dr_dave said:He might be dipping and flinching, but that doesn't explain the graph. For more info, see:
Regards,
Dave
Is this the link?
http://billiards.colostate.edu/technical_proofs/new/TP_A-9.pdf
How would you interpret my graph?
dr_dave said:He might be dipping and flinching, but that doesn't explain the graph. For more info, see:
Regards,
Dave
Pete said:Randy,
Why would that be bad "My cue does NOT touch my body at any time during the stroke, that would be bad."?
In Joe Davis'es book he shows the cue touching his tie to the point of wearing the threads on it out.
I shot for two year with it touching the side of my chest (I'm a big guy), because I didn't want my chest to get hit by the cue durring the stroke (I don't know if that makes sense, I'm a terrible writer)...
Thanks,
Pete
scottjen26 said:, but if I'm not feeling in line during a particular session if I go back to being a little more rigid and straight back/straight through I increase my pocketing percentage a little, and then sometimes get my confidence back or straighten out my alignment and loosen up again.
Scott
pooltchr said:If I'm reading this correctly, you are saying that you usually just play loose, but when you feel you are struggling, you force yourself to do what you already know has the potential of bringing you a 10% improvement in your game.
Why not PRACTICE what you know can make you a better player, to the point that it becomes a habit, and along the way, becomes your natural stroke. If you found a stroke that can give you that kind of improvement, why in the hell would you not want to use it all the time????????
Steve
"They don't know what they don't know".pooltchr said:Since you are obviously more experienced at this than I, I will defer to your expertise.
Please enlighten me.
Steve
The pump stroke I see is their practice stroke. On the last stroke, I see slow pull and smooth follow.scottjen26 said:Thanks Flex for the comments.
Steve, I hear you, believe me, KISS rules in most things. But the reality is very few pro players use a pendulum stroke on the break (normal break, not soft break), obviously sacrificing control and consistency for power. There are all sorts of crazy styles out there, although again I see where you are coming from.
But since you are a certified instructor, and study the game and have seen many students, can you or someone else here explain the pump action I described on the final stroke? As Flex verified, a lot of top players have it, but I haven't seen it described anywhere in an article, book, etc. I started doing it sort of unconsciously, didn't pay attention to it years ago when I played but I'm really studying my game these days. It seems to add some rhythm to my stroke, enables that "loose" feeling, and prevents some hesitancy or snatch/hit impulses, especially under tight conditions. And again, a lot of top players seem to do it, and some local top players have commented on it, so it must be reality. I know it doesn't technically follow the KISS principle - straight back and straight through would - but if everyone's doing it... Some sort of guarded secret or just an anomoly shared by many?
Thanks,
Scott
At the top of the 2nd page of TP A.9, I explain how to interpret the graphs. With your graph, the forward acceleration is clearly negative before impact. This means your cue is decelerating (i.e., slowing down) as it approaches the tip. This is not typical or generally recommended (see HSV B.40). Possible causes are not "finishing" the shot or having your grip hand too far forward.JohnnyP said:Is this the link?
http://billiards.colostate.edu/technical_proofs/new/TP_A-9.pdf
How would you interpret my graph?
RonV said:Johnny, you can`t get a very good follow thru unless you drop it...The only time it won`t drop is when you use back spin then it`s proper, becaise your tip will hit the table...You can not get a full extension unless you drop the elbow.Ask the pros. I have allready talk with a few of them and they agree...\
Ronv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdwHgXpxQqA&feature=relatedpooltchr said:You have made some interesting observations, but they lead me to a few questions...
How much follow thru is very good follow thru? If I have a 6 inch follow thru, and decide to make it 10 inches, will it give me a better stroke? Since the tip and the cue ball separate in 1/1000 of a second, how does a longer follow thru change the reaction of the balls? What is "full extention" and what is the benefit of it in my stroke? How much "follow thru" is necessary to draw the cue ball? Is it the same as you need for follow? If the tip doesn't hit the table when you finish your stroke, where does it end?
Thanks
Steve
pooltchr said:You have made some interesting observations, but they lead me to a few questions...
How much follow thru is very good follow thru? If I have a 6 inch follow thru, and decide to make it 10 inches, will it give me a better stroke? Since the tip and the cue ball separate in 1/1000 of a second, how does a longer follow thru change the reaction of the balls? What is "full extention" and what is the benefit of it in my stroke? How much "follow thru" is necessary to draw the cue ball? Is it the same as you need for follow? If the tip doesn't hit the table when you finish your stroke, where does it end?
Thanks
Steve