How did we not all end up with one of these in our stockings that Christmas??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhTymwn-_U8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhTymwn-_U8
I do the same thing. This is one pattern I use that gets a pretty even spread on the balls, assuming I don't $#!7 the bed on the break shot
![]()
I would rather have a giant mechanized apparatus mounted over the table that drops a Sardo-like rack of balls onto the spot. Kind of like bowling pins.
No question it's against the rules, I suspect most players don't realize it's a violation.
Certainly several people in this thread didn't realize it is.
I agree it does suck if Corey used it to help him win the early rounds,
only to have it disallowed later.
But I can't help feeling like there were 8 chances for people to be aware of the rule, and complain...
and all 8 people failed to do that. It's understandable why Corey would try it,
if nobody is going to call him on it.
I understand that what he's doing is somewhat illegal, by current rules. I don't feel it should be, but that's my opinion.
It's probably a bad rule because it's so hard to tell (or prove) that someone is doing it. How do you really know if something is random? For any given rack, it's pretty easy to look like you're just throwing the balls down in any order. And the opponent would have to keep track of the ball positions rack by rack to see the pattern, which could be hard if you don't know what to look for.
This comes under the "snooze you lose" rule. If you are not watching what your opponent is doing, you're just as much to blame.
I agree, but two points:
1. This particular rule has the additional problem of requiring that something be random, which is unprovable.
2. I don't like the norm in pool that you can cheat as long as your opponent doesn't see it. I wish the standard was to call fouls on yourself and don't be a cheater. I know that what you say is right, but I just don't like that it's right. :wink:
This whole thing is silly. If the guy figured out an order to put the balls in, that combined with a certain break, it's complete skill & cunning that causes him to win. Say what you will, but to call it "cheating" is ludicrous.
Putting aside that fact that true random doesn't exist (random number generators are not random) There is absolutely no way to "randomly" place 14 balls into a rack. Would you leave all solids in the front and all stripes in the back if they fell that way into the rack? Likely not. Most people have a sense of what looks even, and that's their given rack.
Justin,
What do YOU define as cheating? The BCAPL and WPA rule books have evolved over the years in an attempt to cover virtually every situation that might come up. Intentionally circumventing the rules is cheating plain and simple. Whether it's Corey or myself.
As far as NASCAR is concerned, every car must pass the mustard at inspection. If you go way too fast on a track where down force is required, someone is going to look closer. One thirty second inch in spoiler height is a dramatic change in drag and down force. The days of running out of fuel on the cool off lap and then driving away from victory circle are long gone! Only problem in my view is NASCAR won't take a win away from a driver. Only fining and suspending people.
Lyn
What an amazing coincidence, that is the world standardised placement for blackball also:
![]()
Please explain how you can know the rule and make this statement.
Forget the "nothing is truly random" nonsense, the rule is there to prevent a player from taking unfair advantage. We all know this and saying anything else is just a diversion.
Now, what would be complete skill and cunning would be if Corey worked and practiced to figure out the best speed/location to hit the rack/kitchen placement of the CB to get the results he wanted from a randomly racked stack. If he was that good at reading a rack and knowing what to do with it then I'd be the first to say more power to him.
But to figure out and use a particular pattern to get these results is simply a violation of the rules. The fact that professionals seem to allow each other to do this doesn't make it any less so, and in fact only makes it worse.
Check out the rules for American Rotation at americanbilliardclub.com
Regards,
Don Owen
I agree, but two points:
1. This particular rule has the additional problem of requiring that something be random, which is unprovable.
2. I don't like the norm in pool that you can cheat as long as your opponent doesn't see it. I wish the standard was to call fouls on yourself and don't be a cheater. I know that what you say is right, but I just don't like that it's right. :wink:
I think the rule against pattern racking is simply a bad rule. In sports, when something is darn near impossible to keep track of, and financially not worth hiring a judge for.....it's a rule that is begging to be stretched or circumnavigated.
Why not just get rid of the rule and say, "There. Now go figure out how to make it work for you. Get creative."
No 2 players really break the same. Some are comfortable breaking from certain areas or using certain speeds. It would allow players to tailor the break to THEIR game.
ran·dom [ran-duhm]
adjective
1.
proceeding, made, or occurring without definite aim, reason, or pattern
There is also a negative to this whole discussion. How about when I rack for you? What if I learned to rack so you were almost guaranteed NOT to make a ball on the break? Should I be rewarded for that as well? My guess is everybody rack the balls for eight ball the same way. Not necessarily the same numbers but the same pattern every rack. Our league used to call the English Black Ball rack the "J" rack. Everyone had to use it. If Corey (and others) can figure out how to use it better than me, more power to them!
Lyn