For someone who knew so much about aiming he should've realized it does have some merit to it.
You say your system is a professional aiming system. What qaulfies a system to be a professional system?
The quarters in contrast to CTE is about like a sapling and a redwood. Hal knew that the quarters was guess-work and had zero connection to the geometry of any regulation table. He knew it had some merit at the amateur level but like I said he never wasted any energy with it so much as a single shot.
CTE as a pro system.
Objective
Prescription for how to really use ones vision
Prescription for how to align
Does not limit proficiency in any way
Spin adjustments are very simple with CTE
Practice is simplified because shots fall into 4 repeatable catagories
CTE reduces the target to the CB and nothing on the OB
Playoff/shootouts result in defined shots out of the kitchen
Commentary lends itself to naming shots and what a player can see or should see
CTE can be objectively communicated to students in EXACT terms
Pool is visual.....CTE stops the search for what to see so that stroke, speed, spin and strategy can be dealt with with vision out of the way
Pros use it and have won plenty with it
There's more but that's enough for now.
Stan Shuffett