I probably would have done something different. I wouldnt say this is a chicken shit move, but there are chicken shit plays. But I would not have done it in this case as the defense on his shot would be too easy.
It's a chicken-sh!t move, but not the way most think. Your move made him scared and confused, made HIM a chicken. It also made him sh!t himself on his shot, leaving you a shot to win with. That is exactly what you want to do. Put a move on him that will make him go brain-dead, and then do something stupid to give you the win.
Spot on!!!!!!!!!
Gotta love a Neil response.....Greenie for you
IMO, a smart play. He in turn should have shot the cue ball into the pocket, giving ball in hand back to you. If you respond in kind and he likewise, he eventually wins because you fouled three times before he did!
There is nothing wrong with shooting the other players balls. Sometimes you can adjust your plan depending who you are playing and that players ability. Im glad it worked for you but 9 times out of 10 playing a good player you will lose , I realize that the kick shot was a realitivily easy one but after making it he would have had to break open the 8 ball or had to hook you and depending where the cueball stopped it may have not been easy and a scratch was possible, By giving him ball in hand he could locked you up quite easy. Why do all his work for him? A clip on the 11 and leave the balls tight and cueball on the side rail you have to leave things in the other players hands but you hand no real choice. Your lucky it worked out for you but it could have been real bad unless your good at lagging 3 rails to play a nice safety back. its just my opinion but just cause it worked once doesnt make it the right play.
with ball in hand he missed the 8?? crying is a forgone conclusion![]()
With ball in hand it was extremely easy for him to put you in a much worse situation with the 8 ball blocking you. He should be thanking you for giving him ball in hand there.