I think he's drunk. He quotes himself then responds.You have quite an imagination. This is not quite how it goes. You should probably take some time and play under these rules.
Quotes the same post twice and argues some more .
I think he's drunk. He quotes himself then responds.You have quite an imagination. This is not quite how it goes. You should probably take some time and play under these rules.
I have, and I've been playing pool since 1967, so I'm not new to the game.You have quite an imagination. This is not quite how it goes. You should probably take some time and play under these rules.
Well, have you tried it with my rules, or just to closed minded and don't even care to?You have quite an imagination. This is not quite how it goes. You should probably take some time and play under these rules.
Who's arguing? Have you even tried the modified break in 9B yet, or just complain because its better that way!!I think he's drunk. He quotes himself then responds.
Quotes the same post twice and argues some more .
My prediction would be: not well. Depends a bit on the table and the break format. Winner breaks and non-gaffy table, an 800 fargo will probably string 3-4 racks and be a threat to run 5-6 as well, any time he comes to the table with a makeable shot. He'd likely adjust his game a bit, to make sure he doesn't leave you anything. Remember that he is about a 50% to run out from a hooked position.I've always wanted to try ball in hand after any miss.
I wonder how that would work for me as a handicap against an 800+ Fargo.
Not that it would even matter tou, because you'll never be good enough to play at a level high enough to get into a sponsored event, you're an amateur at best.Well, have you tried it with my rules, or just to closed minded and don't even care to?
Can't play leave you nothing if its ball in hand after every missMy prediction would be: not well. Depends a bit on the table and the break format. Winner breaks and non-gaffy table, an 800 fargo will probably string 3-4 racks and be a threat to run 5-6 as well, any time he comes to the table with a good shot. He'd likely adjust his game a bit, to make sure he doesn't leave you anything. Remember that he is about a 50% to run out from a hooked position.
I don't really like your chances unless you are 700+ yourself.
Safeties not allowed? I thought he meant call safe for the pro.Can't play leave you nothing if its ball in hand after every miss![]()
In that case he has a good chance if he's a 700 or close to it, I'd think.Not if its ball in hand after every miss!!
I have some experience at promoting and running a few 10B events with ball in hand after every miss, as well as multiple wins in the same rack. Everytime the 10B was made out of turn, NOT being last, it counted as a wins, and spotted back up, and the player continued shooting until the rack was finished, or missed pocketing a ball.Safeties not allowed? I thought he meant call safe for the pro.
Yes. I answered this question in a previous post.Well, have you tried it with my rules, or just to closed minded and don't even care to?
Me too.I've always wondered what insanity posting would be like.
As are your's it's simply a gaff to the game , play the game as it is , no one changes chess or checkers last time I checked. You do make great glue I'm toldHave ANY of you tried racking and breaking as I posted in my first post, or are all these comments just opinions again without facts???
Then why isn't 9B played the way we played it 40 years ago, isn't it the same game played today?As are your's it's simply a gaff to the game , play the game as it is , no one changes chess or checkers last time I checked. You do make great glue I'm told
Is it beyond your ability to stick to the topic, if so, then how about keeping your off topic comments to yourself, IF you can that is!!I've always wondered what insanity posting would be like.
Last time I checked, chess and checkers were board games, and have nothing to do with pool. Neutralizing the break makes it a gaff game? Why is that, because it puts the players on a equal playing field after the break, so they have to show their skills at pocketing balls without the help of a pattern layout break!!???As are your's it's simply a gaff to the game , play the game as it is , no one changes chess or checkers last time I checked. You do make great glue I'm told
What made you think it was miserable then?Yes. I answered this question in a previous post.
Here's what I don't like about sticking your opponent so bad in a safe that there's no way out. Player shoots, makes the best attempt to make a legal shot, but fouls anyway, incoming player gets ball in hand, runs out!! What this rule change does, is give that SAME player a fighting chance to get OUT of that safety play by pushing out to a position in which they have at least a shot to make a ball, instead of just selling out.
This creates drama now in the game because the opponent is now faced with the decision of do I TAKE the shot, or do I take the RISK of giving the shot back to my opponent and HOPE he DON'T make a ball, because if he does, it might cost me the game!! But if I TAKE the shot and miss, THAT might cost me the game too! OH BOY, what do I do now???? Better hurry up and decide though, shot clock is counting down!!!