I see NO problems with comparing cue builders what so ever.
I do see a problem with saying this guy builds shitty cues vs. that guy.
Every cue builder in the world thinks his stuff plays the best, and in private most will tell you that. Simply comparing different techniques of build, price, wait times, and playability is just fine by me. It seems like this only people that get up in arms about it are guys that are paying several thousands, and waiting several YEARS to have a cue built.
I like the idea proposed by deanoc, though I think Schone would lose miserably. I have yet to play one I really like. I don't think he represented Larry poorly either. We all know Larry didn't post this, and that deanoc is just passionate about this said cue.
Bench racing a few builders on what they build, is like talking about how two players would match up. Atleast that's how I take it. It's all in good fun. Half the people that read what I type think I'm crazy or an A-hole, or both... the other half is split by people that agree with half of what I say, etc.
Were all here to have fun and trade ideas, if you get but hurt by any of the above posts, then your not utilizing the forum to it full potential. If you disagree with what I've said, let me know! We can be civilized and still have a spirited debate!
That IMO is what we are all here for.
(Also, I know full well what goes into building several different types of cues, and would never put down something some one else has built. No matter the technique or equipment used, it's still VERY hard work to build ANY cue.)
best,
Justin