Most people who gamble play by the game
then you can quit when you get so far ahead or behind
the problem has always been,certain people quit when they get just a game or so loser
to prevent this from happening it was usueful to play X games ahead or frezze out
as we called it
To quit ahead took on a nasty image and resulted in hard feelings or fights
but to continue to play when you get tired or discover the opponent is so
short of money is stupid
sets are primarily for races in tournaments or spectator events
with artificial time restraints
If I were to play a person like lou,i would want to know i could win something
so i would like to freeze the stakes
If i felt like i was the better player,I would prefer to play 10 ahead
or if I liked the comfort of knowing i would have time to settle down and
ride out a bad break or two
On the other hand if i were to play a player with a record of succoring
to jitters or pressure,I might like to play a short race to take advantage of
his tendency to dog it
If i played John,i would be happy just to get him to play,he bets high,he doesn't quit when he gets stuck
he doesn't complain if I need to quit, in other words John is the perfect person to play
If I were Joihn ,I would require my oppnent to post a large amount,and require him to stick with the game by playing a long set,I would recognize the fact that I need time to settle in and therefore I would want to play 6 to 10 ahead
It seems to me thar these are the basic fundamentals of gambling
i would cover these with most of you Az fellas with limited real gambling experience
I call these the YELLOW SNOW basics
you teach your children "Never eat yellow snow"
An example i would tell John
There is only one reason to play pool for money
and that is to win money
Never get involved for personal reasons such as revenge,hate or
ego
I'm buying you dinner if you ever come to Hawaii.
You think like I do.
In my experiences, the best player usually wins the longer sets and the "ahead" games. They may win the "shorter sets", too, but there is less chance for the "underdogs" to win when the number of games are extended.
Back in the day, I would play for hours and hours, and days, if I thought I could beat someone...they would usually quit before I ever did. I always made sure I knew how much I was willing to lose, estimated how much I thought they would lose, and then made the game based upon numbers and percentages. In the long sessions, I came out on top way, way, way more times than I ever lost. When I got ahead, I usually would start steamrolling them and eventually win by a large margin of games. Short sets for large sums are for people who like to flip coins, unless you are playing Stevie Wonder.
Last edited: