Beware of USPS

I guess nobody ever reads my posts.

Use registered mail.

The registered mail costs money, I guess. Postal Priority is the best way to secure its delivery, but even that can fail from time to time.

For some reason, each Christmas when I send a gift to my Aunt Elsie in Florida, the post office sends it elsewhere. Last time, it ended up in Texas and got re-routed. Another time, it ended up in California and got re-routed.

Postal Priority isn't a guarantee, but it's a little more secure than regular mail, I guess.
 
Shipping

That's very true, I've shipped a full length Titlist cue in a PVC pipe via 2-day Priority for $9. Wrap each end in a single layer of tape and hammer on end caps. Hard to beat!

But I've never had an issue with a Triangle box except for a USPS employee in Florida cutting one open and stealing a shaft out. USPS refunded my insurance price on the spot.

Well when you do have issues with a cue getting damaged in a triangle box it will be to late.
At that moment you will most likely remember this thread and this conversation

Most of the time I ship USPS priority the customer has the cue before the tracking is posted online ..
I have complained to the post master ,, in one ear out the other ..
Average Government employee .

But it still leaves the buyer seller hanging out to dry ..
 
About registered mail, here's a horror story.

I mailed my 4Q estimated taxes one year to IRS via registered mail.

I kept watching my bank account, wondering when they were going to cash the check.

Finally, I called the IRS and asked if they received it, and the women, who was very nice, said they have no record of it and that if I paid the amount before January 30th, I wouldn't get fined a lot, so I did. She said the check probably got lost in the mail.

Three months later, I looked at my bank account and was overdrawn. Guess what? The IRS must have found my check and cashed it, 3 months later. I'll never forget it.

I pay online now, but still, even with registered mail, things fall through the cracks. I was told sometimes the letters may get stuck on the conveyor belt.
 
https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/postal-facts/top-10-things-to-know.htm

1.
The Postal Service receives NO tax dollars for operating expenses and relies on the sale of postage, products and services to fund its operations.

I don't think you worked for the usps.Did you work for mail processing or maintenance ?

U.S. Postal Service
American taxpayers give an $18 billion gift to the post office every year
Chris Matthews
Mar 27, 2015

The United States Postal Service's financial troubles have been well publicized in recent years. The worst of it came in 2012, when the USPS lost a whopping $15.9 billion dollars, followed by $4.8 billion and $5.3 billion in 2013 and 2014, respectively.

Link: http://fortune.com/2015/03/27/us-postal-service/

Post office officials have often attributed the losses to the decline in demand for first class mail in favor of more efficient modes of communication, and congressional mandates that the USPS do things like deliver mail on Saturdays and to unprofitable parts of the country. In fact, the USPS claims that if it weren't for such requirements, it would more or less break even.

But as Robert Shapiro—former Treasury undersecretary and chairman of the economic consultancy Sonecon—points out in a new analysis, American taxpayers subsidize the USPS at a rate that surpasses the costs associated with any Congressional mandate. He estimates that, all told, the subsidies and legal monopolies that Congress bestows upon the post office is worth $18 billion annually. These include:

Laws that bar any other shipping service from delivering mail and packages directly to residential and business mailboxes. Shapiro estimates that this gives the Post Office a $14 billion annual boost, more than three times what the Postal Regulatory Commission estimates it to be. Shapiro argues that the PRC's analysis doesn't take into account the productivity gains that the Post Office would be forced to make if it really had to compete for mailbox delivery. He points out that productivity at USPS has only grown by 0.7% per year versus 2.5% for its competition.

Tax breaks. The Post Office is exempt from state and local property and real estate taxes, along with other burdens like tolls, vehicle registration fees, and parking tickets. These exemptions save the USPS $2.18 billion per year.

Cheap borrowing. The Postal Service, writes Shapiro, "can borrow from the U.S. Treasury through the Federal Financing Bank, at highly-subsidized interest rates." It currently borrows the legal limit of $15.2 billion at a rate of 1.2%. Without this access, it would be paying somewhere between $415 million and $490 million per year more in interest.

Finally, Shapiro points out that the USPS pays its workers salaries and benefits far above the rates paid to similar workers in the private sector. Labor accounted for 78% of the organization's costs in 2014, "with about 89% of those costs involving employees represented by collective bargaining." These higher labor costs, plus the absence of a need to innovate due to government-granted monopolies, has freed the USPS from $20 billion in labor and productivity costs per year, Shapiro estimates. "While we do not technically count this as a subsidy," he writes, it represents an economic burden on others arising directly from USPS's monopoly position." Postage, for instance, would likely be cheaper for everyone if the organization were subject to the same competitive pressures as private firms.

It's remarkable that the United States, which has a reputation for being more free market-oriented than other rich nations, maintains this government-mandated monopoly. Over the past several decades, the process of European integration led to the deregulation and privatization of European postal monopolies, with generally good results.

Given the inability for Congress and the White House to agree on even basic legislation, it's unlikely that any major changes to the Post Office will be coming soon. After all, the Post Office's losses aren't an anomaly. It has spent a large part of its history in the red, as this chart from Shapiro shows:

Screen Shot 2015-03-27 at 9.49.58 AM

Meanwhile, the $18 billion in subsidies given to the USPS are spread imperceptibly over the entire country, while the costs of privatization would be borne heavily by a few. Folks in rural areas might have to pay much more to lure private businesses to deliver mail.

The Post Office employs 618,000 people—more than any civilian employer besides Wal Mart. Given the pay disparities between the Post Office and private employers, these people would be highly motivated to block any significant change to the current system.

That said, the benefits the rest of us bestow on the USPS are enormous. None of this will help you calm down the next time you are waiting on a line that just won't move at your local post office.
 
I worked in a large direct mail operation moving thousands of packages a month. We provided our clients with delivery performance reporting on all or our jobs. We used all 3 package shippers, UPS, USPS and FedEx. USPS was the worst service by far.

It sounds like your view is, in fact, based on some data from a high-volume user. Whether it was enough experience to be validly generalized -- all locations, all types of services, all types of packages and packaging, all time periods, etc. -- I don't know.
 
I love it when they sell PRIORITY Flat rate mail/package and then sell you insurance as well.
WTF? I'm paying for their priority and I still need insurance.
The insurance isn't cheap and not easy to file a claim on either.
 
I've had two bad experiences using the U.S. Post Office in the last month, both times sending via First Class mail. I sent a shaft to New York (from Los Angeles) and it took three weeks to get there! I followed it through the USPS tracking system and it showed arriving in New York after one week. It somehow got lost there and finally made it to it's destination nearly two weeks later. I had already refunded the money and my customer paid me again after he got it.

The second situation is ongoing and appears to be worse. This shaft was sent to Florida ten days ago. It still does not show up as being received by the post office, on their tracking system. I personally handed it to someone at the post office and he remembered when I asked him why it still does not show up in the system a week later. He explained that this can happen and I need to be patient. It's been nearly two weeks and nothing! I refunded the money to my customer today and told him to let me know if it ever arrives. I do have insurance on this package, but I was told I must wait 30 days to file a claim. No one at the post office wants to take any responsibility for my missing package, treating my calls and inquiries as more of a nuisance than anything else.

Seems that if you don't use Priority Mail you are taking your chances with the USPS. Even that may not work soon for all I know. I've lost a lot of faith in the USPS this past month. Just a word to the wise.

You said that you just handed the package to the clerk at USPS? You did not ask for a receipt? Without a receipt, you have no proof that you handed over the package to USPS, and if you would have asked for a receipt, then the clerk would have scanned the package into their system, and it would have at least shown that it was accepted by USPS online. If you did not ask for a receipt, then the clerk probably did not scan it into their system, and just took it into the back for sorting. At that time, it may have gotten lost, and was never scanned into the system. Without a receipt, you will not be able to prove that you handed it to a USPS employee, and will not be able to make an insurance claim. USPS is pretty reliable most of the time, but they do mess up at times.
 
https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/postal-facts/top-10-things-to-know.htm


1.
The Postal Service receives NO tax dollars for operating expenses and relies on the sale of postage, products and services to fund its operations.


I don't think you worked for the usps.Did you work for mail processing or maintenance ?

Look at your source.

It's easy to see that is a lie.

The USPS loses million/billions each year. How can the workers cash their pay checks when there are no profits to pay them? Next, look at any worker's paycheck and who wrote it?

There's nothing else needed to know to make the calculation.


Jeff Livingston


EDIT: I see jimmy did the research, above, and found some of the facts. The USPS is filled with dishonesty.
 
Last edited:
You said that you just handed the package to the clerk at USPS? You did not ask for a receipt? Without a receipt, you have no proof that you handed over the package to USPS, and if you would have asked for a receipt, then the clerk would have scanned the package into their system, and it would have at least shown that it was accepted by USPS online. If you did not ask for a receipt, then the clerk probably did not scan it into their system, and just took it into the back for sorting. At that time, it may have gotten lost, and was never scanned into the system. Without a receipt, you will not be able to prove that you handed it to a USPS employee, and will not be able to make an insurance claim. USPS is pretty reliable most of the time, but they do mess up at times.

When you print postage online you get a receipt, which I have. When I went back to inquire about the package a week later I showed them my receipt and they told me to be patient, and then gave me the phone number for the main post office. I asked the same question, if they scan it there and was told that the package is not scanned until it is received at the main post office downtown.
 
The registered mail costs money, I guess. Postal Priority is the best way to secure its delivery, but even that can fail from time to time.

For some reason, each Christmas when I send a gift to my Aunt Elsie in Florida, the post office sends it elsewhere. Last time, it ended up in Texas and got re-routed. Another time, it ended up in California and got re-routed.

Postal Priority isn't a guarantee, but it's a little more secure than regular mail, I guess.

You are incorrect. Registered mail is the best way to secure delivery. Of all the drama threads you've seen on this website none of them involved someone who used registered mail.
 
U.S. Postal Service
American taxpayers give an $18 billion gift to the post office every year
Chris Matthews
Mar 27, 2015

The United States Postal Service's financial troubles have been well publicized in recent years. The worst of it came in 2012, when the USPS lost a whopping $15.9 billion dollars, followed by $4.8 billion and $5.3 billion in 2013 and 2014, respectively.

Link: http://fortune.com/2015/03/27/us-postal-service/

Post office officials have often attributed the losses to the decline in demand for first class mail in favor of more efficient modes of communication, and congressional mandates that the USPS do things like deliver mail on Saturdays and to unprofitable parts of the country. In fact, the USPS claims that if it weren't for such requirements, it would more or less break even.

But as Robert Shapiro—former Treasury undersecretary and chairman of the economic consultancy Sonecon—points out in a new analysis, American taxpayers subsidize the USPS at a rate that surpasses the costs associated with any Congressional mandate. He estimates that, all told, the subsidies and legal monopolies that Congress bestows upon the post office is worth $18 billion annually. These include:

Laws that bar any other shipping service from delivering mail and packages directly to residential and business mailboxes. Shapiro estimates that this gives the Post Office a $14 billion annual boost, more than three times what the Postal Regulatory Commission estimates it to be. Shapiro argues that the PRC's analysis doesn't take into account the productivity gains that the Post Office would be forced to make if it really had to compete for mailbox delivery. He points out that productivity at USPS has only grown by 0.7% per year versus 2.5% for its competition.

Tax breaks. The Post Office is exempt from state and local property and real estate taxes, along with other burdens like tolls, vehicle registration fees, and parking tickets. These exemptions save the USPS $2.18 billion per year.

Cheap borrowing. The Postal Service, writes Shapiro, "can borrow from the U.S. Treasury through the Federal Financing Bank, at highly-subsidized interest rates." It currently borrows the legal limit of $15.2 billion at a rate of 1.2%. Without this access, it would be paying somewhere between $415 million and $490 million per year more in interest.

Finally, Shapiro points out that the USPS pays its workers salaries and benefits far above the rates paid to similar workers in the private sector. Labor accounted for 78% of the organization's costs in 2014, "with about 89% of those costs involving employees represented by collective bargaining." These higher labor costs, plus the absence of a need to innovate due to government-granted monopolies, has freed the USPS from $20 billion in labor and productivity costs per year, Shapiro estimates. "While we do not technically count this as a subsidy," he writes, it represents an economic burden on others arising directly from USPS's monopoly position." Postage, for instance, would likely be cheaper for everyone if the organization were subject to the same competitive pressures as private firms.

It's remarkable that the United States, which has a reputation for being more free market-oriented than other rich nations, maintains this government-mandated monopoly. Over the past several decades, the process of European integration led to the deregulation and privatization of European postal monopolies, with generally good results.

Given the inability for Congress and the White House to agree on even basic legislation, it's unlikely that any major changes to the Post Office will be coming soon. After all, the Post Office's losses aren't an anomaly. It has spent a large part of its history in the red, as this chart from Shapiro shows:

Screen Shot 2015-03-27 at 9.49.58 AM

Meanwhile, the $18 billion in subsidies given to the USPS are spread imperceptibly over the entire country, while the costs of privatization would be borne heavily by a few. Folks in rural areas might have to pay much more to lure private businesses to deliver mail.

The Post Office employs 618,000 people—more than any civilian employer besides Wal Mart. Given the pay disparities between the Post Office and private employers, these people would be highly motivated to block any significant change to the current system.

That said, the benefits the rest of us bestow on the USPS are enormous. None of this will help you calm down the next time you are waiting on a line that just won't move at your local post office.

in this article where does it say that the USPS is getting tax payers money from the government ?
 

What if I was to tell you that the U.S. Postal Service actually made over $1 billion in profit over the first three quarters of this fiscal year? You would probably think I was nuts after all the doom and gloom you’ve heard regarding the future of the Postal Service. There is some very good rational for this conclusion and for hope that the Postal Service will continue to be a self-sustaining and vibrant government entity.

The first thing I want people to know is that the Postal Service receives no taxpayer dollars. Zero, none, nada. The Postal Service has been self-sufficient for many, many years.

In this fiscal year, revenue is up in all aspects of the Postal Service First Class, packages and advertising. Overall, revenue for the USPS is up $1 billion from the same time last year.

Why does everyone seem to think the Postal Service is losing money? Congress has a lot to do with it.

The Postal Service is required to pay $5.5 billion annually to pre-fund retiree’s health care benefits for 75 years. So the Postal Service is paying for healthcare for future retiree’s that have not been born yet. I know this sounds preposterous and it would take way too long to explain here, so please Google “Postal Service pre-funding” and you will find numerous articles from well-respected news agencies on the topic.

On top of this, a few years ago, the Office of Budget and Management discovered that the Postal Service had overpaid for their retirees’ retirement benefits to the tune of somewhere between $50 billion to $70 billion. Again, feel free to Google “Postal Service over-funding” to back up my claim. Now is where things get a little bizarre.

Congress will not give back the overpayments because then it would look like they were adding to the deficit. At the same time, Congress will not relieve the Postal Service of the obligation to pre-fund retiree’s health care benefits because here again it would look like they were adding to the deficit. Most in Congress agree that the pre-funding should be dropped but are afraid to act for fear of being accused of raising the deficit. So, the solution seems to be that the Postal Service defaults on these payments (as it has for 2013 and will for 2014) and there will be no real repercussions.

So when you hear the Postal Service is losing billions of dollars, you need to take into account that $5.5 billion is money that they should not have to pay and that they are not going to pay. If you happen to hear that the Postal Service lost $4.2 billion for the first three quarters of this year, that really means they made over $1 billion.

Why does the Postal Service not explain this? There is a big drive in this country to privatize parts of the Postal Service. If the Postal Service is alive and profitable no one would call for eliminating six days per week a week delivery or closing facilities and reducing hours at current facilities. These actions will make the Postal Service less efficient and therefore less profitable, making it easier to auction off some of the profitable parts to big business. This would not be good for Alaska.

The Juneau to Barrow or Anchorage to Nome routes are not going to be profitable. I would like to thank Sen. Mark Begich and the rest of the Alaska Congressional Delegation for their efforts in trying to prevent this from happening.

As for me, I see the Postal Service continuing to be a crucial and profitable government entity for many years to come.
 
I've had two bad experiences using the U.S. Post Office in the last month, both times sending via First Class mail. I sent a shaft to New York (from Los Angeles) and it took three weeks to get there! I followed it through the USPS tracking system and it showed arriving in New York after one week. It somehow got lost there and finally made it to it's destination nearly two weeks later. I had already refunded the money and my customer paid me again after he got it.

The second situation is ongoing and appears to be worse. This shaft was sent to Florida ten days ago. It still does not show up as being received by the post office, on their tracking system. I personally handed it to someone at the post office and he remembered when I asked him why it still does not show up in the system a week later. He explained that this can happen and I need to be patient. It's been nearly two weeks and nothing! I refunded the money to my customer today and told him to let me know if it ever arrives. I do have insurance on this package, but I was told I must wait 30 days to file a claim. No one at the post office wants to take any responsibility for my missing package, treating my calls and inquiries as more of a nuisance than anything else.

Seems that if you don't use Priority Mail you are taking your chances with the USPS. Even that may not work soon for all I know. I've lost a lot of faith in the USPS this past month. Just a word to the wise.

Then you should specify USPS First Class, kind of you got what you paid for.
 
:sorry:


I'm still wondering if this is all a joke.


No one ships cues or shafts first class.


First Class for real? OMG!!!!!! You must of saved like $1.98 to do that with no insurance.


:rolleyes:




.
 
As a typical government entity, the USPS has always had trouble maintaining solvency and credibility..They flush millions of our tax $$$ down the drain every year!.. A well run private company (like UPS) could easily make a profit carrying the mail, and at less cost!

With the advent of social media, (twitter, facebook etc.) the need for 'snail mail' has been greatly reduced..The USPS has failed to downsize accordingly..Sadly, it will only get worse! :(

Hi Dick,

You should stick to discussing 1 Pocket, a topic you know about.
I've worked for the USPS for over 32 years now. I can assure you, since 1971 we receive no tax dollars from anybody. We were changed from the US Postal Department to the US Postal Service when Nixon signed all the documents.
The only money we make is from selling our products and services.

I know you were trying to plug UPS, your old employer, but the BIG 3 are pretty much all doing the same. I refer to UPS, FEDEX and the USPS.
We actually have contracts with UPS and FEDEX. For UPS it's not cost effective to drive to every door-every day so they pay us to deliver it the "last mile" as they say. They drop packages on our back dock so we can deliver to their customers.
With FEDEX we use their cargo planes to get mail across the country in a more timely manner. This allows us to move tons of mail without the worry of passengers/baggage bumping us from weight restrictions.

As for the OP, Jay, your packages should have been assigned a tracking number when mailed. It would be on the receipt and each package gets an "acceptance" scan.
If you use an online service for printing your postage, you have a tracking number already. Be sure to have the clerk scan each item before you leave. I know many customers didn't want to wait in line to get items scanned, so they just left them on the end of the counter and walked out. I repeat, be sure to have them scan all packages and get the receipt.
Some packages do get damaged in handling and the box gets separated from the contents. It sucks, but it does happen. I hope they find your package.....
 
About registered mail, here's a horror story.

I mailed my 4Q estimated taxes one year to IRS via registered mail.

I kept watching my bank account, wondering when they were going to cash the check.

Finally, I called the IRS and asked if they received it, and the women, who was very nice, said they have no record of it and that if I paid the amount before January 30th, I wouldn't get fined a lot, so I did. She said the check probably got lost in the mail.

Three months later, I looked at my bank account and was overdrawn. Guess what? The IRS must have found my check and cashed it, 3 months later. I'll never forget it.

I pay online now, but still, even with registered mail, things fall through the cracks. I was told sometimes the letters may get stuck on the conveyor belt.

JAM,

I think you are confusing registered mail with certified mail?
Certified is usually for important documents that somebody wants a signature on.
This service goes through normal mail stream and gets a signature upon delivery.
Registered is for high dollar merchandise which requires insurance, usually more than 1,000 and goes up to 25,000. This service does not go into the normal mail stream, gets signed by literally every employee that touches it and gets a signature upon delivery.
Hope this helps.....
 
Originally Posted by jimmyg View Post
U.S. Postal Service
American taxpayers give an $18 billion gift to the post office every year
Chris Matthews

Mar 27, 2015

The United States Postal Service's financial troubles have been well publicized in recent years. The worst of it came in 2012, when the USPS lost a whopping $15.9 billion dollars, followed by $4.8 billion and $5.3 billion in 2013 and 2014, respectively.

Link: http://fortune.com/2015/03/27/us-postal-service/

Post office officials have often attributed the losses to the decline in demand for first class mail in favor of more efficient modes of communication, and congressional mandates that the USPS do things like deliver mail on Saturdays and to unprofitable parts of the country. In fact, the USPS claims that if it weren't for such requirements, it would more or less break even.

But as Robert Shapiro—former Treasury undersecretary and chairman of the economic consultancy Sonecon—points out in a new analysis, American taxpayers subsidize the USPS at a rate that surpasses the costs associated with any Congressional mandate. He estimates that, all told, the subsidies and legal monopolies that Congress bestows upon the post office is worth $18 billion annually. These include:

Laws that bar any other shipping service from delivering mail and packages directly to residential and business mailboxes. Shapiro estimates that this gives the Post Office a $14 billion annual boost, more than three times what the Postal Regulatory Commission estimates it to be. Shapiro argues that the PRC's analysis doesn't take into account the productivity gains that the Post Office would be forced to make if it really had to compete for mailbox delivery. He points out that productivity at USPS has only grown by 0.7% per year versus 2.5% for its competition.

Tax breaks. The Post Office is exempt from state and local property and real estate taxes, along with other burdens like tolls, vehicle registration fees, and parking tickets. These exemptions save the USPS $2.18 billion per year.

Cheap borrowing. The Postal Service, writes Shapiro, "can borrow from the U.S. Treasury through the Federal Financing Bank, at highly-subsidized interest rates." It currently borrows the legal limit of $15.2 billion at a rate of 1.2%. Without this access, it would be paying somewhere between $415 million and $490 million per year more in interest.

Finally, Shapiro points out that the USPS pays its workers salaries and benefits far above the rates paid to similar workers in the private sector. Labor accounted for 78% of the organization's costs in 2014, "with about 89% of those costs involving employees represented by collective bargaining." These higher labor costs, plus the absence of a need to innovate due to government-granted monopolies, has freed the USPS from $20 billion in labor and productivity costs per year, Shapiro estimates. "While we do not technically count this as a subsidy," he writes, it represents an economic burden on others arising directly from USPS's monopoly position." Postage, for instance, would likely be cheaper for everyone if the organization were subject to the same competitive pressures as private firms.

It's remarkable that the United States, which has a reputation for being more free market-oriented than other rich nations, maintains this government-mandated monopoly. Over the past several decades, the process of European integration led to the deregulation and privatization of European postal monopolies, with generally good results.

Given the inability for Congress and the White House to agree on even basic legislation, it's unlikely that any major changes to the Post Office will be coming soon. After all, the Post Office's losses aren't an anomaly. It has spent a large part of its history in the red, as this chart from Shapiro shows:

Screen Shot 2015-03-27 at 9.49.58 AM

Meanwhile, the $18 billion in subsidies given to the USPS are spread imperceptibly over the entire country, while the costs of privatization would be borne heavily by a few. Folks in rural areas might have to pay much more to lure private businesses to deliver mail.

The Post Office employs 618,000 people—more than any civilian employer besides Wal Mart. Given the pay disparities between the Post Office and private employers, these people would be highly motivated to block any significant change to the current system.

That said, the benefits the rest of us bestow on the USPS are enormous. None of this will help you calm down the next time you are waiting on a line that just won't move at your local post office.

in this article where does it say that the USPS is getting tax payers money from the government ?

The costs of government subsidies. whether in the form of direct payments, tax breaks, or cheap borrowing are ultimately all borne by the taxpayer. In addition, because the USPS is a serial losing enterprise, it will eventually require a major bailout which will also be borne by the taxpayer. Not looking for a debate, I'm out. J

US Postal Service: Over $47 Billion In Losses In The Past Decade And Counting

by Tyler Durden Aug 11, 2014 12:09 PM

Curious what pure, unadulterated government efficiency in practice, if not in theory, looks like? Then the following chart of USPS operating profits, pardon, losses over the past decade should be sufficient. The punchline: having generated revenues of nearly $700 billion in the past 40 quarters, the USPS has been bleeding red ink more or less consistently since 2006, and has now generated just over $47 billion in operating losses over the past ten years.

USPS%20P%26L.jpg

It gets better.

From the WSJ: "The USPS said its total liabilities were $67.16 billion at the end of the period, compared with $23.16 billion in assets."

That means the net capital deficiency, or "cost", to keep the USPS alive, amounts to some $44 billion as of this moment (which includes $3.1 billion in contributions from the US government and a $47 billion deficit since the 1971 reorganization).

Continuing: "The Postal Service reached its $15 billion credit limit with the Treasury Department in 2012. Under law, the USPS must pay its own way. It doesn't receive an annual taxpayer subsidy, but is reimbursed by Congress for some services such as delivering mail to the blind and overseas voters. The agency is saddled with a congressional mandate that requires it to prefund more than $5.5 billion annually for health benefits for future retirees. The service said Monday that it won't be able to make its required $5.7 billion payment by Sept. 30."

In other words, more pension accruals that will never be paid out until, finally, the administration has no option but to make the payment on behalf of the postal service (thank you PBGC).

Finally, one may ask: why doesn't this bloated, anachronistic, money-losing zombie just go away and make way for the far more efficient and nimble private sector? After all, there are countless companies which could step in and do what the USPS does for a fraction of the cost?

Simple. The answer:

489,727 career employees.
137,037 non-career employees.

Or, as they are better known in D.C., voters.
 
Back
Top