true it is mot illegal. But how can ome even perform the pushing action and maintain any semblance of 'the fundamentals'. IMO what Island Drive wrote is spot on. Most techniques are simple throws. Throws are pulls. This is why I said right at the beginning that the physicists in here and the biomechanics guys are using the same word differently.
When focused on the object and where force is applied to it, it is a push of the cue. fine.
When focused on body movement and what actions are performed, it is clearly a pulling (or throwing if u prefer) action.
physicists: object is being pushed so it is a push.
biomechanics: since a pulling action is performed to generate movement, it's a pull.
IIt doesn't really matter what u call it I guess. The cue is being pushed by a pulling motion just sounds weird to me so Ima continue just calling strokes pulls since thats what we make our bodies do.
If u have an example of a pushing motion stroke I'd love to hear it. I could only think of a couple but they are both a departure from anything conventional.
When stroking all the way, fully back, to the fleshy section of my hand at the base of the forefinger and thumb, there is a bit of added oopmh to reverse direction. Since the cue tip has raised in height, it can be thought of as a small dropping down or a bit of conscious acceleration. More push than throw, this.
After the initial reverse of direction, acceleration should be subconscious and is practically automated. Now its more toss or pull (for me, for my stroke) into impact with the cb and beyond.
Beyond the semantics, I chose to teach this to several students in clinic last week to get the feel of a full backstroke and full forward stroke. There are many (most) league players these days who take a long bridge for most every shot, backstroke and inch to four inches or so, and lunge forward without that distinct, pro-like, "smooth, oily, gliding, flowing" stroke action.