This would be a Very entertaining match.
Race to 1000 points over 3 days.
My pick Ronnie in the long haul.
Race to 1000 points over 3 days.
My pick Ronnie in the long haul.
This would be a Very entertaining match.
Race to 1000 points over 3 days.
My pick Ronnie in the long haul.
Is this actually happening or are we just sitting and talking on the rail?
How much time you got 'cause that will never happen.I think an interesting match would be the Lion and the Rocket...
...race to 3...full rack snooker
...200 points...straight pool
Play till someone wins both.
Shane all time every time.
Ronnie isn't into pool and he knows why.
He wouldn't have a chance, especially in a game that involves so much knowledge like 14.1.
Put someone in like Steve Davis 15 years ago and it would be a different story.
How much time you got 'cause that will never happen.
I love to watch Ronnie play snooker
He is by far the best ever at least I think so
English means class
That would be the UK History Channel's series "American Hustle". There were four 45-minute (without commercials) programs. Here is episode 1, which I expect to disappear shortly:Ronnie did a few shows where he was going to do a travelog. Traveling the US, he was going to get in action when he could trying to be a bit undercover. ...
That would be the UK History Channel's series "American Hustle". There were four 45-minute (without commercials) programs. Here is episode 1, which I expect to disappear shortly:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzDzWYhotgI
Ronnie did a few shows where he was going to do a travelog. Traveling the US, he was going to get in action when he could trying to be a bit undercover. I think the few of those shows I saw indicated that Ronnie was more like an "A" player than like a pro on a pool table.
The situation is flip-flopped or an even bigger gap if a pool player is foolish enough to get on a snooker table with Ronnie. Put any US pro pool player on a snooker table with Ronnie and unless Ronnie is feeling merciful the pro would never get to six playing twenty-one frames.
I spent a couple hours a day on a snooker table for about two years in my younger days. Got pretty fair and it helped my accuracy and position play but at the same time I was playing a few hours a day on a snooker table I was playing about three times that much on a pool table. No snooker table around me for a few decades. I tried snooker with a pool cue like I used to do fairly recently. Holy mackerel! Adjustments were huge. I hit a few balls on the snooker table with a friend's 11.8mm REVO and it worked much better. Never the less, pool is pool and snooker is snooker. If a great young pool player like Filler dedicated several years of intense effort to snooker he might be able to play a little.
The same thing if a snooker player tried to go the other way, it wouldn't be an overnight thing. Ronnie said it would take him five years to play pool. I assume he meant at the same level he plays snooker. I would suspect more like two years if he focused solely on pool.
It would have been interesting if a young Efren had spent a few years on a snooker table instead of carom or after his carom days. One of the most flexible pool players in the world if not the most flexible, he might have made the jump. We will never know.
Modern snooker players are better at pretty much all aspects of cue sports than pool players. Pocketing, spin, position play, you name it. They still don't make the jump to pool tables easily. I think it is the bigger heavier balls more than the tables. Snooker is usually played on heated tables now too I believe.
Anyway, a thousand points on a pool table, I think a pool player would get out front and cruise. On a snooker table a snooker player would do much the same. The games are a lot more different than they appear to be to a casual observer.
Hu