**warning...long, but interesting, story coming**
While I know that most players have good ettiquette (or at least try to), I also know that there are always a couple of bad apples. What I still havent figured out, is how to react when a one of these bad apples is chucked at your head from behind you. Let me explain...
About a month ago, my boyfriend - lets call him V, a 70 speed - was playing in a USPPA tournament and for his first match he was put up against an aquaintance of ours from our APA days - lets call him D, a 60 speed. It was an even race to 5 and D quickly got up 4-1.
V started playing some heavy defense, and D would literally take a good 5 minutes per kick
. Well, vic ended up 3-fouling him to bring it to 4-2. After the rack, D sarcastically said, "what? Am I that intimidating?" V cooly said, "yeah, you are."
During the next rack, the spread was not looking pretty so V again played safe and D fouled (1). V proceeded to play safe and had the cue ball all but in jail (a guaranteed 2nd foul). At this point D got up and angrily said, "what?! you don't want to play?! are you afraid to shoot?! "
V simply replied, "why dont YOU shoot?"
Rather than shoot, D walked off, saying "I'm not shooting that, I'm taking a break."
V said "okay, I'm having a cigarette then" When we came back inside, D was sitting down not even looking at the table, when he finally went back up to the table, he spent another 3-4 minutes analyzing his shot. He fouled (2).
By now, there were a decent amount of spectators, or rather, witnesses, watching the match. D then walked straight to the scorekeeper, who happened to be a good friend of ours and said "How the HELL did this guy get to be a 70 speed?! He can't even shoot?! He shoots like a 30!" People just chuckled.
To make a long story short, V ended up 3 fouling him that game to make it 4-3, then 3 fouled him once again to make it 4-4. Case game, he ran out. Throughout the match D was *****ing and moaning. After the match V went to shake his hand and said "good game, D". D wouldn't shake his hand. He was shaking his head and packing up his cues saying "you know, if you want to be a 70 speed, why don't you learn to shoot?!" V, who had maintained his cool and had been completely polite up to this point said back "why dont you learn to kick?"
V said, " You know, D, I'm really disappointed... I always thought you were a nice guy..." D cut in, snapping, "I thought YOU were a nice guy..."
(apparently it thought it was really mean of V to play safe)
anyways, thats the bulk of the story... I could write out all of D's rants that night, but I think we all get the gist. here's what I don't get... Why be sooo angry at your opponent for playing safe? And why show your frustration like that? At first V was just playing safe to get back in the game, but once he saw what a pr*ck D was being, he intentionally tried to 3 foul him again and again
.
While I understand that 3 foul can be a sucky way to lose, I don't think talking sh*t to your opponent will make him lighten up on you at all. Also, I dont get why D would complain about V being rated too high. If he wanted V to be a 30 speed, I'm sure V would have gladly obliged and beat him with a spot.
Word about the match spread like wildfire and people were laughing about it for days.
What are everyones thoughts on the 3-foul rule? Do you think D had the right to get that worked up over it? I think that no matter what happens on the table, each match should end with a handshake, wholehearted or not.
While I know that most players have good ettiquette (or at least try to), I also know that there are always a couple of bad apples. What I still havent figured out, is how to react when a one of these bad apples is chucked at your head from behind you. Let me explain...
About a month ago, my boyfriend - lets call him V, a 70 speed - was playing in a USPPA tournament and for his first match he was put up against an aquaintance of ours from our APA days - lets call him D, a 60 speed. It was an even race to 5 and D quickly got up 4-1.
V started playing some heavy defense, and D would literally take a good 5 minutes per kick
During the next rack, the spread was not looking pretty so V again played safe and D fouled (1). V proceeded to play safe and had the cue ball all but in jail (a guaranteed 2nd foul). At this point D got up and angrily said, "what?! you don't want to play?! are you afraid to shoot?! "
V simply replied, "why dont YOU shoot?"
Rather than shoot, D walked off, saying "I'm not shooting that, I'm taking a break."
V said "okay, I'm having a cigarette then" When we came back inside, D was sitting down not even looking at the table, when he finally went back up to the table, he spent another 3-4 minutes analyzing his shot. He fouled (2).
By now, there were a decent amount of spectators, or rather, witnesses, watching the match. D then walked straight to the scorekeeper, who happened to be a good friend of ours and said "How the HELL did this guy get to be a 70 speed?! He can't even shoot?! He shoots like a 30!" People just chuckled.
To make a long story short, V ended up 3 fouling him that game to make it 4-3, then 3 fouled him once again to make it 4-4. Case game, he ran out. Throughout the match D was *****ing and moaning. After the match V went to shake his hand and said "good game, D". D wouldn't shake his hand. He was shaking his head and packing up his cues saying "you know, if you want to be a 70 speed, why don't you learn to shoot?!" V, who had maintained his cool and had been completely polite up to this point said back "why dont you learn to kick?"
V said, " You know, D, I'm really disappointed... I always thought you were a nice guy..." D cut in, snapping, "I thought YOU were a nice guy..."
anyways, thats the bulk of the story... I could write out all of D's rants that night, but I think we all get the gist. here's what I don't get... Why be sooo angry at your opponent for playing safe? And why show your frustration like that? At first V was just playing safe to get back in the game, but once he saw what a pr*ck D was being, he intentionally tried to 3 foul him again and again
While I understand that 3 foul can be a sucky way to lose, I don't think talking sh*t to your opponent will make him lighten up on you at all. Also, I dont get why D would complain about V being rated too high. If he wanted V to be a 30 speed, I'm sure V would have gladly obliged and beat him with a spot.
Word about the match spread like wildfire and people were laughing about it for days.
What are everyones thoughts on the 3-foul rule? Do you think D had the right to get that worked up over it? I think that no matter what happens on the table, each match should end with a handshake, wholehearted or not.
Last edited: