who was it that made a cue similar to this dean cue?
runscott said:Oh you're right John - I NEVER look at anything objectively.
I "can't stand"? It "burns my ass"? lol - I don't CARE. My ass is a perfectly normal 98.6
"I can't stand"? John, you give yourself way too much credit - you are providing me with entertainment - nothing more. I'm a 'bigot'? lol
John, I don't care what I "get with you" - so far, I've gotten a whole of nothing.
The above I will give you - a lot of people had that reaction to Deano's customers being called 'suckers', but I also feel that Craig and others (myself included) had some valid points concerning our characterization of Deano's customers. You disagree - nothing wrong with that. But you did put words in people's mouths when you claimed that they were saying Deano's cues were bad. That wasn't the complaint and you know it - the complaint was his marketing and people buying into it with imo no good reason. Again, we disagree - that's what makes the world interesting
The difference is huge - Titlists are a known quantity with established market values, and those values are based on solid facts. I won't waste people's time trying to explain to you why Titlist collectors are different from Deano collectors (is there ALREADY such a thing?)
John, just as you took offense at Craig questioning the intelligence of the newbies who are jumping all over these Deano cues without a clue as to what they are, I also took offense at you - for jumping Craig without having a clue as to who he is.
As far as Craig's knowledge of cues, I would personally put up $1,000 on a set between you and Craig - Craig playing with a cue he built and you playing with one you built - DEAD EVEN. And yes, I've seen Craig play, and no, I haven't seen you play - I've only heard you talk.
mtorre14 said:ok, i just want to jump in here really quick and say that i to recieved my Deano Cue and played with it for about 6 hours today. the cue hits great, solid feel. and moves the cue ball around pretty easy. draw shots are easier, mostly because of the stiff shaft. this cue hits better then both my Dale Perry with a 314-2 shaft(radial pin, on the Dale), and my Meucci with a 314-2 shaft(5/16x18 pin). i just ask that people do not critize the cue until they have had a chance to play with it. anyone that lives california south bay area, that plays at Hardtimes(bellflower) or Mr. Lucky's(torrance) let me know and i'll let you try mine. then you can judge for yourself. thats all i wanted to say. thanks,
Manuel
JB Cases said:...then I guess I really am clueless.
poolplayer2093 said:who was it that made a cue similar to this dean cue?
manwon said:European cues maker around two hundred years ago, Brunswick from the 1890's until the 1960's. (wood screw was always an option for a custom). Harvey Martin also made wood screw cues on a limited basis, Hermon Rambo as part of Brunswick, Helmstetter / Adam cues starting in the 1970's, and any cue maker who has made 3-Cushion cues in the last hundred years with the exception of Schuler. Is the wood screw joint a good stable joint, yes it is, will it provide a solid hit certainly, is it a new concept, I do not think so!!!!!!!!!![]()
But why bash his marketing?He delivered a good product and the customers are happy,a good hitting cue by all accounts.I agree it was some strange selling tactics but he was new here and seemed alittle computer illiterate,he did get results though and all cues sold.I wonder if i could sell some of my unsellable stuff this way,lol.runscott said:Wow! Better than your Dale Perry OR your Meucci? C'mon - you're messing with us, right?
BTW Manuel - and I'll say this real loud because you missed it the first hundred times we said it - NO ONE IS CRITICIZING THE CUE - IT'S THE MARKETING WE'RE BASHING. get it?
Perry or Meucci. Sure sound like bashing to me.runscott said:Wow! Better than your Dale Perry OR your Meucci? C'mon - you're messing with us, right?
BTW Manuel - and I'll say this real loud because you missed it the first hundred times we said it - NO ONE IS CRITICIZING THE CUE - IT'S THE MARKETING WE'RE BASHING. get it?
JB Cases said:Put up the same thousand and I will let you pick any cue in my booth. Surely Craig's cues are better than any chinese cue made. I will be at Valley Forge with $1000 ready to play. I will even play with the $59 Sterling sneaky pete if that's the one you choose. I have no doubt that Craig can make a better cue than I can, I am not a cuemaker and own no equipment. However I do know that there are "sneaky petes" that are easily "worth" more than $200, do you disagree with that?
I responded first simply to Craig's words not to his experience or lack thereof.
First, how can you or ANYONE say that the people who bought Dean's cues are "newbies" or that they are inexperienced buyers? The truth is that very few newbies would shell out $300 bucks based on Dean's sales pitch on this board. Especially in the face of the response from the "established" crowd.
You jumped me for jumping on Craig's experience level and yet you make such a statement as to assume that all or most of Dean's customers are inexprienced "newbies" when in fact this has been shown to not be the case.
And Craig didn't just "question" he "labeled" the buyers as suckers, which by extension makes the seller a scammer. If that is right in the face of such positive reviews then I guess I really am clueless.
ribdoner said:I'm relieved cooler heads are prevailing and the stress level is subsiding.
With the talk of hitting nerves, dentists, Craig drilling John, China,etc., I want to ask John a direct question:
Are you a communist?
1) yes
2) no
If the answer is NO are you concerned that communists are benefiting as a result of your talent and success?
Thanks in advance, Adam
p.s. regardless of the answer I'll continue to respect John for his energy, tenacity,etc., and would look forward sharing bread and beer
runscott said:okay, I can go ...
JB Cases said:Come on man. That's like me asking you if you are a democrat, republican, libertarian, protestant, jewish, nazi, whatever.
People benefit from my labor. What I do provides money which enables people to continue to live.
I am proud that I can produce something where I can see the direct result of my labor is enriching other lives.
Why do people bring this up all the time?
Are all Americans individually responsible for the repressive actions of the US Goverment?
Asking me if I care about the communist government of China is the same as me asking you if you feel like a murderer for lives of the innocent Iraqi and Afghan civilians killed by American soldiers.
What this has to do with whether a person who buys a cue and posts a positive review of the purchase is a sucker or not?
You see, I stay on topic.
People who can't address the actual issue don't. They try and make everything personal.
The issue at hand is this.
A forum member posted a postive review of their Dean cue. Then another forum member denigrated that person's viewpoint and characterized them as a sucker in a backhanded way.
This very same criticizing member went on a rampage, for lack of a better term, denouncing what he calls cue pimps. He did this not because he himself was a victim of said "pimping" (how that even fits I don't know) but because he was indignant at the "immorality" of it.
And yet when this member, Craig, posts a very rude and blatant knock on someone's product and their customers with absolutely no experience with the product in question then it's all good?
And it's NOT okay if I find this to be a little hypocritical?
I could care less if Dean's cue is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I think the guy has a ton of balls to come on here and hype a cue to the stars the way he did. Talk about a tough crowd.
And he probably deserved the criticism BEFORE anyone actually received a cue. But NOW when people are getting their cues and being positive about them there is NO NEED to continue to be negative towards the cues themselves or the method of sales. Especially not the way that Craig did it.
If that viewpoint is offensive to you then so be it. Sometimes being abrasive is what is needed. Try making a cue without sandpaper.
manwon said:John a short time ago you accused me of back peddling, well John these were your words : And how long have you been making cues? I bet I have worked on more cues than you have. But now you say the following: I have no doubt that Craig can make a better cue than I can, I am not a cue maker and own no equipment.
John, you have lost touch, you do not even know what you are saying any longer, now who is showing their butt here!!!!!!!![]()
JB Cases said:So funny. Dude if I wanted to "make" a cue the I have access to the everything I need to do so. But even if I did then you would say it's no good because it was made in China. Or because it was made on Chinese equipment, or some other excuse. I don't need to prove to you that I can "make" a cue to know that you are wrong in your statement that no sneaky pete is worth more than $200.
I gave away my repair lathes years ago. You obviously have some sort of a repair shop or maybe even a full fledged shop.
So my comment was referring to Scott's "bet" about a cue you have made and one I have made. I don't currently make cues and have no plans to start ever. There are enough good cuemakers who excel at their craft to satisfy my needs.
What Scott was trying to say is that I can't personally build a cue that I can beat you with. He is right. Not without disrupting the factory to prove a point that doesn't need proving. I could however build a cue if I chose to. Whether I could beat you or not is unknown, but I like my chances. I would certainly bet $1000 on it.
Which is WHY I offered to use a Chinese pool cue. Any that we have for sale at the booth. Since you always like to put Chinese pool cues down then it should be no contest that you with your "superior" cue should easily beat me with my "inferior" one. No matter how much talent I have I will be severely handicapped by the Chinese cue while your talent will be greatly enhanced by the Craigomatic.
Will you let your friend bet $1000 on this?
ericdraven said:ok now it is getting good , and yeah he owns a cue shop . big guess there lol . i wanna watch this billiard game . where will it be held ??
JB Cases said:It will never get played Eric.
In 15 years of doing shows no internet bully who loves to put down my products online has ever shown up at a show to prove their assertions.
People love to toss out all kinds of nonsense but when it comes time to post they are nowhere to be found.
I take that back, they are found exactly where they started - wearing out their keyboard.
(and yes I know, y'all are gonna bring up Jimbo - that had nothing to do with the topic at hand, nor the quality of my products)
ericdraven said:its crack i tell ya!!! lol .well if shatner will not be enough then we need more ........
![]()
and if that wont work this will![]()
![]()
john do not sweat it i agree with you . the folks runnyscoot , apron h , are trolls who bash other cuemakers because they are friends and tag team ,manwin owns a cueshop and he is cahoots with em . i would not worry bout it but it is funny . my wife just looked at the thread and said " are these grown men " ???? ROFLMAO even thou she likes my pics she said i was agging it on lol but it is fun as hell here . wait i need a ....
roflmao![]()
oh no i got flamed but i got my flamebuster 2000 on
JB Cases said:Come on man. That's like me asking you if you are a democrat, republican, libertarian, protestant, jewish, nazi, whatever.
I have no problem telling you directly that I've supported both democratic and republican parties. My support was predicated on which better served my special interests. How bout you?
People benefit from my labor. What I do provides money which enables people to continue to live.
AND?????????????
I am proud that I can produce something where I can see the direct result of my labor is enriching other lives.
AND?????????????????
Why do people bring this up all the time?
I can't recall anyone else asking you if you were a communist.
Are all Americans individually responsible for the repressive actions of the US Goverment?
The vast majority, if not ALL, mourn the slaughter of innocent lives.
Asking me if I care about the communist government of China is the same as me asking you if you feel like a murderer for lives of the innocent Iraqi and Afghan civilians killed by American soldiers.
See above
What this has to do with whether a person who buys a cue and posts a positive review of the purchase is a sucker or not?
Your right, my question is off topic. How many threads have you taken liberties with for your interests?
You see, I stay on topic.
Tonight you have
People who can't address the actual issue don't. They try and make everything personal.
I have nothing to add or detract from the "issue." I havn't had the opportunity to play with the cue in question. I've known DEAN for many years and consider him a friend. When I play with the cue I may make my opinion public. My question with regards to whether your a communist has nothing to do with the cue or this thread.
The issue at hand is this.
A forum member posted a postive review of their Dean cue. Then another forum member denigrated that person's viewpoint and characterized them as a sucker in a backhanded way.
This very same criticizing member went on a rampage, for lack of a better term, denouncing what he calls cue pimps. He did this not because he himself was a victim of said "pimping" (how that even fits I don't know) but because he was indignant at the "immorality" of it.
And yet when this member, Craig, posts a very rude and blatant knock on someone's product and their customers with absolutely no experience with the product in question then it's all good?
And it's NOT okay if I find this to be a little hypocritical?
I could care less if Dean's cue is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I think the guy has a ton of balls to come on here and hype a cue to the stars the way he did. Talk about a tough crowd.
And he probably deserved the criticism BEFORE anyone actually received a cue. But NOW when people are getting their cues and being positive about them there is NO NEED to continue to be negative towards the cues themselves or the method of sales. Especially not the way that Craig did it.
If that viewpoint is offensive to you then so be it. Sometimes being abrasive is what is needed. Try making a cue without sandpaper.