A similar format has been used over the last few years in televised English pool tournaments. It appears to have been pretty successful with not even a suspicion of a complaint from any of the players. That was 8 ball though and alternate break. I'm all for new formats and also for "levelling the playing field" in all but the biggest tournaments - tournaments are about who is the best on the day, not who has the stamina to get in the zone in a race to 120. Those who want to see the "best" player win every time are, in my opinion, missing the point of tournaments.
But, winner breaks in a rotation (early ball) game, race to 4 at the pro level At any elite level? Really?
I agree, the races to 100 or 120, or even 150 is for a different kind of viewer, and is BEST viewed through a $5.99 VOD streaming platform, then the viewers have the choice of how much, how long, what time, and what day they want to watch those matches.
Pool has NEVER had a Pro division of players representing the top 200 players in the world, playing each other exclusively, in ALL the different popular games. Unlike any other sports, pool has the ability to identify several different world champions, in many different games.
But this can't be done with players that can simply cross the line and play with the Pros because they can afford the entry fee to play.
If it takes a Fargo rate of 775 or higher to earn a spot on that list of Pros, then at that very moment all the questions of "What does it take to become a PRO" and that will force players to support pool rooms and events all around the world, in the players quest to raise their Fargo rate to the pro level, which wouldn't be a BAD thing for pool rooms, would it?