Teacherjohn
Registered
crying over the rack
Hey Jay,
why don't you do this to eliminate all the racking nonsense......balls must be racked in numerical order with one in front and nine in the middle AND the cue ball must be placed on the head spot. That's the way we used to do it the olden days and I don't recall the wingball going in a million times in a row. Also much tougher to make a ball. I talked with Kim Davenport about that and he said breaking from the head spot
is too easy to scratch in the side. Too bad.....they will just need to hit the one ball squarely won't they?
Hey Jay,
why don't you do this to eliminate all the racking nonsense......balls must be racked in numerical order with one in front and nine in the middle AND the cue ball must be placed on the head spot. That's the way we used to do it the olden days and I don't recall the wingball going in a million times in a row. Also much tougher to make a ball. I talked with Kim Davenport about that and he said breaking from the head spot
is too easy to scratch in the side. Too bad.....they will just need to hit the one ball squarely won't they?