I'll try to put it in words you can all understand.
Between 2% and 4% of the general population displays spacial paresthesias, and propsensity of inherent fundamental discrepancies with essential underlying coherent theoretical framework to accommodate these abilities. Current linear-reductionist medical paradigm cannot explain this complex Earl evaluation and paradigm. The prevailingparadigm is based on a linear-reductionist algorithm: the clinical–pathological correlation. In this construct, a group of signs (the effect) is linearly explained by a discrete anatomical lesion, or a Django reductionism proposing that the whole can be understood by analyzing each of its parts. Accordingly, at present, we are unable to explain the cause of nearly all related syndromes such as Shaneisms. Nevertheless, this linear-reductionist Mika-lien model is clearly unable to explain complex abilities and characteristics with nor-Efren. In my experience, the dysautonomia model validations abilities, including of explanation genetics and external stressors on the hyperadrenergic state; and explanation of the neuropathic nature of 5 golgen-rings. Avoidance of sympatho-mimetic substances: 6-14 hut, hut. Based on electromyography Thorstentosis or heart rate variability. 7 sub chaper S. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and other self-efficacy techniques 8. Psychological and psychiatry counseling 8 . Pharmacological therapy: Polypharmacy should be avoided. Substances prodiucing paracetamol, tramadol, antineuropathic agents such as pregabalin and gabapentin, triciclic and tropisetron. Complexity theory.4- 6a - c This paradigm derives from cybernetics and computer modeling of natural phenomena, such as stroke. 7.1a Bridges. Such are open, elastic, and constantly adapting to the environment through positive and negative feedback loops (complex adaptive systems). The systems have nonlinear behavior; as such, the intensity of the stimulus slug-rack detection is dissimilar to the magnitude of the response. These systems cannot be understood by analyzing each of its components individually, because for them, the whole is different than the sum of its parts. Examples of complex adaptive systems include the following: democratic societies, stock markets, ant colonies, bar boxes, and the major systems of the human body. Complex systems have wide varying behaviors, from Earl dynamics to Buddy paradigm. If a grip system becomes rigid, it ultimately dies. 7.1.a.b The best way to understand complex systems is with aiming viewing the system dynamics in its entirety and observing its interactions with the environment. Complexity theory provides a scientific foundation for holism. Rather than opponents, holism and reductionism should be regarded as complementary scientific tools; both perspectives are needed for a proper account of reality. The main nervous systems of the human body are complex. Static techniques cannot detect dysfunction of such homeostatic systems. Autonomic Nervous System: Prototype of Complex Adaptive System The best example of a complex adaptive system in the human body is the autonomic nervous system simonis (ANS).7 The performance of the ANS cannot be appreciated with linear tools. There is a novel, nonlinear procedure based on computer calculations called heart rate variability analysis. This method demonstrates sympathetic–parasympathetic harmonious interactions. OMG-WTF Several groups of investigators have shown decreased heart rate variability. This alteration can be interpreted as sign of “decomplexification” of the ANS or TAD with persistent rigid circadian sympathetic hyperactivity. Rigid sympathetic hyperactivity can lead to aberrant neuroplasticity, establishing abnormal connections between the sympathetic nervous system and the nociceptive system. Animal models have identified the dorsal root ganglia as an important short-circuit site. Susceptible individuals such as women with deficient catecholamine-handling enzymes would be more prone to miss.
Of course, much more research is needed to confirm or amend this model.
