I've never met either of you but I watched the last one. You were clearly stealing. Unless your game has declined or you suspect JB was sandbagging I believe you could play him anywhere and win.
Just my 2 cents.
I agree. Clearly stealing.

I've never met either of you but I watched the last one. You were clearly stealing. Unless your game has declined or you suspect JB was sandbagging I believe you could play him anywhere and win.
Just my 2 cents.
He knew Lou wouldn't accept those terms.
1
The insinuation was that he laid down. He never outright said it. I don't think for a second that he did but IF he did then the only answer to my challenge now ought to be yes.
Anyway, the way I see it is that set is done, we did that dance and I lost.
Here it is a year and a half later and I want to play him again. They tried to high roll me and raise the bet to $25,000 last time a few days before the match. So 20k is the right bet I think all things considered.
We didn't negotiate any sets beyond one so I have no issues there. I won't even say it's nitty if they don't play. As far as I am concerned that set and all the drama around it is a closed chapter in my life and the only connection for me is that I still think I can beat the guy. I know that my best game wasn't on display and that's the only real motivation here for me.
I don't want any drama, all that is out of my system. Just two guys on the table for 20k playing some one pocket. I learned the hard way that the theatrics mixed with adrenaline-fueled hatred don't mix with maintaining the focus I would need to play the best I can play.
My only thought is if Lou has people who think he is stealing then they should be doing everything possible to convince him to take the short drive to Oklahoma City and steal the money. I am not stealing. I think I will have to play good and even a little over my head but I have outrun the nuts before so it could happen.
We will see what happens by next Friday.
I'm really at a loss as to what is so strange about these terms to some folks. They seem quite reasonable to me. #5 is a little strange and might need clarification or modification to prevent a very boring match but as long as it's just a "coaching" issue I see no problem with it.
Lou should jump on it, I would. That being said I'd have to put my money on JB in a rematch. I haven't been back to OKC since I moved from there 10 years ago but I think I'd make the trip for this one. If we could get Swanson to come we might even get an undercard match: Blind Preacher vs Gimp Limey Troll.
Anyway good luck John, we haven't seen each other in many moons but you were always nice to me so I'm pulling for you. If James is still out there and sober enough, pick his brain about strategy until neither of you can stand it any more. Hope it works out for you.
He knew Lou wouldn't accept those terms.
1
Why wouldn't he? I can't think of one good reason, other than the inability to raise the money.
For people who don't understand why Lou, the clear favorite, wouldn't jump at the chance to take the money, think of it this way.
Here's the expectation, assuming Lou is the 3-2 favorite:
.60 (chance I win) x $20000 (amount I win)
+ .40 (chance I lose) x -$20000 (amount I lose)
= 12000 - 8000 = $4000 expectation
So let's say Lou has an expected value of $4000 for this match.
But here’s another way to see it:
.60 (chance I win) x $20000 (amount I win)
+ .40 (chance I lose) x -$20000 (amount I lose)
+ 1.0 x weeks of BS drama
+ 1.0 x JB in my life again
+ 1.0 x it won’t stop here even if I win
So the question might not be should I take an expected value of $4000, it might be this: is $4000 worth the weeks of BS drama with JB in my life again and no chance of it stopping even if I do win. I'm not at all sure that's a good bet.
What was the score of their other match?
One I can think of.
John wants this match.
He needs his record cleared, his name exonerated and some sense of vindication.
How much is that worth to Lou?
Is this challenge the byproduct of activity going on in the Samlam thread ?
Sent from my XT830C using Tapatalk
For people who don't understand why Lou, the clear favorite, wouldn't jump at the chance to take the money, think of it this way.
Here's the expectation, assuming Lou is the 3-2 favorite:
.60 (chance I win) x $20000 (amount I win)
+ .40 (chance I lose) x -$20000 (amount I lose)
= 12000 - 8000 = $4000 expectation
So let's say Lou has an expected value of $4000 for this match.
But here’s another way to see it:
.60 (chance I win) x $20000 (amount I win)
+ .40 (chance I lose) x -$20000 (amount I lose)
+ 1.0 x weeks of BS drama
+ 1.0 x JB in my life again
+ 1.0 x it won’t stop here even if I win
So the question might not be should I take an expected value of $4000, it might be this: is $4000 worth the weeks of BS drama with JB in my life again and no chance of it stopping even if I do win. I'm not at all sure that's a good bet.
For people who don't understand why Lou, the clear favorite, wouldn't jump at the chance to take the money, think of it this way.
Here's the expectation, assuming Lou is the 3-2 favorite:
.60 (chance I win) x $20000 (amount I win)
+ .40 (chance I lose) x -$20000 (amount I lose)
= 12000 - 8000 = $4000 expectation
So let's say Lou has an expected value of $4000 for this match.
But here’s another way to see it:
.60 (chance I win) x $20000 (amount I win)
+ .40 (chance I lose) x -$20000 (amount I lose)
+ 1.0 x weeks of BS drama
+ 1.0 x JB in my life again
+ 1.0 x it won’t stop here even if I win
So the question might not be should I take an expected value of $4000, it might be this: is $4000 worth the weeks of BS drama with JB in my life again and no chance of it stopping even if I do win. I'm not at all sure that's a good bet.
One I can think of.
John wants this match.
He needs his record cleared, his name exonerated and some sense of vindication.
How much is that worth to Lou?
One I can think of.
John wants this match.
He needs his record cleared, his name exonerated and some sense of vindication.
How much is that worth to Lou?