I think either could and can win. It could be close, but it could also be a blowout. If so, I lean Fedor winning if a blowout. Even though I think Fedor may be the #1 player on the planet, in this format, I'm taking Shane if I'm forced to pick. I'm predicting it will be relatively close with either winning by less than 15 games.
Shane's a thoroughbred and especially with gambling, year after year after year, it's more or less the same thing. We have all these players from all over the world we think are going to beat him in these long race matches. His win ratio is incredible, especially in 10ball. If I were to guess, I would say, other than maybe tourneys that would be considered majors, he's more motivated for these than anything. I really don't even think the size of the bet matters as much as others think. I think he's more prideful than most and has a drive stronger than most to continue to prove he's the best. It doesn't even matter if he is or isn't, what matters is how he thinks and feels about it. I think when he has this kind of drive, that's where he practices like a madman and turns into a machine. How many times have we seen him play near perfect and have over 50% BNR stats in these long marathons?
The longer it goes, the longer the match, the more of a cyborg his opponent is, the more he consistently shows how to dig deep and figure out a way. What he did against Chang in one of his last marathons was spectacular, especially with how close it was. We all know Chang is a stone cold killer on the table with pretty much no one wanting to play him in 10ball. I think Shane was even the underdog in that as I'm assuming he'll be in this. Now that Shane's Defensive game is mostly on par with anyone else out there, I will continue to like Shane in these until someone takes him out in convincing fashion, which has pretty much never happened.