Jabs at ScottLee notwithstanding......you cannot take up pool at like 40 and in a couple of years play pro pool.has never happened yet the game is to hard.you can become a great player but good enough to play pro...
If it were true that one could become a professional at any age then there should be many older professionals on the circuit. Older people (especially retired individuals) have more time to practice. Endurance, stamina or whatever can be enhanced. Mental attitudes are often better in that older people are usually (not always) more laid back and less threatened by social concerns.
I think that as in most sports there are physical requirements that fade with age. We can be pretty darn good at the game but lack the pure physical ability that decreases with age and that is why there are not many older players on the circuit.
I can more than afford the tournaments, the travel and have the time to meet all the requirments that the average pro has. In fact they would present an interesting and fun life style now that my "other" career is finished. What I don't have, and never will have, is the level of ability that the pros have.
It is not a matter of heart, willingness, or financial resources. Been there done that, bought the t-shirt and wore it out. It is simply a matter of decreasing physical prowess.
If it comes to putting on a roof, hiking a trail or swimming a few miles I can still out work or compete with men 20 years younger than me. I don't have the natural talent to play a concert violin or run 400 balls on a pool table.
I suspect there are many others like me.
BTW consider people like Nick Varner, Jim Rempe, and Allen Hopkins. You see them at many tournaments and some are involved in other ways. But you don't see them competing with the younger guys any more. It is a fact of life, physical prowess decreases with age. The aging process is well under way by the time we are 40.
I find that my pool skills keep improving over the last five years since I retired (at age 60) and the game is definetly part of my life style. But I also know that I will never play like I could have played earlier in life. I also cannot not do some of the gymnastic moves nor use a diving board like I could when I was younger.
John...I would agree with you, to a point. The first thing you're wrong about, is my ability to help expert and pro players play better. I have worked with both, to their high degree of satisafaction. Second, I don't know why you're singling me out, except that I post here more. I have never claimed to be a champion player. I have finished as high as 3rd in a national tournament, and I have coached students from being a beginner, to winning national championships. That does give me some credibility.
MANY top pro players have worked with Randyg, also with exceptional results. There are many other fine instructors who have no doubt worked with higher level players too. I don't discount the fact that elite players, like you mentioned, have the competitive experience to be able to offer excellent direction, in terms of strategy, and finer points of certain games. I'm not arguing that point at all. However, nobody can teach someone how not to get nervous, or how to not fold up mentally, when their opponent runs a 6-pack on them. You either have that, or you don't (and let's face it, confidence comes largely from being able to TRUST your stroke). On the other hand, I've said many times, that lessons with top pros are better served, for the benefit of the student, when the student has perfected their stroke process. Otherwise, you can show somebody great stroke shots to make, but they can't execute them, like the pro can (or at least not without several tries...which doesn't help much in competition). While I may not be in the same 'competitive' league with players like yourself, I certainly have plenty to offer 98% of the poolplayers out there. I offer a money back guarantee, if you're not satisfied. How can I do it better?
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
I'd like to hear some of the later ages in life that the better players have started and how quickly they became factors in the game of pool.
I would say that the grand majority of really good players started playing before they were driving, and playing well.
so with me nearing 35 i cant become a pro in 6 months? with me putting in 8 hours a day.
anyone wanna put money on it, cos i'll happily bet with anyone and take your money and re-write the record books on how old you can be and still turn pro.
I would be the last to disagree with your thinking Jude. I firmly believe that life is not over until the fat lady sings and life means taking chances, being involved and committed to an idea. Life is to be lived.
I am also realistic and think that too is a good way to live, though we all define reality diffeently ! (My definition includes a 650cc motorcycle that my children see somewhat differently)
I would think that beginning a pool career at 29 with the intent to be a professional is plausible and probably nearing the edge of when one could expect to become a professional player as we generally understand that term. I agree that there are all sorts of exceptions to the statistical norms (that is one of the resons we use statistics). However, the anomalies will probably stand out early in their career (at whatever age).
You've been playing snooker all your life so it doesnt count. But i'd still say it'll be hard to be a pro in 6 months. Good luck though.
so were you really a psychotherapist? what was that like? you know I know a few therapists personally. Actually, I read a lot of stuff on gestalt and holistic stuff in my spare time and probably would be better off switching my concentration to something in that area. So do you think you did the right thing, or wish you had been a monk instead?
guys like scott can teach the basics no doubt and do a great job.
thing is pool is about 50 percent decisions and 50 percent execution.
you absolutely should rate a pool coach on his ability because that shows how much knowledge they have for all aspects of the game.14.1,9ball,1hole etc.
if you think scott lee or any other non world class player coach could show you the same stuff and decision making as say mika ,archer,or myself i beg to differ.
another thing theres a reason pro basketball teams hire ex pro players to coach the team.its because the ex pro player knows what hes talking about from experience.
then theres the golf coaches and everybody says yeah but they cant play on tour.
believe me many of the swing coaches on the golf tour are ex pro playes or extremely good players.they could just about play on tour.hank haney,butch harmon etc.
all these guys that teach pool and claim i would have played pro pool but theres no money in it,instead i teach.lol its because they only play decent and have no other choice.
believe me ask johnny archer if he would rather be him or a pool instuctor lol.
in closing guys like scott lee are good for pool and teaching beginners.
but if anybody thinks that he could teach somebody as much as say allen hopkins over a weeks time then they have never taken a lesson for a week from both guys.
also no you cannot take up pool at like 40 and in a couple of years play pro pool.has never happened yet the game is to hard.you can become a great player but good enough to play pro i dont think so,not even with scott lees help.
agreed .
thing is all these guys who call themselves master instructors kinda bugs me.
if i go out and say im a master mechanic and charge people big money to fix their cars,they are gonna be hot when they find out ive only worked on lawnmowers.
you are a good instructor and i dont know if you call yourself a master instructor or not.
problem is 99 percent of the guys out their milking people for big money are calling themselves master instructors.
many of these masters are nice guys,good players etc but they are not masters at anything involving pool and they know it.
im sorry if i singled you out but if any of these so called masters would like to take a may we call it pool i.q. test im game.
then people can decide who are actually master instructors and who they want to pay 1000 for a 3 day lesson too. again what im saying is not directed totally at you.
thaank you john schmidt. just wanted a player's point of view
John...Thank you. I will agree that there are certainly some teachers who either just "claim" to be master instructors, but don't know their stuff. On the other hand, there are several BCA Certified Master Instructors, who are incredibly savvy on everything pool...including playing at a very high level. Randyg is one of several, but probably the smartest one of the bunch. I try to spend as much time with him as I can, and I learn a LOT every time I'm around him...either playing against him, or observing/teaching with him. I can easily name at least another half dozen to a dozen teachers with the same kind of credentials. Some are BCA Certified...some are not. They are all, imo, master instructors, who know exactly what they're talking about. You definitely have to separate the wheat from the chaff...which is sometimes not that easy.
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
If it were true that one could become a professional at any age then there should be many older professionals on the circuit. Older people (especially retired individuals) have more time to practice. Endurance, stamina or whatever can be enhanced. Mental attitudes are often better in that older people are usually (not always) more laid back and less threatened by social concerns.
I think that as in most sports there are physical requirements that fade with age. We can be pretty darn good at the game but lack the pure physical ability that decreases with age and that is why there are not many older players on the circuit.
I can more than afford the tournaments, the travel and have the time to meet all the requirments that the average pro has. In fact they would present an interesting and fun life style now that my "other" career is finished. What I don't have, and never will have, is the level of ability that the pros have.
It is not a matter of heart, willingness, or financial resources. Been there done that, bought the t-shirt and wore it out. It is simply a matter of decreasing physical prowess.
If it comes to putting on a roof, hiking a trail or swimming a few miles I can still out work or compete with men 20 years younger than me. I don't have the natural talent to play a concert violin or run 400 balls on a pool table.
I suspect there are many others like me.
BTW consider people like Nick Varner, Jim Rempe, and Allen Hopkins. You see them at many tournaments and some are involved in other ways. But you don't see them competing with the younger guys any more. It is a fact of life, physical prowess decreases with age. The aging process is well under way by the time we are 40.
I find that my pool skills keep improving over the last five years since I retired (at age 60) and the game is definetly part of my life style. But I also know that I will never play like I could have played earlier in life. I also cannot not do some of the gymnastic moves nor use a diving board like I could when I was younger.