I had a fun idea to slowly get rid of sandbaggers. Setup a few tournaments divided by ratings. Take the top 4 finishers and add 50 to their rating at the end of it as part of their "prize". If you are really at your rating, play another hour a week to play up to your new skill, if you are sandbagging, well now you are not.
Sounds fun.
I trust FargoRate has some not-so-secret plans in place to address sandbagging. Players usually dump when it means nothing. Most games mean something. So it’s hard for that to drop a robust average meaningfully.
And then when it might affect a player rating, I assume FargoRate has the opportunity to incorporate tools to detect and track oddball results. Perhaps the player gets flagged in some way on a watch list for tournament directors. Perhaps simply the outlier results have less weighting in affecting your average.
I mean, if SVB lost a 9-ball race to 21 against me, FargoRate probably has access to statistical algorithms that could identify those results as suspect and act accordingly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk