along the 30" dowel.
I have to agree with Eric, that the kiln drying doesn't take care of any growth stress contained in the wood, only the casehardening stress created from the kiln process itself, .......IMO
Dave
 
Back
Top