After listening to the interview, I think the contract was very fair. It just did not explicitly state that French was paying 100% of Dennis' traveling expenses, food, hotel, table time, pocket money, etc. If that was written on the contract, the contract would be very fair for a top 10 world level player. For anyone under a top 10 world level player, I think that same contract should state 65% goes to the backer, instead of 50%.
Why that was not written, is strange to me. But if it was done that way in their actual transactions, then it was a fair contract imo.
Contract; fair; did not state...What?
How can a contract that does not state how each party will act be considered fair?
One party woul be obligated to provide something, the other obligated to provide nothing.