Does Streaming of Regional Events Keep People From Supporting the Billiard Rooms ?
Does Local/Regional Event Streaming Keep People From Supporting the Billiard Rooms ?
There seems to be a 2-way argument for event streaming.
Argument 1. It is good for pool.
Maybe because it gets some additional sponsors involved and people far away from the event in question can watch the event and see the players.
Also it is seen as good for the players as it gives them and there sponsors more visibility.
Argument 2. It is NOT good for pool.
Possibly because it keeps people at home and they are not supporting the event by being there and eating, drinking, playing pool and supporting the venue in a whole. (note: I have seen for an absolute fact that some local/regional players do not come back to events on the final day and/or local players friends and family to not come to the venues because they can simply watch at home instead of being at and supporting the venue.)
Also, fans of the sport are sitting at home watching far away events instead of supporting a local event or pool room right in there own back yard.
I have tried to see both sides of the argument. I have spectated at events, I have also watched streamed events. I have also participated in the streaming of events and I have also chosen to not participate in the streaming of events. After trying out all sides of this argument I subscribe to the side that believes that streaming of local/ regional events is NOT good for pool but streaming of larger international events is good for pool. That is just my personal opinion, what's yours ?
I should also note that I also believe that streaming of local/regional events takes away possible sponsorship opportunities from the Payers, Promoters and Venues alike. But again, there are 2 sides to this argument to.
Does Local/Regional Event Streaming Keep People From Supporting the Billiard Rooms ?
There seems to be a 2-way argument for event streaming.
Argument 1. It is good for pool.
Maybe because it gets some additional sponsors involved and people far away from the event in question can watch the event and see the players.
Also it is seen as good for the players as it gives them and there sponsors more visibility.
Argument 2. It is NOT good for pool.
Possibly because it keeps people at home and they are not supporting the event by being there and eating, drinking, playing pool and supporting the venue in a whole. (note: I have seen for an absolute fact that some local/regional players do not come back to events on the final day and/or local players friends and family to not come to the venues because they can simply watch at home instead of being at and supporting the venue.)
Also, fans of the sport are sitting at home watching far away events instead of supporting a local event or pool room right in there own back yard.
I have tried to see both sides of the argument. I have spectated at events, I have also watched streamed events. I have also participated in the streaming of events and I have also chosen to not participate in the streaming of events. After trying out all sides of this argument I subscribe to the side that believes that streaming of local/ regional events is NOT good for pool but streaming of larger international events is good for pool. That is just my personal opinion, what's yours ?
I should also note that I also believe that streaming of local/regional events takes away possible sponsorship opportunities from the Payers, Promoters and Venues alike. But again, there are 2 sides to this argument to.
Last edited: