Although I respect the opinions posted here thus far, I think the primary issue here are aesthetics. I've been witness to weight, roundness and diameter measurements for several ball sets and I'm pretty sure others have done the same and posted results here. All of the brands mentioned are more accurate than anyone's game could notice. Although they all will wear, if this is for home use, you probably won't use them as much as a poolroom so they should have the same measurements for years and years.
That said, I found no technical differences between brands in my own personal experiences. I do think the colors for the Cyclops balls (specifically, the 7 and 15) are a little confusing. If your game isn't rotation, this isn't a problem. If it is, you'll have to learn to adjust to seeing a blue 7-ball. As well, the cue-ball appears to be slightly translucent which is not something I enjoy but again, I didn't miss because of it. It seemed to react normally.
If I owned my own table, I'd probably have multiple sets of balls. I like the idea of practicing with Cyclops if I know I'm going to be competing with them. The poolroom I go to has a set upon request, usually used for the exact same purpose. But, I don't think it would be my ball of choice. My first pick would be Aramith Tournament Edition. I think they're nice to look at and they're arguably the best balls on the market but I'm also certain I play enough that longevity would be an issue. I also think any poolroom looking to buy new balls should strongly consider Aramith Tournament Edition over everything else.
Unless Saluc or Simonis buys the Centennial brand from Brunswick, then the specifications and requirements for the Centennials are owned by Brunswick Centennial.
there's a resoundng enorsement...replace them every 18 months.It's been written and said...n I'll get a new set of Centennials as a back-up which is what I've done since 2002.....a brand new set every 18 months.
Derby uses them because Diamond is the importer. They suck but whatcha gonna do, not play? Just another adjustment.I think people get hung up on "best". I worry about what balls I will be using when playing in a tournament or for cash. The DCC and a major local room here (St. Louis) uses mostly Cyclops, so I got a set of those. I think I prefer aramith, but I don't really want to put myself at a disadvantage when I get in the grease.
kollegedave
Pool shoes are a good idea.
What kind of socks should I be wearing? I think I have the correct shoes, but my socks are making me miss to the left.
It was suggested that I wear 2 socks on my left foot because that side was low, but then my left shoe feels too tight...... :angry::thumbup:
I prefer Centennials[/B] for one simple reason...The numbers are not located within the stripe
I am also a big believer of using the cue ball that comes with the set so they all matched, so the blue circle w/the Centennials are my preferences, especially for 1-pocket.
Depends on what you define as the stripe! I've always thought that the white areas are two stripes that surround the solid color, rather than it being a single colored stripe on a white ball. Personally for just pure aiming I prefer the object balls to be as simple as possible so there are less visual distractions to draw the eye away from the aim point. (There used to be a company called Raschig who made a set of 9-ball balls with no numbers at all that are much prized today. Saluc purchased them and killed the design.)
Therefore on this basis the Super Pros are my favorite design. However some players like the extra visual components on the Centennials as giving a reference point to use when aiming, but on this basis other players can feel this is an unfair advantage, especially in 8-ball.
I had the same problem a few years ago and found out I was wearing two left socks![]()
Try using a left-handed cue... works wonders.
We have been using the Aramith Tournament sets for the Pro events and they are preferred by the top Pros. They seem to prefer the Pro Cup cue ball too.
Ray