No rack issues this time, when he lost to Putnam it was because he had no control of the table due to Putnam making a ball and getting shape on the 1 in that corner with the cue ball heading to the other side of the same end of the table. With Mike racking for him. When Putnam missed, he had no shots.
The finals was were the rolls evened out, and Putnam did miss 2 makable shots that he hit with spin which caused the misses. 2 shots at their level can mean a guy who controls the set for another 2-3-4 games per miss.
Hey, hey, my, my, let's not forget endurance and youth!
