Drawman,
I think "dominated" is too strong a word. Showed strongly, had several great players, etc., but when I think of "dominated", heck, I think of command, eclipse, monopoloize or over shadow. I'll put Eddie Taylor, Truman Hogue, Gary Spaeth, Vernon Elliott, etc against the black bank specialists and I would also take Efren Reyes, Ronnie Allen, Jersey Red, Shannon Daulton, etc over black one pocket specialists. That is not to diminish the accomplishments of the great black players, but my point is that as far as I know, the very upper echelon of bank pool & one pocket is still filled with many great white players.
Although several very fine black players have done very well in the games we're discussing, black players AS A WHOLE have not dominated bank pool or one pocket.
I'm not trying to nit pit here or parse your very well written post, but I read every word when it comes to the history, pecking order and exceptional players of our great sport and I felt that "dominate" really may not fit with the rest of your post. But that is just my opinion and others may choose to disagree with me.
And for the record, personally, I think Leonard Rucker was the second greatest banker of all time, behind only Eddie Taylor. He would be the "favorite" over many white bankers, but on the other hand, I think there are more (in number) accomplished white bank and one pocket specialists over all than (in numbers) black players. And, that being the case, I don't think that blacks "dominate" those two disciplines.
I do appreciate your thoughts though, and I agree with the "mentoring" and "inspirational" aspects of your post.