"if you really believe this, you must be a follower and that is really ashame because I though you were much more than that."
Craig..did you really have to add this line in your post? You wonder why...there's alway drama in threads...what happen to respect for other views other than yours? If you really believe in integrity, respect and is a forward thinker with an open mind than please post what you preach. I think this would have been avoid, if you posted with respect for others.
Anyway, I guess in the end...the buyers will decide what is innovative and what will play better.....if the idea works...I'm sure we will all know about it.
I've seen and heard of some innovative cue constructions over the years of collecting cues that I'm going to test out for myself now. I now believe that selecting great wood is probably the most important factor in building a great playing cue and the secret is in knowing what is great wood. I'm sure construction methods used will be a factor but in my mind it's plays a minor role.
I'm new to cue building and have been testing out ideas on my own for about 2 years. I recently posted a question on whether using a phenolic tube to join the handle to the forearm was a good idea with no steel just glue (still not finish yet). I've asked if the void in the tubing would be an issue and received some great feedbacks. I'm sure this kind of idea was not new and it from an old 70's cue that I've seen broken at the joint. So I'm sure all these methods may have been tried years and years ago at one point or another but probably the buyer didn't care much for them. Still, I like to know for myself why this method doesn't work. Was thinking of doing what Craig has mentioned and thought to myself that it probably a method that few would do if any

but guess not.
So my point, what someone think is innovative may be in fact what Eric said. "If you don't fully understand your subject to begin with, then you have no basis or foundation to expand from."
While for other cuebuilders who is uninformed like myself who think that I've just came up with a great idea, I would argue that it's innovation. To understand innovation...it means you have to already know what been done before and know why it's innovative. In this case, the subject is how to make a better playing cue.
So in my case, I may think it's innovative...but a experienced cuebuilder may look at it as inexperienced because he already know the result. If this method of construction worked...we would all have bought cuetech type of playing cue. Predator in their new line, started using phenolic to help stabilize movement of the joint pin but I think Bill McDaniel has been doing this for years and they called it "Innovation". LOL!!
I think I understand Eric point on innovation and I think Craig has his point as well minus the other comments. You would have to at least understand what have been achieved before you claim it's innovation. Craig is probably arguing that you don't need to understand how it work to be innovative..this is true but only if it plays better otherwise it's just different. So I think you guys are just making arguement on different prespective.
Good cue building to all of you.
Respectfully,
Duc.