Dumping - caught

Screenshot 2026-05-19 232717.png


Screenshot 2026-05-19 232737.png
 
I agree. To be Captain Obvious: I hate this, and take offense. It’s a shame but these guys will wear this banner for quite a while to come. I’m glad of it.
Will Prout
I seem to recall a televised tournament way back out west that many thot would be the 'big break' our sport needed to become mainstream with sponsorship dollars, TV time, etc... all went down the shoot when dumping was discovered.
The game hasn't recovered yet. Still carries the stigma from that one.
 
Those are widely accepted and acceptable strategies to try to defeat an opponent in a competitive endeavor that are within rules of the game that have been accepted by both sides. If you think they in any way comparable to colluding to fix the outcome of a competition then you have zero moral compass.
so if a kid gets a new 100 dollar cue for christmas from his parents so he can start playing pool and his grandmother gives him 100 dollars cash, it's not a moral issue for a me as 700 fargo to convince him how well he plays and that he and I play about the same speed and take his cue and his 100?
 
so if a kid gets a new 100 dollar cue for christmas from his parents so he can start playing pool and his grandmother gives him 100 dollars cash, it's not a moral issue for a me as 700 fargo to convince him how well he plays and that he and I play about the same speed and take his cue and his 100?

That would be the cheapest lesson on when not to put money in with the wrong crowd. How many young men in college bars are having this exact same scenario play out every weekend?
 
its a moral issue for some and doesn't need to be.

when in a gambling game you need to do that. do you think in a poker hand you need to tell your opponent that you have a great hand and he should'nt call your bet.

or the pitcher in a baseball game shouldn't pretend he is throwing a fastball and make it a curve.
or in foot ball do they need to let the other team know where they are passing to.
ok, but all these examples are behavior in the middle of a game so I'm having trouble making the connection. It's early, I'm old, it's probably me.
 
That would be the cheapest lesson on when not to put money in with the wrong crowd. How many young men in college bars are having this exact same scenario play out every weekend?
Ok, so I guess this thing is a good lesson too, don't bet on someone elses action.
 
These guys broke more than one federal law including wire fraud, conspiracy and possibly travel act. Getting caught and giving back the money does not make it OK. This will never get better unless people there are consequences.
 
its a moral issue for some and doesn't need to be.

when in a gambling game you need to do that. do you think in a poker hand you need to tell your opponent that you have a great hand and he should'nt call your bet.

or the pitcher in a baseball game shouldn't pretend he is throwing a fastball and make it a curve.
or in foot ball do they need to let the other team know where they are passing to.
you expect in poker that people are trying to trick you into what hand they have. Same with a baseball pitcher. In this you’re not expecting two players to collude together so that the winner is predetermined. They aren’t even remotely the same.
 
I always wondered how these 2 were traveling the country playing for extremely high amounts night after night. Well apparently they weren't. Or by chopping up people's money, it allowed him to play the easier opponents. Either way, super shitty thing to do.
 
As deplorable and 100% unforgiveable as this is, the perpetrator(s) can make a positive of this.

Double crosses, whether they be at the pool table, in business, or in other areas of life can have dire consequences. One of the problems is that one never knows exactly who the person(s) swindled really are. Perhaps some of them are the type that can forgive and turn the other cheek, but perhaps some of them are relatives of a mobster. Perhaps they are carrying a gun. Who knows?

While I do not have first-hand knowledge of a dumper at the pool table being killed in retribution, I was present when a) a presumed dumper was stabbed but only wounded, and b) a presumed dumper returned to his car only to find all four of his tires slashed and his windshield smashed (perhaps with a baseball bat or something similar).

Anyone in on a dump is taking a chance, and the day might possibly come when something tragic comes of it. Obviously, one hopes not.

If the perpetrator(s) learn a lesson here, and discontinue this practice, they can make a positive of this. Anyone who takes the view that "dumping has always been around in pool so this is no big deal" needs to reconsider.

In the end, getting caught might prove a positive here for the participants in this swindle. We can only hope that remedial behavior is coming.
 
...While I do not have first-hand knowledge of a dumper at the pool table being killed in retribution, I was present when a) a presumed dumper was stabbed but only wounded, and b) a presumed dumper returned to his car only to find all four of his tires slashed and his windshield smashed (perhaps with a baseball bat or something similar).
People have been killed for a lot less ca$h
 
  • Like
Reactions: sjm
I used to be very naive back in the day. Now I don't trust anyone but myself. As far as I'm concerned all matchups of this sort are rigged, until proven otherwise. It's still despicable and deserving of contempt, though.
 
They reimbursed only because they got caught. No mercy, or forgiveness for what they did unless they do prison time.
I know guys that if they got cheated by this, someone would be dead or hospitalized.
I know I'm going to sound ignorant here, but while there is clearly foul play here, there does not appear to be a crime in play.

My understanding is that debts that arise from gambling matches are not legally enforceable in the first place.
 
I know I'm going to sound ignorant here, but while there is clearly foul play here, there does not appear to be a crime in play.

My understanding is that debts that arise from gambling matches are not legally enforceable in the first place.
Agreed. Nobody is heading for the prosecutor's office with this evidence.

From a legal perspective, for good or for bad, there will be no "there" there.
 
Back
Top