Plenty of players post to support the APA.
True, but here the haters outnumber the supporters at least 10-1, plus the fact that most of the APA has never heard of AzBilliards (to their detriment, because there is a wealth of information available here).
The CEO of BCA posts to support his league , and posts regularly on several topics.
Terry , Larry , & Renee are nowhere to be seen. Because they don't care about your opinion - they're bigger than that.
No...They're former professional players, and like mosts pros, choose not to post here because too many people like you will bash them to death and drive them away. Thank goodness for the few that do post...like John Schmidt. I enjoy the fact that Mark Griffin posts here frequently. He's very good for pool, and his opinion is certainly one I personally value and respect. Oh, and just to be specific, Mark is the CEO of the BCAPL, not the BCA...two completely different organizations.
To the fellow who listed APAs 'sponsorship' of the WPBA as one of their expenses - guess what , it has corporate sponsors of it's own , plus a lucrative TV deal. WPBA is a cash cow.
A cash cow huh? Boy that would be news to the players...who have lost sponsorship dollars and tournament venues right and left, over the past few years (this year there are a whole 4 events planned). Somehow that doesn't sound much like a cash cow.
To the s/l 4 who's been playing APA 4 years and isn't sure people would recognize sandbagging if they saw it -yes , we would . It's real , and it happens every week. Unfortunately , a certain amount of "handicap management" is required under the APA system.
If you reread the thread, you'd see that it was someone else who suggested that the OP might not recognize sandbagging...not the APA 4 that originally posted.
The APA's response to this is "mark defensive , and no one can cheat the system". BirdShot !
Scored correctly by BOTH teams, defensive shots do help in reigning in the cheaters.
The equalizer doesn't really work- an s/l 3 is very seldom going to beat an
s/l 7 in the real world , so you simply have to play the lower skilled player over his head in regular session to keep his handicap down . The player may not even realize his captain is using him that way. "I just want you to get some experience actually playing against higher skilled players":wink:
And if a ball doesn't go in a hole when I shoot , 70% of the time that was
' handicap management , and , SURPRISE , it rolled to where you can't make it - but like Maxwell Smart , I only "missed it by that much"
You actually have one point correct. In most cases a 3 will not beat a 7...and that's how the system is supposed to work. There is always a chance, however slight...and it has happened. "Handicap management", or whatever you wish to call it, is nothing more than outight cheating. If you have to cheat to win...go with what you do best, I suppose (I know...it's okay because EVERYBODY does it, right?).
The biggest complaint against the APA is the Nationals - where is the money really going , cuz it ain't coming back in the prize pool . My team leaves in 10 days to compete for a top prize of $10,000 divided by 8 players $1200 dollars each- if we go all the way I'll lose more than that at the Cue Club
If it's as bad as you say, why are you going? You have your figures wrong, of course (big surprise). The 8-ball prize is $25K, divided 8 ways is $3k each...not bad. The 9-ball prize is $15K, divided 8 ways is about $2K each...still not bad. Of course that's just 1st Place (but I GUARANTEE you that those winners will be deleriously happy, with the $$$ and the win...after all they did just win a national championship, that can never be taken away). The APA pays all the way to last place. Name another league or tournament EVER that paid the whole field. You can't, because there aren't any.
They take it in , but they don't pay it out . . .
Maybe you should just take the $50 you'll get when you arrive (last place $$$), and go bet it on red. You'd probably have a better chance to win more, than playing in the tournament.
And all this is before I start on their out of control local league operators -
whom they have neither the desire nor the ability to rein in. I play simultaneously in two different APA regions 600 miles apart (only takes 4 matches per session to stay qualified) so I have a very clear understanding pf how much is on the local operator- and to answer someone else question , yes , in some areas 75% dissatifaction may be correct
Wow...you travel 600 miles to play in a league you HATE? Who's the unhappy idiot here? I'll take a bet on the 75% dissatisfaction rate...and we can get a factual survey done to decide the winner...as opposed to your 'official' predictions.
but APA's the only game in town , and the Local League operator owns the franchise, so essentially she (oops , identity hint slipped out) can do anything she wants. Stand up to oppose her at a captains meeting and your s/l suddenly goes up - and locally controlled bonus points aren't awarded - ad infinitum.
You obviously don't know what you're talking about here either. If LO's could raise skill levels simply because they didn't like people, they'd be out of biz pretty fast. Unbeknownst to you, APA Corporate can discipline LO's, and even revoke franchises for things you're supposing happen at will.
nuff sed