I normally find myself agreeing with you poolpro, but on this I have to disagree.
poolpro said:
The way I am seeing it. Everyone on here (myself included) were getting bent out of shape because it was felt that AZB was doing nothing to help protect its members from shady scammers.
I commend them for doing something, but just because you are doing something doesn't necessarily mean it's the right thing, or that you are going about it the right way. And since you mentioned it, it doesn't even really address the issue that everybody was so bent out of shape over to begin with, which was that the scammers were allowed to stay on AzB. Nothing has changed there.
poolpro said:
Yes AZB gave a bit of priority to a long standing, respected memeber. In this case I completely agree, otherwise what would be the point?
The point would be to make the members aware that a type of sevice that can protect them exists, provide them with some available options, and let them choose who to use. Using your logic, AzB should also give sticky's to the members that it feels are the best cue sellers, because that would also help to protect it's members. Also for the best case sellers. And for the best accessory sellers. And for the best cue repair persons.
poolpro said:
1 Azb is not responsible for ( oe getting paid for) any cue sales or escrow service)
If they are not making money from it and have no responsibility for it, then they shouldn't be providing their exclusive recommendation, and exclusive free advertising. And think about this, what is going to happen the first time somebody is unhappy with the service they received from the AzB recommended service? It's going to come back at AzB, that's what, and rightly so to an extent if you think about it.
poolpro said:
2 You are aware that these services ARE offered ( by more than 1 member)
Some members are not aware that these services exist at all, and some of the ones that know they exist don't have a clue who is available to provide them. What would be wrong with having a sticky that links to the members that provide these services, and let people choose for themselves? That still helps the members by providing information they can use to protect themselves, but it removes the unfair advantage or favoritism given to a particular service.
poolpro said:
3 if you choose not to use them, it is your responsibility
Exactly. With a sticky that links to the escrow providers that want to be listed, people will be able to choose for themselves who
they feel offers the best expertise, experience, and reputation, or they could still choose not to use anyone at all. AzB is completely off the hook because if a person is not satisfied with the escrow service for whatever reason, they made the decision for themselves, and no blame could go towards AzB like it can when they are officially recommending and pushing a particular service.
poolpro said:
Realize that EVERYONE on here who is complaining is fully aware that there is more that 1 member offering this service. Who you choose is up to you.
Then why not just have a sticky that just links to the providers, and just let the people choose for themselves? It provides all the benefits, without the drawbacks. The threads from the long time reputable members that are offering escrow services are going to be filled with people vouching for them anyway, so there isn't a need for the website to make an official recommendation or to give exclusive free advertising to only one person. A newer member's escrow thread wouldn't even have anything in it until they start to prove themselves.
Something else to consider... AzB's main reason for not wanting to get involved in the bad deals on here (thefts, scams, frauds, etc) is because
they don't feel it's their place to make judgements about the business practices. If they don't feel it's their place there (even when it's often clear cut and obvious), then how on earth do they feel like it's their place to turn around and make the very same type judgements by recommending someone as the best provider of a particular service (and giving exclusive perks), or by making judgements that the service offered by one person is better than the service offered by another person?