Did you really see people vape rather than smoke in the places where smoking was permitted? I never saw that. In my experience, when smoking was permitted all pool halls allowed it and all smokers just smoked cigarettes. Then when most (? I think) states banned it, the pool halls were required to ban it. I see you're in New England - do any states there permit smoking in enclosed public places?
Oops... I'm actually not in New England anymore. In my state it's at the room owner's discretion.
No city- or state-wide ban.
I didn't mean to imply anyone vaped when they had the option to smoke.
You're right, they usually will smoke if given the choice.
So what I'm saying is... since the pool room banned smoking, but allows vaping,
the smokers are at least a little happy. And being a little happy means they don't
complain at the room owner and ask him to undo the smoking ban.
Many of them have taken up vaping only for places where cigarettes are banned.
But a few of them have switched to vaping entirely.
Whether or not that helps them quit, depends.
You can buy each flavor in a variety of nicotine strengths... usually 5 different levels.
So it's entirely possible that some people can quit by starting at a medium strength,
and gradually stepping down to lower levels. One of the levels is 0 nicotine,
so eventually you can quit cold turkey.
The damaging, cancer-causing stuff in cigarettes is mostly a by-product of burning
tobacco and some of the chemical additives that companies add to enhance flavor.
The nicotine is not entirely harmless either, but thankfully when you smoke
you're not ingesting 100% of it. Just a fraction of it.
From what I've read (sounds unbelievable) the amount of nicotine in 2-3 cigarettes would kill you
if you got 100% it in your system. For example if you ate the thing whole.
But the nicotine is mostly just added to keep you addicted, and is not the cause of cancers
associated with smoking.
I'm no expert but from what I've read, it seems pretty clear that vaping is much safer than smoking.