Grady was a one pocket specialist, and always tried or had you frozen to another ball. During Gradys earlier days here in town (1973) when he opened a pool room, if the cue ball and the object ball were frozen together he logically came up with a reason that you were NOT allowed to shoot forward, because since both balls went the same speed it had to be illegal. I found out just a few years ago (I quit playing for a long time) it was a legal shot if you didn't dbl hit the cue ball. He made this rule and Many followed his thinking for years on this aspect of play. Nowadays that has been proven wrong when a ball is frozen to the cue ball, but still anyone can make a bad hit on Any shot at anytime.
Here is a rule of thumb that many beginners can conceptualize. If your shooting straight into and object ball and the cue ball is two inches away, you better have a nip type bridge and a swing ''less than two inches'' to NOT dbl hit the object ball. It's physics plain and simple. How could one follow thru four or three inches, shooting straight into and object ball only two inches away and not push it???? Try it, let us all know how it goes.
Why am I having such a hard time getting my thought across. I know what a foul is by the current rule. You are asking me to try something that I understand.
What you don't seem to understand is I'm suggesting something different. OK, let me put it this way make double hits legal so long as the cb displays some independent character.
Character was Grady's word, I wish I could articulate this with a different word since it seems its not descriptive enough for some.
Once again I'd like to hear reasoning on what I think is another illegal hit that no one calls. That is inadvertently scooping under the cb while shooting a shot causing the cb to jump off the table surface and then making t h e shot.
This is not uncommon, it happened just recently on the tv table at the us open, and the player continued shooting. Why isnt this an illegal jump? Suppose a third ball was near enough to the shot where it would be questionable the ob could be seen? Then is it a foul? When is it a foul?
If you can't scoop under a the cb to jump why isn't this called? Not to mention, as I pointed out before, while doing this the cb had to have been hit with the ferrule, so...... what gives with that shot?