the thread is about ronnie and scott
so carry on with the threads dicussion
You're absolutely correct, BBB!
BACK ON TOPIC!
I have nothing else to add about RA or Scott!
the thread is about ronnie and scott
so carry on with the threads dicussion
I meant at Johnston City, genius! YOU were NOT there the last 4 years, especially when the 'Feds' showed up!
That YOU can empty out on!
Why don't you, just for once..say what YOU mean, 'GENIUS' ?...Would you also like to wager I was NOT at Johnston City..'one' of the last 4 yrs. it was there ? :sorry:
SJD---This is just TOO easy !..I'm starting to feel guilty again ! :embarrassed2:
PS..Dang it Larry, you just gave him an excuse to escape...I may have to 'flame' you !![]()
as an aside and not wantig to hijack the thread
dick and mr3cushion
HERE IS A QUESTION
a yes or no is THE only answer
do not substitute another name
is efren the greatest 1p player ever in his prime beating everyone else in their prime???
id say yes
as an aside and not wantig to hijack the thread
dick and mr3cushion
HERE IS A QUESTION
a yes or no is THE only answer
do not substitute another name
is efren the greatest 1p player ever in his prime beating everyone else in their prime???
id say yes
I think Efren has a slight hole in his 1 pocket game. I say slight because when you are talking about the best of the best it really is splitting hairs, but what else do we have to do?
This slight hole that I'm speaking of is his tendency to be too creative. I think he shoots a few too many low probability shots. I think this stems from him learning the game much later in his career than many of the other great 1 pocket players. This, combined with him growing up playing rotation pool, where you have to -- by necessity come with some crazy shots, has created a player that shoots a few too many flyers.
If there's any weakness in his game -- this is it and I have a feeling that some of the past great 1 pocket players could have used this to their advantage. These guys that managed to grind out rack after rack after rack probably had a slightly better gauge on the actual shot percentages than does Efren.
So while I suspect Efren had (and has) more tools in his tool bag than Ronnie Allen did, Ronnie may have been able to keep it close by instinctively understanding the odds just a bit better. Of course I've never seen RA play so I'm just stipulating here -- for fun.
... he won at least two of his titles, by the "Efren factor"![]()
This is exactly what I'm referring to. His ability to "execute almost anything" is both a blessing and a curse. Maybe this is why he has a bit of trouble with the end game -- as you put it. He thinks he can execute anything so he loses track of the odds.Very good 'stipulating' BD !.. However, I don't think Efren concerned himself with 'odds'...He was good enough to execute almost anything he tried..
His ONLY weakness, to this day, remains his 'end game' ! Also, he won at least two of his titles, by the "Efren factor" ! (no jealousy whatsoever, involved here)
By that I mean, normally 'top quality' one pocket player's, went 'brain dead' when playing him !..For instance, when Corey D. needed 1 ball, and Effie needed 4 (for the title) Corey shot 5-6 dead-wrong shots in a row, to lose that game !...I submit, that the average 'B' one pocket player could have 'cinched' that particular game, (99 times out of a 100) even if he were playing God !
SJD--
PS..Given the layout, even "I" could have won that game, (and several that Daulton gave away too)...But I definitely do give Efren credit, for earning the "Efren Factor" !..Hope that makes sense !![]()
This is exactly what I'm referring to. His ability to "execute almost anything" is both a blessing and a curse. Maybe this is why he has a bit of trouble with the end game -- as you put it. He thinks he can execute anything so he loses track of the odds.
I understand what you're saying about the Efren factor too. I see the same principle play out all the time on a much smaller scale. In league play I see guys crumble against a certain local player that they view as the top dog. They miss the easiest shots against him and often times shoot the wrong ball as well.
Thanks for the insight. I'll have to pay closer attention to his end game. Maybe I'll look up that Corey/Efren match.
Me like Jay have seen Ronnie play quite alot. I watched him in 1970 play perfect many times, plus he was tough to fade! In my opinion he was the best one pocket player of all times for the cash. I think that Artie moved better in the game than anybody ever has or will. Artie also matched up better than anyone also. If Artie played I wanted a piece of his action for sure, he's triple smart.
Me like Jay have seen Ronnie play quite alot. I watched him in 1970 play perfect many times, plus he was tough to fade! In my opinion he was the best one pocket player of all times for the cash. I think that Artie moved better in the game than anybody ever has or will. Artie also matched up better than anyone also. If Artie played I wanted a piece of his action for sure, he's triple smart.
Did I misread something ???...I believe Cotton agreed with Jay, when he said, "Ronnie was the best player of all time, for the cash !"..and he should surely know !...Then, as an 'add on', he said.."Artie was the smartest !"
Where is the argument? AB needed weight from RA, to get a chance to prove howsmart he was, didn't he
Amazing, how SOME people will grasp at any straw, to try and make themselves 'right' !... Too bad Bobby only drops by about once a year ! :sorry: