watchez said:
Again, Mr. Zero - you missed the boat. My point, for the final time is, you keep saying how the women can play with the men but in fact you admit that you are not so knowledgable as a 25 year old so you have no basis. Obviously, you can't comprehend that but you don't have to as you are not willing to put any of your female championis in the box.
Also, so you can understand - I don't ever recall seeing a gambling match of alternating breaks unless it was one pocket. Stringing racks is part of the game. You don't like that part because you know that women cannot do it as well.
Why $10,000? Because, if I can speak for Bill/Reid/Ronny - Reid has not gambled in quite some time. IF he was to pursue it, it should be worth his while not some exhibition- race to 7, alternate breaks, break from the circle, loser pays the time - match that you would like to see.
Quote watchez:
Yes gambling is the best qualifier on who the better player is. (Also, the original subject of this thread)
Quote mr. zero:
WRONG AGAIN. The original post never mentioned the subject of whether gambling or tournament play was the best test of skill. Again...READING IS FUNDAMENTAL.
No hooked on phonics - it mentioned GAMBLING - THE ORIGINAL SUBJECT OF THIS THREAD.
Buy a ticket to the next WPBA event, wave to Allison and you will be happy. Don't worry about me.
You are AMAZING. If you would stop foaming at the mouth and READ up to 4th grade level you would see how embarrassing your hystrionics are.
Quote watchez:
Yes gambling is the best qualifier on who the better player is. (Also, the original subject of this thread)
Quote mr. zero:
WRONG AGAIN. The original post never mentioned the subject of whether gambling or tournament play was the best test of skill. Again...READING IS FUNDAMENTAL.
READ your comment. It is in RED. In it you state CLEARLY (but incorrectly) that the original subject of the thread had to do with gambling being the best qualifier of player skill.
Now READ my comment. It is in BLUE. It is also CORRECT. There is NO MENTION WHATSOEVER, in the original post of anything to do with gambling being used as a measure of a player's SKILL.
Why $10,000? Because, if I can speak for Bill/Reid/Ronny - Reid has not gambled in quite some time. IF he was to pursue it, it should be worth his while not some exhibition- race to 7, alternate breaks, break from the circle, loser pays the time - match that you would like to see.
That is probably the most ignorant post in this entire thread...and there have been some DOOZIES.
Possibly you haven't heard the buzz...but several WORLD CHAMPIONS are playing each other in IPT events for $5,000.00. And many others are traveling all over the United States entering tournaments offering a couple of thousand dollars in prize money.
The notion that your boy won't play for less than double what some of the greatest champions of all time aren't "too busy" to play forl just demonstrates what a fool you are.
My point, for the final time is, you keep saying how the women can play with the men but in fact you admit that you are not so knowledgable as a 25 year old so you have no basis.
No Mr. 3rd Grade Dropout. Here is my EXACT quote.
"You have seen and played in VASTLY more gambling matches than I have but in my experience, I would say that at least half of the ahead sets I've seen were won with packs and not grinding."
Do you understand the difference between KNOWLEDGE and EXPERIENCE?
DO YOU???
Are you aware that Astronauts have ZERO space travel EXPERIENCE when they take their first trip into space? But do you think they have no KNOWLEDGE???
ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have PLENTY of both KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE puppy dog.
And why do you use the grade school tactic of asserting your opponent has said something that he never did. I KNOW that Allison and Karen have no chance against top men over an extended series of matches AND NEVER SAID THEY DID!!
But what I also KNOW and what is a matter of FACT is that Allison and Karen CAN AND HAVE beaten top pro IN GIVEN MATCHES!
But the DCC thread where I got bashed by the likes of you was FULL of comments to the extent that they could not even finish in the money let alone top 50 and NO ONE thought they could end up top 20.
But they were WRONG and for some reason that seems to freak you out so badly that you post preposterous mischaracterizations of what I have been talking about.
Chill OUT.
(-: