So it should be easily broken now that the incentive is there, is that your prediction?You were one of the people who was wrong then. Mosconi's record stood so long solely because it wasn't worth the effort to break, but at any point in time, and now more so than ever, dozens of players had the ability to break it, they just didn't have the motivation to break it.
You are right in the sense that it is probably closer to the typical or average table out there than it is to a tight diamond, but wrong in the sense of it not being ridiculous. While there are lots of easy tables out there, this table is on the extreme end of the spectrum about as easy as a table can possible get so there aren't many tables out there at all that are easier.Anyone who thinks this table is ridiculous is completely out of touch with how pool is generally played. This is a normal table, not a tight Diamond.
If it is closer to the typical table than a Diamond, then how in the hell can it be described as ridiculous? This is pool as it was played for generations.You are right in the sense that it is probably closer to the typical or average table out there than it is to a tight diamond, but wrong in the sense of it not being ridiculous. While there are lots of easy tables out there, this table is on the extreme end of the spectrum about as easy as a table can possible get so there aren't many tables out there at all that are easier.
I'm out of touch with how pool is generally played? I've been playing for 58 years. All I said was, and I was very clear, it LOOKS very generous- I said that I don't know for sure since I have not played on it - period!! It was an observation- no need to say what you said.Anyone who thinks this table is ridiculous is completely out of touch with how pool is generally played. In the grand scheme of things, this is a normal table. A tight Diamond is the aberration.
After ripping through this rack Jayson came up a couple inches short and has his work cut out for him in rack 21.
He BARELY made it but he made it and here we go...
As I said earlier, if Warren buffet said he would pay a million dollars to every single person who could run 627 or more balls (on equipment like Mosconi did his 526, or like Schmidt did his 626, or like the equipment in use for this challenge) by January 16, 2023 (one year from today), there would be dozens of players who would accomplish it including a number of players from other billiard disciplines on other table types such as snooker players and Chinese 8 ball players.So it should be easily broken now that the incentive is there, is that your prediction?
I think it would be fairer just to say it’s a generous table for top professional players to be playing on.I'm out of touch with how pool is generally played? I've been playing for 58 years. All I said was, and I was very clear, it LOOKS very generous- I said that I don't know for sure since I have not played on it - period!! It was an opinion- no need to say what you said.
Well then maybe I shouldn't have used the term ridiculous, but what was the table John played on that was a question.If it is closer to the typical table than a Diamond, then how in the hell can it be described as ridiculous? This is pool as it was played for generations.
Shaw is now at 300 and looking good after a couple sketchy moments in this rack.