I am entirely speculating but when I connect the dots, here's what I figure happened.
Ernie obviously violated the ivory ban.......the Federal version.......and he sold these
two guys sections of cues that were already underway or nearing completion.....or
basically any cue that he could not complete and finish before July 1, 2016 since that's
when the California ivory ban became effective.
At 75, Ernie was not intending to continue making cues much longer, regardless of his
decision to submit a plea of guilty to this offense. As a California cue-maker, he was
no longer able to make any cues using ivory, nor could he buy any more ivory, or ever
sell another cue that had any type or amount of ivory.......unless he closed his shop and
relocated outside of California.........at 75, Ernie wasn't about to do that and 7/1 was just
around the corner ........Ernie was going to stuck with a lot of cues worth a lot of money,
likely more than what they two guys paid too......Ernie was going to get nothing for any
of his cues after July 1, 2017......he could never sell them unless he either did one of two
things........closed shop in CA & relocate to another state if he wanted to continue making
cues or else quit cue-making and just sell his cues privately and being physically not in the
geographical boundaries of CA when the sale was actually consummated, ex., a cue show.
Sounds like Ernie was trying to unload his merchandise which appears to me was driven by
the CA ivory ban that took effect July 1, 2017. He was going to get stuck with a lot of valuable
cues underway and these guys made a offer that would solve Ernie's dilemma but he knew
these guys were foreign investors. They might have even done lots of business or certainly
they were familiar with each other.......doesn't look good for Ernie since he has admitted his
complicity in the crime.....this could be the harbinger of the end of a legendary's cue-maker.
I betcha if the CA ivory ban had never even happened, neither would have this criminal offense.
Matt B.