This thread lost any credibility with the words " bonus ball points".
Thanks.
I'm sure he'll just gloss right over it, or say I don't understand what he's talking about.
I'm even more sure we've all had this exact discussion before.
If you can find 128 players in the world that can
A. Beat the 9ball ghost
B. On a 9' table
C. With a standard wooden triangle rack
D. Race to 11
AND without ever taking ball in hand.
Let me know.
When you finally get you “pro tour” off the ground that you’ve been touting for years, you can use your qualification system.
Until then, leave the ghost, with bih and template racks, to us bangers. It’s quite an accomplishment for us to beat it. And none of us are so out of touch that we think we can compete with top players if we beat it.
Thank you.
We have bandied the historical percentages about, more than a little.We can get a feeling for that by looking at the percentage of break-and-runs on successful breaks.
I looked at 19 9-Ball events for which I tracked streamed matches (over 3,200 games) over the past 3 years. Most of the events were the Mosconi Cup, US Open 9-Ball Championship, Turning Stone Classic, Derby City Classic, and WPA World 9-Ball Championship. Most of the streamed matches involved at least one top pro and many were with two top pros. The events include a mixture of rules, racks (including templates), and racking locations.
In none of the 19 events was the rate of B&R on successful breaks as high as 50%. The range was from 25% to 48%. The aggregate for all 19 events was 38%.
I am a slight favorite against the 9 ball ghost. I recently beat the 10 ball ghost on a medium tight 9' gold crown with wooden rack. They make me an A+ in the tourneys. And I think on my good days that might be right, maybe a little high. I can assure Glen that I do not even remotely consider myself a pro. Pros will drill me. At the same time, I'm definitely not a B player. Some people have fairly realistic assessments of their own game...which is the point of me mentioning these things.
KMRUNOUT
Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
The longest test of pure firepower by a top tier pro was Neils Feign playing the ghost on live stream a few years back. He had to win 120 games before the ghost won 20 (or something similar, I’m going by memory). Neils barely lost.
And that's ALL I'm trying to point out, but the truth is, most people don't want to hear the truth, they'd rather go on believing they're game is skilled enough that they don't need.to practice from the break trying to run out, when they can take the easy way and start with bih, yet lay claims to their skills because THEY TOO can beat the 9ball ghost, like everyone else can.
Yet today, world championships are won in races to 9, 11, or 13 games and if there's alternating breaks, there's NO chance for a player to really exhibit their break and run abilitys.
We can get a feeling for that by looking at the percentage of break-and-runs on successful breaks.
I looked at 19 9-Ball events for which I tracked streamed matches (over 3,200 games) over the past 3 years. Most of the events were the Mosconi Cup, US Open 9-Ball Championship, Turning Stone Classic, Derby City Classic, and WPA World 9-Ball Championship. Most of the streamed matches involved at least one top pro and many were with two top pros. The events include a mixture of rules, racks (including templates), and racking locations.
In none of the 19 events was the rate of B&R on successful breaks as high as 50%. The range was from 25% to 48%. The aggregate for all 19 events was 38%.
We can get a feeling for that by looking at the percentage of break-and-runs on successful breaks.
I looked at 19 9-Ball events for which I tracked streamed matches (over 3,200 games) over the past 3 years. Most of the events were the Mosconi Cup, US Open 9-Ball Championship, Turning Stone Classic, Derby City Classic, and WPA World 9-Ball Championship. Most of the streamed matches involved at least one top pro and many were with two top pros. The events include a mixture of rules, racks (including templates), and racking locations.
In none of the 19 events was the rate of B&R on successful breaks as high as 50%. The range was from 25% to 48%. The aggregate for all 19 events was 38%.
No, I'm not ignoring what you said, but it stands to reason why there's NO PRO'S only world events, and that reason is because there are a lot more player's who THINK they're Pro's and therefore entitled to play in any so called world championship tournament, rather than fail having to pass a skill level test in which ONLY the TOP 128 in the world are qualified to play in....to represtnt this sport at it's highest level of competition! And yes, of course this kind of test don't show how the player plays defense....but it would at lease show who does by offensive playing skills and therefore separate those who just pay an entry fee to belong in the tournament!!
Glen, I know you are passionate about the game. I think we all are that post regularly here.
I wish changing the format would make the game more popular, and bring in new players. From bangers on dates, to serious players. But I think in the hundreds of years some version of billiards has been around, it has steadily decreased in popularity. So many format changes were tried over the decades to reverse this course. None were successful.
People just have so many other things to do with their time now. I don't think the game will ever be popular again on a social level, or on a professional level. Unfortunately.
But that's what no one seems to understand, pool is exploding in most other countries OUTSIDE the United States, how do you explain that?
1. No one that can simply beat the 9-ball ghost with BIH thinks they are a pro.
2. While I suppose it is possible to develop a skill test that could somehow rank the top 128 players in the world. I can assure you that you will not find those 128 players if your skill test is having them beat the ghost without BIH.