Im not accusing anyone of anything, but Im closer to 50/50 on that one. If he was indeed robbed, yes it was likely someone who knew him and knew the money was there. Police reports prove nothing other than one was filed. Anyone could break out a window, ransack their own house, and file a police report stating they had whatever stolen. The existence of a report itself means less than one would think....
. :thumbup:
I agree to an extent; however, a police report means there is actually a police investigation.
* The amount falls under a felony offence
* The fact that the money belongs to other falls under embezzlement
As a LO I would jump at a opportunity to clear my name and the polygraph questions are quite simple.
I even understand that a polygraph is not always conclusive; however, I wouldn't understand a refusal to take one...
After all, we are talking about $19,000 of other people's money here.
It sucks for all involved, even with a cleared poly there would still be an ugly appearance...
However, the funds were entrusted to the LO; he should be sitting at the police station requesting an investigation and a self polygraph.
Regardless...
The loss/thief of the funds does not alleviate the LO from payment, he owns this.
Loss/Thief of money for a mortgage, car payment, electric bill does not negate the debt; companies my work vs cutting off you lights but the debt is still there.
Last edited: