Last I checked, cameras didn't have blind spots, and straight lines were straight.
Perhaps you should check something more recent. Look up barrel distortion, perspective and pincushion distortion.
Thank you Kindly.
Last I checked, cameras didn't have blind spots, and straight lines were straight.
Here is a video with the measurements.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q78s5Hq88sA
Cliff notes in a haiku version please....thanks
Object balls can be curved.....
The curve is being figured out.....
The moon has no say.....
I must admit that I now believe that it might be possible to beat the new challenge with a near-perfect hit of a near-perfect shot on some tables with favorable conditions (with a little luck thrown in). I look forward to seeing what is possible, and I am happy to pay my part of the $200 for the best effort and $2000 if the challenge is beat.I hope you try the challenge with the markers in place when you shoot the shot. It sure looks like more than an inch of bend is possible from your estimates.
Cliff notes in a haiku version please....thanks
A bank can bend some.Cliff notes in a haiku version please....thanks
And, I agree with everything you said. I've mentioned that some of Dr. Dave's stuff is spot on and scientific proof i.e. his super slow motion camera work. The thing i was calling Dr. Dave on, goes back before your time on the forums.
Back in the mid 2000's, Dr. Dave burst on the scene with instructional articles and all kinds of pontifications on "how it should be done". Thing is, at the time, he was a rank beginner, a D player, and hardly in any position to teach things from an experts point of view, when he himself, hasn't mastered the basics yet. Now, do you have to be a pro, to teach? Of course not. But, at the other end, if you are a rank beginner, you're in no position to teach anything.
Eric
Cliff notes in a haiku version please....thanks
I made Florian Venom Kohler aware of this challenge. If anyone can do it he can.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk
Anybody that has a good "stroke" can do it.
It isn't "doing it" that is the problem.
The problem is satisfying the EGOS
It WON'T be DONE until the scientists say it is DONE...even if it is DONE.
Tell the truth. People with no character renege.
If Bob Jewett is a man of character he PAYS THE MAN.
And the same for Dr. Dave.
You're way off base. So if somebody very clearly says, "If you follow these very specific instructions reading ABC, you will earn a cash prize" they are obligated to pay someone who doesn't even come close to following ABC? Crazy!
There, fixed that for ya.
This whole thread reminds me of why the pool world is ridiculous and people get bent out of shape all the time over ridiculous stuff.
Especially novice players.
You have 2 C players. The stars align one day and one of them magically runs a 4 pack in 9 ball, and then goes right back to C speed once the stars dis-align again.
The other player has never run a 4 pack, and immediately, his ego gets hurt.
So now, 4 pack guy MUST be lying, cause if Cs can run 4 packs, SURELY non4pack would have been able to do it by now, and since he can't, 4pack is lying or must be rated wrong.
All because the guys ego got bruised and he can't do what the other guy did.
It's all about whether they themselves can do it or not. Not if it actually happened or if it's the truth.
And if they can't do it, ITS ALL LIES!
So here, the topic of curving balls comes up.
Bank champ says he will post a video, of what is COMMON knowledge amongst high end bank pool players. Lots of people know he is telling the truth.
Champ posts the video of a ball curving.
Non champs deny there is a curve.
Non champs can't reproduce the effect
Non champs claim that during the shot, a friggin mirage appeared on the table and that everyone is hallucinating.
Cameras fail, eyes deceive, people hallucinate.
Then the non champs DOUBLE DOWN and want MORE proof, even though they deny that the ball clearly curves.
Someone posts a better video.
Non champs want measurements as more proof.
Measurements are made.
Non champs want more videos of curve because curving slightly APPARENTLY ISNT ENOUGH.
ALL BECAUSE THEY WERE WRONG AND LACKED THE STROKE TO DO IT THEMSELVES.
SO RIDICULOUS!
Just admit you were wrong and that your strokes suck already and be done with it.
You're way off base. So if somebody very clearly says, "If you follow these very specific instructions reading ABC, you will earn a cash prize" they are obligated to pay someone who doesn't even come close to following ABC? Crazy!
The revised challenge will be this way also. But you are free to choose any track line you want. The best approach will be to first find the shot that you can bend the most and then lay down the track line exactly along that shot. Then beating the challenge will require a precise hit to send the ball into your chosen track. This should not be a problem for a decent shooter who has practiced the shot a lot. Even a not-so-good player should be able to get at least one good hit with a large-enough number of attempts. We will also have a simple, reliable, and convincing way to measure the effectiveness of the bend. That's the main reason for the constrained setup.The problem with the setup that was described is you would need to make tha ball fit their track line