SBB added $4K between the prize fund and last woman standing. Is the TD associated with the SBB?
Looks like he clearly mentioned he was taking 10%. Oh, did he mention it before hand? Nope, but i'm sure he didn't mention a lot of things before hand.
Bottom line, would this info up front had stopped even 1 person from entering the tourney? Nope.
The only folks "losing" that 10% are the ones that won the calcutta. I'll take that action, If I win, you get a nice little tip. Seems more than reasonable to me.
They take between 18 and 25% of every bet made at the racetrack. State numbers games take 50%-10% is a great deal for a Calcuttae,
They take between 18 and 25% of every bet made at the racetrack. State numbers games take 50%-10% is a great deal for a Calcuttae,
In India, calcuttas are illegal.
:scratchhead:
The TD should take 50% of the prize fund and 50% of the calcutta for having to deal with us pool players![]()
5% is a pretty common practice. This was a pretty small Calcutta in the scheme of things actually, but it was also a shorter/smaller event than what I'm used to with the Big Tyme Classic. 1st for the Calcutta last year was a hair over 20k (Alex Pagulayan).
So the key question is if calcultta is common practice in this event and 5% is common, then the TD in thsi event getting 10% is getting extra 5% above market norm
In business world, they call that "profiteering"
But heck who cares about the pool world- another 5% is peanuts $1K+
:grin:
It wasn't $3k, it was $4295 as there were two auctions.
Lynch the TD.
End of problem.
10% is NORMAL
randyg
and $3200 in green fees
Wonder if the TD is the owner ? WPA charges a sanctioning fee , wonder what you get for that ? I understand pool rooms are in business to make money and I'm sure the entire place was used to host the tournament . I doubt Skinny Bob's is a 501-3c. It was played on 9 footers , wonder if that counts for anything ?
/