The professor would indeed be extremely disappointed... RH is probably rolling in his grave over this one. He was all about integrity. Sad day.I'm sure the professor is more than disappointed.
I seem to recall a televised tournament way back out west that many thot would be the 'big break' our sport needed to become mainstream with sponsorship dollars, TV time, etc... all went down the shoot when dumping was discovered.I agree. To be Captain Obvious: I hate this, and take offense. It’s a shame but these guys will wear this banner for quite a while to come. I’m glad of it.
Will Prout
so if a kid gets a new 100 dollar cue for christmas from his parents so he can start playing pool and his grandmother gives him 100 dollars cash, it's not a moral issue for a me as 700 fargo to convince him how well he plays and that he and I play about the same speed and take his cue and his 100?Those are widely accepted and acceptable strategies to try to defeat an opponent in a competitive endeavor that are within rules of the game that have been accepted by both sides. If you think they in any way comparable to colluding to fix the outcome of a competition then you have zero moral compass.
so if a kid gets a new 100 dollar cue for christmas from his parents so he can start playing pool and his grandmother gives him 100 dollars cash, it's not a moral issue for a me as 700 fargo to convince him how well he plays and that he and I play about the same speed and take his cue and his 100?
ok, but all these examples are behavior in the middle of a game so I'm having trouble making the connection. It's early, I'm old, it's probably me.its a moral issue for some and doesn't need to be.
when in a gambling game you need to do that. do you think in a poker hand you need to tell your opponent that you have a great hand and he should'nt call your bet.
or the pitcher in a baseball game shouldn't pretend he is throwing a fastball and make it a curve.
or in foot ball do they need to let the other team know where they are passing to.
Ok, so I guess this thing is a good lesson too, don't bet on someone elses action.That would be the cheapest lesson on when not to put money in with the wrong crowd. How many young men in college bars are having this exact same scenario play out every weekend?
you expect in poker that people are trying to trick you into what hand they have. Same with a baseball pitcher. In this you’re not expecting two players to collude together so that the winner is predetermined. They aren’t even remotely the same.its a moral issue for some and doesn't need to be.
when in a gambling game you need to do that. do you think in a poker hand you need to tell your opponent that you have a great hand and he should'nt call your bet.
or the pitcher in a baseball game shouldn't pretend he is throwing a fastball and make it a curve.
or in foot ball do they need to let the other team know where they are passing to.
People have been killed for a lot less ca$h...While I do not have first-hand knowledge of a dumper at the pool table being killed in retribution, I was present when a) a presumed dumper was stabbed but only wounded, and b) a presumed dumper returned to his car only to find all four of his tires slashed and his windshield smashed (perhaps with a baseball bat or something similar).
They reimbursed only because they got caught. No mercy, or forgiveness for what they did unless they do prison time.
I know, but I noted that it has never happened when I was present.People have been killed for a lot less ca$h
I know I'm going to sound ignorant here, but while there is clearly foul play here, there does not appear to be a crime in play.They reimbursed only because they got caught. No mercy, or forgiveness for what they did unless they do prison time.
I know guys that if they got cheated by this, someone would be dead or hospitalized.
Agreed. Nobody is heading for the prosecutor's office with this evidence.I know I'm going to sound ignorant here, but while there is clearly foul play here, there does not appear to be a crime in play.
My understanding is that debts that arise from gambling matches are not legally enforceable in the first place.
You can't legislate behavior and punitive measures do not provide societal inspiration!This will never get better unless people there are consequences.