According to SVB and Scott on FB they played 33 hours in Vegas and broke even at 8/7. SVB on FB said he wouldn't play Scott even. Gotta love Frost stirring it up!
I'm sure you read it wrong
I was there
8 7 Svb won fast
Then 9 8 they broke even
According to SVB and Scott on FB they played 33 hours in Vegas and broke even at 8/7. SVB on FB said he wouldn't play Scott even. Gotta love Frost stirring it up!
I'm sure you read it wrong
I was there
8 7 Svb won fast
Then 9 8 they broke even
A reality check is strongly needed here....Mitch Ellerman just beat Scott a few days ago on that table, in the finals, to win the Arizona State One Pocket Championship.
- Threat
the freezer prolly get defrosted soon.
I wasn't suggesting that Ike play Scott, it was in reference to "chicago style one pocket"... "squeeze him like a boa"
Ike is the biggest one pocket name in Chicago that I KNOW... any his style is anything but that.
Scott is a friend of mine but his best game left him two years ago. Shane is on the improve every time he plays. Scott hasn't finished well in a tournament for quite some time and he hasn't won for the cash in I don't know how long. Now could he regain form? I think so but woofing doesn't bring back your game. Playing does.
Mitch ain't never seen a shot he didn't like. I mean that in a good way.A reality check is strongly needed here....Mitch Ellerman just beat Scott a few days ago on that table, in the finals, to win the Arizona State One Pocket Championship.
- Threat
We are talking about gambling in this thread.....that's the "reality check".
Chris Gentle gives ike 10-8 and ike is loser....... but chris is only a recreational player now a days.
Too bad Shane doesn't have any experience in at gambling in long sets. Oh wait. Dat Dem Der is a reality check.
Actually Shane does have experience gambling in long sets mostly playing 10 Ball and Bar Tables. If you added the hours together, Scott has played 5 times more gambling hours (at least) at One Pocket than Shane.
Shane is fundamentally a better player than Scott.....however, I'm not convinced he's any tougher......and sometimes that's the deciding factor when playing "for the cash".
'The Game is the Teacher'
Actually Shane does have experience gambling in long sets mostly playing 10 Ball and Bar Tables. If you added the hours together, Scott has played 5 times more gambling hours (at least) at One Pocket than Shane.
Shane is fundamentally a better player than Scott.....however, I'm not convinced he's any tougher......and sometimes that's the deciding factor when playing "for the cash".
'The Game is the Teacher'
Shane is fundamentally a better player than Scott.....however, I'm not convinced he's any tougher......and sometimes that's the deciding factor when playing "for the cash".
'The Game is the Teacher'
Like shooting the runner do yea ... It's a copy and paste/quote -> go to the source ... and bring about 10K.
The spelling police has more work to do too .... and not just on "The Freezer's" posts either. Hit 'em all up.
View attachment 330084
Ask efren how tuff shane is at 1 pocket.
While I do agree that is how it often is, this in a way reminds me of one of the best life lessons my old man taught me at a young age.....
A young bull and an old bull are standing atop a hill over looking a herd of cows.
The young bull says "HEY! WHY DON'T WE RUN DOWN THERE AND F ONE OF THEM COWS???"
The old bull calmly says "Why don't we walk down there and f' them all....."
Shane is f'ing them all... Pimpin ain't easy, but it's big bidness.