Mandatory push after the break. The break will still be an advantage, but everyone would have a fighting chance and it would avoid matches like this one.The Winner Break format is a “thing” of the past. IMHO. Acceptable, maybe, 20 years ago. With today’s equipment, it’s obsolete If you want a fair competition and Not an Excellent Exhibition. When I go to a Top Tier Tournament, I pay to see Good Competition and not to see Good Exhibition.
This is not the first time it happened. Maybe this Winner Break format will change now that the “victim “ was Captain America.
Filler vs Shane, 10 ball, race to 100. When is it going to happen? I'll buy it.
Holy cow that's dominant. Not sure we've ever seen dominance like that.Filler has been shooting pretty good all week. He has 4 -> 9-0 matches. 2 -> 9-1 matches. And 3 9->2 matches. So 9 of his 14 matches gave up 8 games total…
-td
Shane got to his current dominant position because of winner breaking, now all of the sudden the shoe is on the other foot and folks are complaining, lol.The Winner Break format is a “thing” of the past. IMHO. Acceptable, maybe, 20 years ago. With today’s equipment, it’s obsolete If you want a fair competition and Not an Excellent Exhibition. When I go to a Top Tier Tournament, I pay to see Good Competition and not to see Good Exhibition.
This is not the first time it happened. Maybe this Winner Break format will change now that the “victim “ was Captain America.
I can’t say for sure, but if you look at old Accu Stats catalogs, I recall there were instances of Sigel maintaining a ~.900 TPA for an entire tournament in the 80s. Or I could be remembering this totally wrong.Holy cow that's dominant. Not sure we've ever seen dominance like that.
SVB would do it if it was a race to 120, and he’d wear out Filler just like he did Gorst. Josh is not wired like Shane when it comes to a super long race.Why has it not happened yet?
I watched em play Pag 9 ball where he won 9-2, noticed the wing ball go straight in.Filler didn't miss a ball against Mickey either.
You just like a Good Exhibition and that is ok. I prefer a Good Competition. If you are a competitor you want an opportunity to compete something that you are unable to do sitting on a chair.Well, alternating breaks is boring, in my opinion. I love to see a really good 6-8 pack. I just think it is so awesome. And, I think that Josh Filler is the most exciting player in pool to watch.
Maybe bring back the wooden racks though, and have a Ref rack the balls. I believe that would make it much more difficult to string racks together, like they do.
I saw that too....I watched em play Pag 9 ball where he won 9-2, noticed the wing ball go straight in.
You just like a Good Exhibition and that is ok. I prefer a Good Competition. If you are a competitor you want an opportunity to compete something that you are unable to do sitting on a chair.
1 person almost did it, stop with the end of the world everybody is running out the set nonsense.When you are playing someone for money, do you play alternating breaks, or do you play winner breaks?
And, would it matter if you were playing them by the game, or doing a race? I bet it would still be Winner breaks.
I guess it makes sense that for 800 and above Fargo players, they should be Alternating breaks, if it is a short race. Because players in that skill level, are very capable of breaking and running out the entire set.